Impact of different heating and current drive methods on the early q-profile evolution in JET

被引:15
|
作者
Tala, TJJ
Parail, VV
Becoulet, A
Challis, CD
Corrigan, G
Hawkes, NC
Heading, DJ
Mantsinen, MJ
Nowak, S
机构
[1] VTT Chem Technol, Assoc Euratom Tekes, FIN-02044 Espoo, Finland
[2] EURATOM, Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England
[3] EURATOM, CEA Cadarache, F-13108 St Paul Les Durance, France
[4] Aalto Univ, Assoc Euratom Tekes, FIN-02015 Helsinki, Finland
[5] EURATOM, ENEA, CNR, Ist Fis Plasma, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0741-3335/44/7/309
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Transport calculations illustrate that the lower hybrid current drive (LHCD) and off-axis electron cyclotron current drive (ECCD) are the only preheating methods that can create a wide, deeply reversed q-profile, i.e. large negative magnetic shear, on the JET tokamak. Off-axis neutral beam injection (NBI) and off-axis ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH) preheating yields a weakly reversed q-profile (small negative magnetic shear), whereas NBI and ICRH on-axis heating as well as ohmic preheating produce a monotonic q-profile in the preheating phase. Here, on-axis power deposition and current drive refers to heating and current drive at or close to magnetic axis and correspondingly, off-axis refers to heating and current drive deposited typically around the half minor radius (r/a = 0.3-0.6). The results on LHCD, ICRH and ohmic preheating have been verified in the recent JET experiments. The current drive efficiency scan shows that in the case of LHCD, ECCD and off-axis NBI, the driven current is absolutely crucial to obtain a reversed q-profile and to modify the current profile evolution drastically in the preheating phase. Taking into account only the direct electron heating effect, LHCD does not create a reversed q-profile. The timing scans indicate that the radial location of q(min) at the end of the preheating phase is generally quite insensitive to the start time of the preheating, once started 0-2 s after the plasma initiation if the method relies upon the driven current. On the other hand, methods relying only upon electron heating are very sensitive to that. In both cases, the magnitude of the negative magnetic shear, however, seems to be very sensitive to the start time of the preheating.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1202
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] q-profile evolution and improved core electron confinement in the full current drive operation on Tore Supra
    Litaudon, X
    Peysson, Y
    Aniel, T
    Huysmans, G
    Imbeaux, F
    Joffrin, E
    Lasalle, J
    Lotte, P
    Schunke, B
    Segui, JL
    Tresset, G
    Zabiego, M
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2001, 43 (05) : 677 - 693
  • [2] Determination of the off-axis current for the sustainment of the q-profile on JET hybrid scenarios
    Garcia, J.
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2013, 55 (08)
  • [3] Influence of the q-profile shape on plasma performance in JET
    Challis, CD
    Litaudon, X
    Tresset, G
    Baranov, YF
    Bécoulet, A
    Giroud, C
    Hawkes, NC
    Howell, DF
    Joffrin, E
    Lomas, PJ
    Mailloux, J
    Mantsinen, MJ
    Stratton, BC
    Ward, DJ
    Zastrow, KD
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2002, 44 (07) : 1031 - 1055
  • [4] PROPOSAL TO MEASURE THE Q-PROFILE ON JET BY THOMSON SCATTERING
    CAROLAN, PG
    FORREST, MJ
    GOWERS, CW
    NIELSEN, P
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS, 1990, 61 (10): : 2926 - 2928
  • [5] On the ECCD current density profile with particle diffusion in eITBs and its impact on the q-profile
    Asp, E.
    Sauter, O.
    Coda, S.
    Fable, E.
    Goodman, T. P.
    Turri, G.
    Udintsev, V. S.
    Zucca, C.
    THEORY OF FUSION PLASMAS, 2006, 871 : 283 - +
  • [6] Sawtooth induced q-profile evolution at ASDEX Upgrade
    Fischer, R.
    Bock, A.
    Burckhart, A.
    Ford, O. P.
    Giannone, L.
    Igochine, V
    Weiland, M.
    Willensdorfer, M.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2019, 59 (05)
  • [7] ANALYSIS OF CYCLIC Q-PROFILE EVOLUTION DURING INTERNAL DISRUPTIONS
    SOLER, M
    OLIVARES, AG
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1987, 29 (05) : 661 - 670
  • [8] EVOLUTION OF THE Q-PROFILE IN AN EXTERNALLY HEATED TOKAMAK IN THE BANANA REGIME
    JARDIN, SC
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 24 (08): : 1042 - 1042
  • [9] Effect of q-profile modification by LHCD on internal transport barriers in JET
    Challis, CD
    Baranov, YF
    Conway, GD
    Gormezano, C
    Gowers, CW
    Hawkes, NC
    Hender, TC
    Joffrin, E
    Mailloux, J
    Mazon, D
    Podda, S
    Prentice, R
    Rimini, FG
    Sharapov, SE
    Sips, ACC
    Stratton, BC
    Testa, D
    Zastrow, KD
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2001, 43 (07) : 861 - 879
  • [10] Effect of fuel isotope mass on q-profile formation in JET hybrid plasmas
    Challis, C. D.
    Brezinsek, S.
    Coffey, I. H.
    Fontana, M.
    Hawkes, N. C.
    Keeling, D. L.
    King, D. B.
    Pucella, G.
    Viezzer, E.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2020, 60 (08)