Development of life cycle water footprints for gas-fired power generation technologies

被引:30
|
作者
Ali, Babkir [1 ]
Kumar, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Mech Engn, Donadeo Innovat Ctr Engn, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G8, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Water-energy nexus; Natural gas; Shale gas; Electricity generation; Life cycle assessment; SHALE GAS; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.048
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The key objective of this paper is to develop a benchmark for water demand coefficients of the complete life cycle of natural gas-fired power generation. Water demand coefficients include water consumption and water withdrawals for various stages of natural gas production as well as for power generation from it. Pathways were structured based on the unit operations of the types of natural gas sources, power generation technologies, and cooling systems. Eighteen generic pathways were developed to comparatively study the impacts of different unit operations on water demand. The lowest life cycle water consumption coefficient of 0.12 L/kW his for the pathway of conventional gas with combined cycle technology, and dry cooling. The highest life cycle consumption coefficient of 2.57 L/kW his for a pathway of shale gas utilization through steam cycle technology and cooling tower systems. The water consumption coefficient for the complete life cycle of cogeneration technology is in the range 0.07-0.39 L/kW h and for withdrawals ranged 0.10-14.73 L/kW h. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 396
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global mitigation opportunities for the life cycle of natural gas-fired power
    Sarah M. Jordaan
    Andrew W. Ruttinger
    Kavita Surana
    Destenie Nock
    Scot M. Miller
    Arvind P. Ravikumar
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2022, 12 : 1059 - 1067
  • [2] Global mitigation opportunities for the life cycle of natural gas-fired power
    Jordaan, Sarah M.
    Ruttinger, Andrew W.
    Surana, Kavita
    Nock, Destenie
    Miller, Scot M.
    Ravikumar, Arvind P.
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2022, 12 (11) : 1059 - +
  • [3] PROSPECT OF GAS-FIRED POWER GENERATION IN CHINA
    Liu Zhihong and Liu Hequn(China Petroleum Planning and Engineering Institute
    [J]. China Oil & Gas, 1999, (01) : 60 - 61
  • [4] Methology and Case Study on Water Footprint of Gas-fired Power Generation Company
    He Junfei
    Huang Jiayu
    Xie Zeqiong
    Chen Qingwen
    Wang Zhao
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF GREEN BUILDINGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (GBEM 2018), 2018, 186
  • [5] Decline in gas-fired power generation expected in the USA
    不详
    [J]. OIL GAS-EUROPEAN MAGAZINE, 2021, 47 (02): : 10 - 10
  • [6] Influence of various carbon capture technologies on the performance of natural gas-fired combined cycle power plants
    Ji Ho Ahn
    Ji Hun Jeong
    Byeong Seon Choi
    Tong Seop Kim
    [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33 : 1431 - 1440
  • [7] Influence of various carbon capture technologies on the performance of natural gas-fired combined cycle power plants
    Ji Ho Ahn
    Jeong, Ji Hun
    Choi, Byeong Seon
    Kim, Tong Seop
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (03) : 1431 - 1440
  • [8] Life Cycle Analysis of Natural Gas-Fired Distributed Combined Heat and Power versus Centralized Power Plant
    Meng, Fanxu
    Dillingham, Gavin
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2018, 32 (11) : 11731 - 11741
  • [9] US Gas-Fired Power Development: Last Man Standing
    Burt, Britt
    Mullins, Shane
    [J]. POWER, 2010, 154 (09) : 71 - 73
  • [10] Gasification of clarified sludge for electrical power generation with gas-fired engines
    Hiller, R
    Molitor, J
    Burgbacher, C
    [J]. FLUIDIZED BED COMBUSTION AND GASIFICATION: EXPERIENCE AND PROSPECTS, 2000, 1535 : 261 - 269