Usefulness of the acromioclavicular joint cross-sectional area as a diagnostic image parameter of acromioclavicular osteoarthritis

被引:1
|
作者
Joo, Young [1 ]
Moon, Jee Youn [2 ]
Han, Jung Youn [3 ]
Bang, Yun-Sic [3 ]
Kang, Keum Nae [4 ]
Lim, Young Su [5 ]
Choi, Young-Soon [5 ]
Kim, Young-Uk [5 ]
机构
[1] CHA Univ, CHA Ilsan Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Ilsan 10414, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Coll Med, Seoul 03080, South Korea
[3] CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seongnam 13496, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[4] Natl Police Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul 05715, South Korea
[5] Catholic Kwandong Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Int St Marys Hosp, Incheon 22711, South Korea
关键词
Acromioclavicular joint; Osteoarthritis; Cross-sectional area; Diagnosis; SHOULDER; PAIN; MRI;
D O I
10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2087
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) space narrowing has been considered to be an important diagnostic image parameter of ACJ osteoarthritis (ACJO). However, the morphology of the ACJ space is irregular because of osteophyte formation, subchondral irregularity, capsular distention, sclerosis, and erosion. Therefore, we created the ACJ cross-sectional area (ACJCSA) as a new diagnostic image parameter to assess the irregular morphologic changes of the ACJ. AIM To hypothesize that the ACJCSA is a new diagnostic image parameter for ACJO. METHODS ACJ samples were obtained from 35 patients with ACJO and 30 healthy individuals who underwent shoulder magnetic resonance (S-MR) imaging that revealed no evidence of ACJO. Oblique coronal, T2-weighted, fat-suppressed S-MR images were acquired at the ACJ level from the two groups. We measured the ACJCSA and the ACJ space width (ACJSW) at the ACJ on the S-MR images using our imaging analysis program. The ACJCSA was measured as the cross-sectional area of the ACJ. The ACJSW was measured as the narrowest point between the acromion and the clavicle. RESULTS The average ACJCSA was 39.88 +/- 10.60 mm(2) in the normal group and 18.80 +/- 5.13 mm(2) in the ACJO group. The mean ACJSW was 3.51 +/- 0.58 mm in the normal group and 2.02 +/- 0.48 mm in the ACJO group. ACJO individuals had significantly lower ACJCSA and ACJSW than the healthy individuals. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated that the most suitable ACJCSA cutoff score was 26.14 mm(2), with 91.4% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity. CONCLUSION The optimal ACJSW cutoff score was 2.37 mm, with 88.6% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity. Even though both the ACJCSA and ACJSW were significantly associated with ACJO, the ACJCSA was a more sensitive diagnostic image parameter.
引用
收藏
页码:2087 / 2094
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Usefulness of the acromioclavicular joint cross-sectional area as a diagnostic image parameter of acromioclavicular osteoarthritis
    Young Joo
    Jee Youn Moon
    Jung Youn Han
    Yun-Sic Bang
    Keum Nae Kang
    Young Su Lim
    Young-Soon Choi
    Young-Uk Kim
    World Journal of Clinical Cases, 2022, 10 (07) : 2087 - 2094
  • [2] Diagnostic value of a preoperative acromioclavicular injection for symptomatic acromioclavicular osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of cross-sectional midterm outcomes
    Vossen, Roderick Jan Maximiliaan
    Puijk, Raymond
    Sierevelt, Inger Nicoline
    Van Noort, Arthur
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2024, 27 (01): : 45 - 51
  • [3] OSTEOARTHRITIS OF ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT
    WORCESTER, JN
    GREEN, DP
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1968, (58) : 69 - +
  • [4] Injury patterns of the acromioclavicular ligament complex in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a cross-sectional, fundamental study
    Dirk Maier
    Martin Jaeger
    Kilian Reising
    Matthias J. Feucht
    Norbert P. Südkamp
    Kaywan Izadpanah
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17
  • [5] Injury patterns of the acromioclavicular ligament complex in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a cross-sectional, fundamental study
    Maier, Dirk
    Jaeger, Martin
    Reising, Kilian
    Feucht, Matthias J.
    Suedkamp, Norbert P.
    Izadpanah, Kaywan
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17
  • [6] The value of the glenohumeral joint cross-sectional area as a morphological parameter of glenohumeral osteoarthritis
    Bang, Yun-Sic
    Lee, Da Yeong
    Kim, Taeyeun
    Su, Min-Ying
    Park, SoYoon
    Lee, Sooho
    Yi, Jungmin
    Kim, Hyunhae
    Kim, Young Uk
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (47) : E31424
  • [7] Ultrasonography as a diagnostic modality in acromioclavicular joint pathologies
    Blankstein, A
    Ganel, A
    Givon, U
    Dudkiewicz, I
    Perry, M
    Diamant, L
    Chechik, A
    ISRAEL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2005, 7 (01): : 28 - 30
  • [8] Diagnostic values of tests for acromioclavicular joint pain
    Walton, J
    Mahajan, S
    Paxinos, A
    Marshall, J
    Bryant, C
    Shnier, R
    Quinn, R
    Murrell, GAC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (04): : 807 - 812
  • [9] Limited distal clavicle excision of acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis
    Gokkus, K.
    Saylik, M.
    Atmaca, H.
    Sagtas, E.
    Aydin, A. T.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (03) : 311 - 318
  • [10] A systematic review of the treatment of primary acromioclavicular joint osteoarthritis
    Welch, Matthew
    Rankin, Sally
    How Saw Keng, Matthew
    Woods, David
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2024, 16 (02) : 129 - 144