Epistemic Injustice and Illness

被引:159
|
作者
Kidd, Ian James [1 ]
Carel, Havi [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Dept Philosophy, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Philosophy, Cotham House, Cotham BS6 6JL, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
PHENOMENOLOGY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/japp.12172
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article analyses the phenomenon of epistemic injustice within contemporary healthcare. We begin by detailing the persistent complaints patients make about their testimonial frustration and hermeneutical marginalization, and the negative impact this has on their care. We offer an epistemic analysis of this problem using Miranda Fricker's account of epistemic injustice. We detail two types of epistemic injustice, testimonial and hermeneutical, and identify the negative stereotypes and structural features of modern healthcare practices that generate them. We claim that these stereotypes and structural features render ill persons especially vulnerable to these two types of epistemic injustice. We end by proposing five avenues for further work on epistemic injustice in healthcare.
引用
收藏
页码:172 / 190
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条