A Comparison of Screening Practices for Adolescents in Primary Care After Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment

被引:10
|
作者
Monico, Laura B. [1 ]
Mitchell, Shannon Gwin [1 ]
Dusek, Kristi [1 ]
Gryczynski, Jan [1 ]
Schwartz, Robert P. [1 ]
Oros, Marla [2 ]
Hosler, Colleen [2 ]
O'Grady, Kevin E. [3 ]
Brown, Barry S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Friends Res Inst, 1040 Pk Ave,Suite 103, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Mosa Grp, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Wilmington, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Substance use; Screening; Prevention; Adolescent health; SBIRT; BRIEF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVENTION; ALCOHOL-USE; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; YOUNG-ADULTS; DRINKING; YOUTH; TOBACCO; TEENS; CONSEQUENCES; PEDIATRICIAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.005
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Purpose: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening adolescents for substance use at all well-child and appropriate acute-care visits. However, many pediatric practices aim for such screenings annually at well-child visits. Methods: As part of a larger study, 7 urban Federally Qualified Health Center clinics implemented universal screening for risky alcohol and drug use using the Car, Relax, Alone, Forget, Friends, Trouble (CRAFFT) screening tool. The present study compared uptake of screening and screening results at well-child versus acute-care visits. Results: Over a period of 13 months for which encounter-level electronic medical records data were available, there were 6,346 clinic visits by 3,475 unique patients aged 12-17 years, at which 76.6% (n = 4,865) of visits had a screening for problematic substance use conducted. Rates of screening were 95.1% (2,750/2,891 involving 2,629 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 61.2% (2,115/3,455 involving 1,535 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Rates of positive screening results were 9.0% (248/2,750 involving 245 unique adolescents) for well-child visits and 7.8% (164/2,115 involving 126 unique adolescents) for acute-care visits. Of the 469 unique adolescents screened only during an acute-care visit during that same period, 40 unique adolescents had positive screening results for a positive screening rate of 8.5%. Conclusions: Nearly 10% of adolescent patients screened only at acute-care visits would not have been screened if screening was implemented solely at well-child visits, and 40 adolescents reporting substance use would have been missed. The findings highlight the benefits of screening adolescents at every primary care visit to better detect and intervene in adolescents' substance use. (C) 2018 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 50
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Adolescents in Pediatric Primary Care A Cluster Randomized Trial
    Sterling, Stacy
    Kline-Simon, Andrea H.
    Satre, Derek D.
    Jones, Ashley
    Mertens, Jennifer
    Wong, Anna
    Weisner, Constance
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2015, 169 (11) : e153145
  • [2] Prevention and Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Substance Use in Primary Care
    Strobbe, Stephen
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE, 2014, 41 (02): : 185 - +
  • [3] A controlled trial of screening, brief intervention and referral for treatment (SBIRT) implementation in primary care in the United Arab Emirates
    Matheson, Catriona
    Pflanz-Sinclair, Christiane
    Almarzouqi, Amna
    Bond, Christine M.
    Lee, Amanda J.
    Batieha, Anwar
    Al Ghaferi, H.
    El Kashef, A.
    [J]. PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 19 (02): : 165 - 175
  • [4] Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
    Borus, Joshua
    Parhami, Iman
    Levy, Sharon
    [J]. CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 25 (04) : 579 - +
  • [5] Connecting patients to services: Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in primary health care
    Agley, Jon
    McIntire, Russell
    DeSalle, Mallori
    Tidd, David
    Wolf, Jim
    Gassman, Ruth
    [J]. DRUGS-EDUCATION PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2014, 21 (05) : 370 - 379
  • [6] Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment for Adolescents: Companion Clinical Case
    Levy, Sharon
    Williams, Janet F.
    Knight, John R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2008, 2 (04) : 222 - 226
  • [7] USING SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION, AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT TO BUILD INROADS WITH ADOLESCENTS
    Hinckley, Jesse D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 59 (10): : S127 - S128
  • [8] SUBSTANCE SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION, AND REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (SBIRT): IS IT WORKING FOR ADOLESCENTS?
    Hinckley, Jesse
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 60 (10): : S103 - S103
  • [9] Addressing Substance Use in Adolescents: Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
    Inman, Dianna
    El-Mallakh, Peggy
    Jensen, Lynne
    Ossege, Julie
    Scott, Leslie
    [J]. JNP- THE JOURNAL FOR NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2020, 16 (01): : 69 - 73
  • [10] Successful Implementation of an Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment Program
    Zimmermann, Eric
    Sample, Jason M.
    Zimmermann, Mary Ellen
    Sullivan, Francesca
    Stankiewicz, Sarah
    Saldinger, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA NURSING, 2018, 25 (03) : 196 - 200