Results of the 2012-2013 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) Job Search and Career Planning Survey of Graduating Residents in the United States

被引:8
|
作者
Mattes, Malcolm D. [1 ]
Kharofa, Jordan [2 ]
Zeidan, Youssef H. [3 ]
Tung, Kaity [1 ]
Gondi, Vinai [4 ,5 ]
Golden, Daniel W. [6 ]
机构
[1] New York Methodist Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Brooklyn, NY 11215 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Comprehens Canc, Madison, WI USA
[5] Cent Dupage Hosp, Ctr Canc, Warrenville, IL USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
CHIEF RESIDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.09.033
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose/Objective(s): To determine the timeline used by postgraduate year (PGY)-5 radiation oncology residents during the job application process and the factors most important to them when deciding on a first job. Methods and Materials: In 2012 and 2013, the Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology conducted a nationwide electronic survey of PGY-5 radiation oncology residents in the United States during the final 2 months of their training. Descriptive statistics are reported. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed. Results: Surveys were completed by 180 of 314 residents contacted. The median time to start networking for the purpose of employment was January PGY-4; to start contacting practices, complete and upload a curriculum vitae to a job search website, and use the American Society of Radiation Oncology Career Center was June PGY-4; to obtain letters of recommendation was July PGY-5; to start interviewing was August PGY-5; to finish interviewing was December PGY-5; and to accept a contract was January PGY-5. Those applying for a community position began interviewing at an earlier average time than did those applying for an academic position (P=.04). The most important factors to residents when they evaluated job offers included (in order from most to least important) a collegial environment, geographic location, emphasis on best patient care, quality of support staff and facility, and multidisciplinary approach to patient care. Factors that were rated significantly different between subgroups based on the type of position applied for included adequate mentoring, dedicated research time, access to clinical trials, amount of time it takes to become a partner, geographic location, size of group, starting salary, and amount of vacation and days off. Conclusions: The residents' perspective on the job application process over 2 years is documented to provide a resource for current and future residents and employers to use. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 32
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Results of the 2013 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology Career planning Survey of Practicing Physicians in the United States
    Mattes, Malcolm D.
    Golden, Daniel W.
    Mohindra, Pranshu
    Kharofa, Jordan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 11 (08) : 817 - 823
  • [2] Results of the 2003 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) surveys of residents and chief residents in the United States
    Jagsi, R
    Buck, DA
    Singh, AK
    Engleman, M
    Thakkar, V
    Frank, SJ
    Flynn, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03): : 642 - 648
  • [3] Results of the 2004 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) survey
    Patel, Shilpen
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Wilson, John
    Frank, Steven
    Thakkar, Vipul V.
    Hansen, Eric K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2006, 66 (04): : 1199 - 1203
  • [4] RESULTS OF THE 1992 ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY (ARRO) SURVEY
    SCHILLING, PJ
    WALL, TJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (05): : 1267 - 1270
  • [5] Results of the 2013-2015 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology Survey of Chief Residents in the United States
    Nabavizadeh, Nima
    Burt, Lindsay M.
    Mancini, Brandon R.
    Morris, Zachary S.
    Walker, Amanda J.
    Miller, Seth M.
    Bhavsar, Shripal
    Mohindra, Pranshu
    Kim, Miranda B.
    Kharofa, Jordan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 94 (02): : 228 - 234
  • [6] Results of the 1993 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology survey
    Ling, SM
    Flynn, DF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 34 (01): : 221 - 226
  • [7] RESULTS OF THE 1989 ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY SURVEY
    CORN, BW
    TAYLOR, BW
    KNOX, SJ
    MARTZ, KL
    FLYNN, DF
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (06): : 1363 - 1367
  • [8] Special report: Results of the 2000-2002 Association of Residents in Radiation Oncology (ARRO) surveys
    Jagsi, R
    Chronowski, GM
    Buck, DA
    Kang, S
    Palermo, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (01): : 313 - 318
  • [9] Burnout Evaluation of Radiation Residents Nationwide: Results of a Survey of United States Residents
    Ramey, Stephen J.
    Ahmed, Awad A.
    Takita, Cristiane
    Wilson, Lynn D.
    Thomas, Charles R., Jr.
    Yechieli, Raphael
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (03): : 530 - 538
  • [10] RESULTS OF THE 2005-2008 ASSOCIATION OF RESIDENTS IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY SURVEY OF CHIEF RESIDENTS IN THE UNITED STATES: CLINICAL TRAINING AND RESIDENT WORKING CONDITIONS
    Gondi, Vinai
    Bernard, Johnny Ray, Jr.
    Jabbari, Siavash
    Keam, Jennifer
    Bernstein, Karen L. de Amorim
    Dad, Luqman K.
    Li, Linna
    Poppe, Matthew M.
    Strauss, Jonathan B.
    Chollet, Casey T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (04): : 1120 - 1127