Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and hypoglycemic safety of gliclazide versus other insulinotropic agents

被引:57
|
作者
Chan, Siew Pheng [1 ]
Colagiuri, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Dept Med, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Sydney, Boden Inst, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Gliclazide; Insulinotropic; Efficacy; Hypoglycemia; AMERICAN-DIABETES-ASSOCIATION; EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION; POSITION STATEMENT; GLUCOSE CONTROL; TYPE-2; METFORMIN; SULFONYLUREAS; MANAGEMENT; COMBINATION; HYPERGLYCEMIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2015.07.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims: Sulfonylureas are well positioned in treating type 2 diabetes, after lifestyle modification and metformin. The sulfonylurea gliclazide was given preference over glibenclamide in older people with type 2 diabetes in the World Health Organization model list of essential medicines. Consequently, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the efficacy and safety of gliclazide versus other oral insulinotropic agents (sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and glinides) was performed. Methods: Two reviewers searched MEDLINE for studies of >= 12 weeks duration in adults with type 2 diabetes. The key search word was "gliclazide", filtered with "randomized controlled trial", "human" and "19+ years". Differences were explored in mean change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline (primary outcome) and risk of hypoglycemia (secondary outcome) between gliclazide and other oral insulinotropic agents; and other sulfonylureas. Results: Nine out of 181 references reported primary outcomes, of which 7 reported secondary outcomes. Gliclazide lowered HbA(1c) more than other oral insulinotropic agents, with a weighted mean difference of -0.11% (95%, CI -0.19 to -0.03%, P = 0.008, I-2 = 60%), though not more than other sulfonylureas (-0.12%; 95%, CI -0.25 to 0.01%, P = 0.07, I-2 = 77%). Risk of hypoglycemia with gliclazide was not different to other insulinotropic agents (RR 0.85; 95%, CI 0.66 to 1.09, P = 0.20, I-2 = 61%) but significantly lower than other sulfonylureas (RR 0.47; 95%, CI 0.27 to 0.79, P = 0.004, I-2 = 0%). Conclusion: Compared with other oral insulinotropic agents, gliclazide significantly reduced HbA(1c) with no difference regarding hypoglycemia risk. Compared with other sulfonylureas, HbA(1c) reduction with gliclazide was not significantly different, but hypoglycemia risk was significantly lower. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 81
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of biological agents for pemphigoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin, Zhipeng
    Zhao, Yixin
    Li, Feng
    Li, Jinzhuo
    Huang, Xianqiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 62 (08) : 1000 - 1008
  • [2] The efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin combined with oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xu, Xuezhong
    Xu, Wen
    Zhuo, Qingqing
    Yan, Yan
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (03) : 1028 - 1037
  • [3] Efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus other spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Bin
    Xu, Shuai
    Guo, Chen
    Jin, Linyu
    Liu, Chenjun
    Liu, Haiying
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [4] Efficacy and Safety of Biologic Agents for Lupus Nephritis A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chen, Pang
    Zhou, Yadong
    Wu, Lianghua
    Chen, Shihan
    Han, Fangduo
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 29 (02) : 95 - 100
  • [5] Safety and Efficacy of Gliclazide as Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Landman, Gijs W. D.
    de Bock, Geertruide H.
    Van Hateren, Kornelis J. J.
    Van Dijk, Peter R.
    Groenier, Klaas H.
    Gans, Rijk O. B.
    Houweling, Sebastiaan T.
    Bilo, Henk J. G.
    Kleefstra, Nanne
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [6] Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin versus Teicoplanin: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Svetitsky, Shuli
    Leibovici, Leonard
    Paul, Mical
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (10) : 4069 - 4079
  • [7] Paroxetine versus placebo and other agents for depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Katzman, Martin A.
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    McIntosh, Diane
    Filteau, Marie J.
    Bleau, Pierre
    Chokka, Pratap R.
    Kjernisted, Kevin D.
    Mok, Hiram
    Pham, Ba'
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 68 (12) : 1845 - 1859
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of the newer oral hypoglycemic agents in patients with T2DM during Ramadan: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gad, Hoda
    Hayat, Tabraiz
    Al-Muhannadi, Hamad
    Malik, Balal Rasheed
    Mussleman, Paul
    Malik, Rayaz A.
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 172
  • [9] Exploring the efficacy and safety of neuroprotective agents in optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alsubhi, Abdulrahman Hameed
    Althagafi, Mohammed Khalid
    Alhamed, Latifah
    Alothman, Rahaf Ali
    Alothman, Abdulrahman Ali Ahmed
    Alghorair, Abdullah Saeed
    Alruwaili, Shahad Abdullah
    Badeeb, Nooran
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 45 (01)
  • [10] Efficacy of Liraglutide Versus Gliclazide in Treatment of Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kamal, Manar Ahmed
    Al-Arawi, Raneem Mahmoud
    Kamal, Mohamed Ahmed
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 254 : 236 - 236