Improve Environmental and Economic Performance with Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA)

被引:0
|
作者
Shatkin, J. [1 ]
Larsen, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] CLF Ventures Inc, Boston, MA USA
关键词
nanomaterials; life cycle analysis; sustainable product design;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA) is a pre-regulatory exercise that analyzes industrial processes and products to assess efficacy of existing production efforts and identify priorities for enhancing triple bottom line performance for product lines. SLCA includes aspects of standard Risk Assessment, Life Cycle Risk Assessment (LCRA), and Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) methodologies. It also draws upon technical understanding of environmental management, health risk assessment, industrial ecology, energy management and real estate and business planning. Importantly, SLCA offers an effective high-level screening of key product design criteria that focuses subsequent deeper assessments, allowing for low cost and rapid product assessments built on LCA principles [1]. This process can be especially useful when applied to nanomaterial product development since nanomaterials are not yet widely regulated and their impacts have not yet been widely studied. However the framework is effective for screening potential impacts and risks of various sectors at both the facility and individual product level.
引用
收藏
页码:828 / 831
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimization and Economic Performance Improvement of Processes Using Aspen HYSYS and Streamlined Life Cycle Assessment
    Aquino, Jesunino R.
    Bautista, Marie Angeline C.
    Lat, Dean Christian F.
    Llave, Rav Christian M.
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT (ICENV 2018): EMPOWERING ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE ENGINEERING NEXUS THROUGH GREEN TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 2124
  • [2] Integrated assessment method for building life cycle environmental and economic performance
    Lijing Gu
    Borong Lin
    Yingxin Zhu
    Daojin Gu
    Mingxing Huang
    Jiazi Gai
    [J]. Building Simulation, 2008, 1 : 169 - 177
  • [3] Integrated Assessment Method for Building Life Cycle Environmental and Economic Performance
    Gu, Lijing
    Lin, Borong
    Zhu, Yingxin
    Gu, Daojin
    Huang, Mingxing
    Gai, Jiazi
    [J]. BUILDING SIMULATION, 2008, 1 (02) : 169 - 177
  • [4] Application of life cycle assessment to improve the environmental performance of a ceramic tile packaging system
    Bovea, MD
    Serrano, J
    Bruscas, GM
    Gallardo, A
    [J]. PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2006, 19 (02) : 83 - 95
  • [5] Jamaican bioethanol: an environmental and economic life cycle assessment
    E. Batuecas
    R. Contreras-Lisperguer
    C. Mayo
    R. Díaz
    C. Springer
    F. J. Pérez
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2021, 23 : 1415 - 1430
  • [6] Jamaican bioethanol: an environmental and economic life cycle assessment
    Batuecas, E.
    Contreras-Lisperguer, R.
    Mayo, C.
    Diaz, R.
    Springer, C.
    Perez, F. J.
    [J]. CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2021, 23 (05) : 1415 - 1430
  • [7] Environmental and economic assessment of gasification wastewater treatment by life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach
    Innocenzi, Valentina
    Cantarini, Federica
    Zueva, Svetlana
    Amato, Alessia
    Morico, Barbara
    Beolchini, Francesca
    Prisciandaro, Marina
    Veglio, Francesco
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [8] Rigor in social life cycle assessment: improving the scientific grounding of SLCA
    Grubert, Emily
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (03): : 481 - 491
  • [9] Rigor in social life cycle assessment: improving the scientific grounding of SLCA
    Emily Grubert
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 481 - 491
  • [10] Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA)
    Annekatrin Lehmann
    Eva Zschieschang
    Marzia Traverso
    Matthias Finkbeiner
    Liselotte Schebek
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1581 - 1592