Comparative study of three different combination surgical methods for recurrent patella dislocation

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Xing-Liang [1 ]
Wang, Xiao-Long [2 ]
Peng, Chao [2 ]
Yang, Jia-Ji [1 ]
Hua, Guo-Jun [1 ]
Liu, Yun-Peng [1 ]
机构
[1] 904 Hosp Peoples Liberat Army, Dept Orthoped Surg, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Wuxi Clin Coll, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION; LATERAL RELEASE; INSTABILITY; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jos.2020.01.008
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The effects of different combination of surgical techniques for recurrent patella dislocation (RPD) remain unclear. Thus, aim of this study was to investigate the surgical outcomes of different combination of surgical techniques for RPD. Methods: The clinical data of 79 patients with RPD from August 2014 to October 2016 were analysed retrospectively. Knee joint was assessed according to measurements of the congruence angle (CA), patellar tilt angle (PTA) and lateral patellofemoral angle (LPFA). Knee function was evaluated by Kujala patellofemoral score, Lysholm knee score and Tegner score. Patients were followed up by out-patient examination and telephone till October 2018. Results: Preoperative clinical characteristics were similar across groups. It was statistically insignificant among three groups in CA, PTA, LPFA and redislocation rate. In term of knee functions, the MPFL reconstruction and LPR release group had the highest score (Lysholm score: 91.82 +/- 4.64, Kujala score: 94.22 +/- 4.26, Tegner score: 5.80 +/- 1.00, respectively) and the LPR release and MPR plication had the lowest score (Lysholm score: 78.10 +/- 6.90, Kujala score: 80.91 +/- 4.30, Tegner score: 4.98 +/- 1.22, respectively). Conclusion: Three combinations of surgical methods were similar in terms of postoperative joint congruence and redislocation rate, but MPFL reconstruction combined with LPR release is worthy to be promoted with the highest knee function scores. (C) 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1067 / 1071
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of different surgical methods in treating recurrent patella dislocation after three-dimensional reconstruction
    Hao Du
    Xiao-xiao Tian
    Fa-qi Guo
    Xiang-ming Li
    Tao-tao Ji
    Bin Li
    Tong-sen Li
    International Orthopaedics, 2017, 41 : 2517 - 2524
  • [2] Evaluation of different surgical methods in treating recurrent patella dislocation after three-dimensional reconstruction
    Du, Hao
    Tian, Xiao-xiao
    Guo, Fa-qi
    Li, Xiang-ming
    Ji, Tao-tao
    Li, Bin
    Li, Tong-sen
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (12) : 2517 - 2524
  • [3] SURGICAL TREATMENT OF RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF THE PATELLA
    BOWKER, JH
    THOMPSON, EB
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1964, 46 (06): : 1369 - 1370
  • [4] SURGICAL TREATMENT OF RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF THE PATELLA - A STUDY OF 48 CASES
    BOWKER, JH
    THOMPSON, EB
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1964, 46 (07): : 1451 - 1461
  • [5] Recurrent dislocation is different from habitual dislocation of patella
    Batra, Sumit
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (10) : 2223 - 2223
  • [6] SURGICAL-TREATMENT OF RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF THE PATELLA
    AGLIETTI, P
    BUZZI, R
    DEBIASE, P
    GIRON, F
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1994, (308) : 8 - 17
  • [7] Recurrent dislocation is different from habitual dislocation of patella
    Sumit Batra
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 2223 - 2223
  • [8] MODIFIED SURGICAL PROCEDURES IN RECURRENT DISLOCATION OF PATELLA
    VILLIGER, KJ
    CHIRURG, 1978, 49 (04): : 223 - 227
  • [9] Reply to “recurrent dislocation is different from habitual dislocation of patella”
    Fei Wang
    Gang Ji
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 2225 - 2225
  • [10] Reply to "recurrent dislocation is different from habitual dislocation of patella"
    Wang, Fei
    Ji, Gang
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (10) : 2225 - 2225