Relating costs to the user value of farmland biodiversity measurements

被引:7
|
作者
Targetti, S. [1 ,2 ]
Herzog, F. [3 ]
Geijzendorffer, I. R. [4 ]
Pointereau, P. [5 ]
Viaggi, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Inst Adv Studies, F-13004 Marseille, France
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Agr Sci, I-40127 Bologna, Italy
[3] Inst Sustainabil Sci, Agroscope, CH-8046 Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Avignon Univ, Inst Mediterraneen Biodiversite & Ecol Marine & C, CNRS, IRD,Aix Marseille Univ, F-13545 Aix En Provence 04, France
[5] SOLAGRO, Initiat & Innovat Energy Agr & Environm, F-31076 Toulouse, France
关键词
Agriculture; Farmer; Volunteer; Citizen science; Biodiversity indicators; Multi-criteria evaluation; Stakeholders; CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; CITIZEN SCIENCE; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; POLICY; CONSERVATION; INDICATORS; MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.044
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The impact of agricultural management on global biodiversity highlights the need for farm-scale monitoring programmes capable of determining the performance of agriculture practices. Yet the identification of appropriate indicators is a challenging process and one that involves considering a number of different aspects and requirements. Besides the attention given to scientific effectiveness, relevant but less studied issues related to biodiversity measurements include the economic feasibility of monitoring programmes and the relevance of indicators for different end-users. In this paper, we combine an analytic assessment of costs and a stakeholder-based evaluation of the usefulness of a set of biodiversity-related parameters (habitat mapping, vegetation, bees, earthworms, spiders, and a farmer questionnaire) tested for scientific consistency in 12 European case studies and on more than 14,000 ha of farmland. The results point to the possibility of meeting the expectations of different end-users (administrators, farmers and consumers) with a common indicator set. Combining costs and usefulness also suggests the possibility of designing more efficient monitoring approaches involving private agencies and networks of volunteers and farmers for the field data collection at different stages of a monitoring programme. Although complex, such an approach would make it possible to enhance the effectiveness of available funds for farmland biodiversity monitoring. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 297
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Harnessing the biodiversity value of Central and Eastern European farmland
    Sutcliffe, Laura M. E.
    Batary, Peter
    Kormann, Urs
    Baldi, Andras
    Dicks, Lynn V.
    Herzon, Irina
    Kleijn, David
    Tryjanowski, Piotr
    Apostolova, Iva
    Arlettaz, Raphael
    Aunins, Ainars
    Aviron, Stephanie
    Balezentiene, Ligita
    Fischer, Christina
    Halada, Lubos
    Hartel, Tibor
    Helm, Aveliina
    Hristov, Iordan
    Jelaska, Sven D.
    Kaligaric, Mitja
    Kamp, Johannes
    Klimek, Sebastian
    Koorberg, Pille
    Kostiukova, Jarmila
    Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko
    Kuemmerle, Tobias
    Leuschner, Christoph
    Lindborg, Regina
    Loos, Jacqueline
    Maccherini, Simona
    Marja, Riho
    Mathe, Orsolya
    Paulini, Inge
    Proenca, Vania
    Rey-Benayas, Jose
    Sans, F. Xavier
    Seifert, Charlotte
    Stalenga, Jaroslaw
    Timaeus, Johannes
    Toeroek, Peter
    van Swaay, Chris
    Viik, Eneli
    Tscharntke, Teja
    DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2015, 21 (06) : 722 - 730
  • [2] Transaction costs and the present value "puzzle" of farmland prices
    de Fontnouvelle, P
    Lence, SH
    SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2002, 68 (03) : 549 - 565
  • [3] Improving the Farmland Biodiversity Value of Riparian Buffer Strips: Conflicts and Compromises
    McCracken, David I.
    Cole, Lorna J.
    Harrison, William
    Robertson, Duncan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2012, 41 (02) : 355 - 363
  • [4] Measuring value in diabetes care: Relating outcomes to costs.
    Mecklenburg, R
    Meldrum, N
    Fenster, L
    Dykan, M
    DIABETES, 1997, 46 : 135 - 135
  • [5] Relating Software Quality Models and Process Methods to User Value
    Sheriff, Mohamed A.
    Georgiadou, Elli
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN CAPITAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONALS, 2013, 4 (02) : 27 - 42
  • [6] Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture
    Butler, S. J.
    Vickery, J. A.
    Norris, K.
    SCIENCE, 2007, 315 (5810) : 381 - 384
  • [7] Making sense of farmland biodiversity management: an evaluation of a farmland biodiversity management communication strategy with farmersMaking sense of farmland biodiversity management: an evaluation of a farmland biodiversity management communication strategy with farmersAoife Leader et al.
    Aoife Leader
    James Kinsella
    Richard O’Brien
    Agriculture and Human Values, 2024, 41 (4) : 1647 - 1665
  • [8] Making sense of farmland biodiversity management: an evaluation of a farmland biodiversity management communication strategy with farmers
    Leader, Aoife
    Kinsella, James
    O'Brien, Richard
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2024, 41 (04) : 1647 - 1665
  • [9] Transaction costs and the present value model of farmland: Iowa, 1900-1994
    Lence, SH
    Miller, DJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 81 (02) : 257 - 272
  • [10] Biodiversity and landscape interactions on Scottish farmland
    McCracken, DI
    Dennis, P
    Milligan, AL
    Cole, LJ
    Downie, IS
    Murphy, KJ
    Furness, RW
    Waterhouse, A
    Foster, GN
    Milne, JA
    QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2000, : 97 - 106