The Quantitative Analysis of Space Policy: A Review of Current Methods and Future Directions

被引:4
|
作者
Pomeroy, Caleb [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Computational social science; Research methods; Text analysis; Network analysis; Public opinion; International space law; P-ASTERISK MODELS; PUBLIC-OPINION; NETWORK ANALYSIS; BIG DATA; TEXT ANALYSIS; TOPIC MODELS; SUPPORT; POSITIONS; SCIENCE; COLLABORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.08.001
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
Decades of space policy research have yielded an eclectic, multidisciplinary research agenda replete with findings that are relevant for theory and policy. Absent from the literature, however, is a systematic review and discussion of the data and research methods used to ascertain these findings. This is important for research progress because data and method choice have implications for the validity of the findings, potential contributions to theory, and efficacy of suggested policy prescriptions. Motivated by advances in computational social science, this article reviews the quantitative space policy literature and finds scope for further development with respect to data sources, method selection, and substantive topics of inquiry. Given these findings, two methodological areas are introduced, namely text and network analysis, and their utility is illustrated through an extension of a previous public opinion study, as well as a novel application regarding state support for international space law. This review might be relevant to scholars and practitioners interested in the empirical study of space policy. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:14 / 29
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Space-Time Analysis: Concepts, Quantitative Methods, and Future Directions
    An, Li
    Tsou, Ming-Hsiang
    Crook, Stephen E. S.
    Chun, Yongwan
    Spitzberg, Brian
    Gawron, J. Mark
    Gupta, Dipak K.
    ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2015, 105 (05) : 891 - 914
  • [2] Contained Morcellation: Review of Current Methods and Future Directions
    Taylan, Enes
    Sahin, Cagdas
    Zeybek, Burak
    Akdemir, Ali
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2017, 4
  • [3] Application of deep learning for the analysis of stomata: a review of current methods and future directions
    Gibbs, Jonathon A.
    Burgess, Alexandra J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2024,
  • [4] Current methods and future directions in avian diet analysis
    Hoenig, Brandon D.
    Snider, Allison M.
    Forsman, Anna M.
    Hobson, Keith A.
    Latta, Steven C.
    Miller, Eliot T.
    Polito, Michael J.
    Powell, Luke L.
    Rogers, Samantha L.
    Sherry, Thomas W.
    Toews, David P. L.
    Welch, Andreanna J.
    Taylor, Sabrina S.
    Porter, Brady A.
    ORNITHOLOGY, 2022, 139 (01)
  • [5] Quantitative Elastography Methods in Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Kennedy, Paul
    Wagner, Mathilde
    Castera, Laurent
    Hong, Cheng William
    Johnson, Curtis L.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Taouli, Bachir
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (03) : 738 - 763
  • [6] Phototherapy: Current methods and future directions
    Vreman, HJ
    Wong, RJ
    Stevenson, DK
    SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2004, 28 (05) : 326 - 333
  • [7] Assessing billfish stocks: A review of current methods and some future directions
    Punt, Andre E.
    Su, Nan-Jay
    Sun, Chi-Lu
    FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2015, 166 : 103 - 118
  • [8] Quantitative methods for climate change and mental health research: current trends and future directions
    Massazza, Alessandro
    Teyton, Anais
    Charlson, Fiona
    Benmarhnia, Tarik
    Augustinavicius, Jura L.
    LANCET PLANETARY HEALTH, 2022, 6 (07): : E613 - E627
  • [9] Coral restoration - A systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions
    Bostrom-Einarsson, Lisa
    Babcock, Russell C.
    Bayraktarov, Elisa
    Ceccarelli, Daniela
    Cook, Nathan
    Ferse, Sebastian C. A.
    Hancock, Boze
    Harrison, Peter
    Hein, Margaux
    Shaver, Elizabeth
    Smith, Adam
    Suggett, David
    Stewart-Sinclair, Phoebe J.
    Vardi, Tali
    McLeod, Ian M.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [10] Kernel methods: Current research and future directions
    Cristianini, N
    Campbell, C
    Burges, C
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2002, 46 (1-3) : 5 - 9