Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome

被引:124
|
作者
Chevret, Sylvie [1 ]
Hughes, Richard A. C. [2 ]
Annane, Djillali [3 ]
机构
[1] Hop St Louis, Dept Biostat & Informat Med, F-75475 Paris, France
[2] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, MRC Ctr Neuromuscular Dis, London, England
[3] Hop Raymond Poincare, AP HP, Crit Care Dept, 104 Blvd Raymond Poincare, F-92380 Garches, Ile De France, France
关键词
Plasma Exchange; Guillain-Barre Syndrome [immunology; therapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Treatment Outcome; Humans; INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; PLASMAPHERESIS; THERAPY; SERUM;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD001798.pub3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is an acute paralysing disease caused by peripheral nerve inflammation. This is an update of a review first published in 2001 and last updated in 2012. Objectives To assess the effects of plasma exchange for treating GBS. Search methods On 18 January 2016 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. We also searched clinical trials registries. Selection criteria Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of plasma exchange versus sham exchange or supportive treatment, or comparing different regimens or techniques of plasma exchange. Data collection and analysis We followed standard Cochrane methodology. Main results In the first version of this review there were six eligible trials concerning 649 participants comparing plasma exchange with supportive treatment. No new eligible trials have been identified in subsequent updates. Two other studies compared different numbers of plasma exchanges. Overall the included trials had a moderate risk of bias (in general, the studies were at low risk but all had a high risk of bias from lack of blinding). In one trial with 220 severely affected participants, the median time to recover walking with aid was significantly shorter with plasma exchange (30 days) than without plasma exchange (44 days). In another trial with 91 mildly affected participants, the median time to onset of motor recovery was significantly shorter with plasma exchange (six days) than without plasma exchange (10 days). After four weeks, moderate-quality evidence from the combined data of three trials accounting for a total of 349 patients showed that plasma exchange significantly increased the proportion of patients who recovered the ability to walk with assistance (risk ratio (RR) 1.60, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 2.15). In five trials with 623 participants in total, moderate-quality evidence showed that the RR for improvement by one or more disability grades after four weeks was 1.64 (95% CI 1.37 to 1.96) times greater with plasma exchange. Participants treated with plasma exchange also fared better, according to moderate-quality evidence, in time to recover walking without aid (three trials with 349 participants; RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.79) and requirement for artificial ventilation (five trials with 623 participants; RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.74). More participants had relapses by the end of follow-up in the plasma exchange group than in the control group (six trials with 649 participants; RR 2.89, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.93; moderate-quality evidence). Despite this, according to moderate-quality evidence, the likelihood of full muscle strength recovery at one year was greater with plasma exchange than without plasma exchange (five trials with 404 participants; RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.45), and the likelihood of severe motor sequelae was less (six trials with 649 participants; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.96). High-quality evidence from six trials with 649 participants could not confirm or refute a lower risk of death following plasma exchange compared to control (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.65). Three trials (N = 556) provided details of serious adverse events during the hospital stay; combined analyses found no increase in serious infectious events compared to the control group (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.13), nor were there clear differences in blood pressure instability, cardiac arrhythmias or pulmonary emboli. Authors' conclusions Moderate-quality evidence shows significantly more improvement with plasma exchange than with supportive care alone in adults with Guillain-Barre syndrome, without a significant increase in serious adverse events. According to moderate-quality evidence, there was a small but significant increase in the risk of relapse during the first six to 12 months after onset in people treated with plasma exchange compared with those who were not treated. Despite this, after one year, full recovery of muscle strength was more likely and severe residual weakness less likely with plasma exchange.
引用
收藏
页数:54
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Plasma exchange for Guillain-Barre syndrome
    Raphael, Jean Claude
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Hughes, Richard Ac
    Annane, Djillali
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (07):
  • [2] Treatment of the adult Guillain-Barre syndrome: indications for plasma exchange
    Raphael, JC
    Chevret, S
    Auriant, I
    Sharshar, T
    Bouget, J
    Bolgert, F
    [J]. TRANSFUSION SCIENCE, 1999, 20 (01): : 53 - 61
  • [3] Guillain-Barre Syndrome Treated by Membrane Plasma Exchange and/or Immunoadsorption
    Pernat, Andreja Marn
    Buturovic-Ponikvar, Jadranka
    Svigelj, Viktor
    Ponikvar, Rafael
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC APHERESIS AND DIALYSIS, 2009, 13 (04) : 310 - 313
  • [4] SMALL VOLUME PLASMA EXCHANGE IN THE TREATMENT OF GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME
    Kannan, M. A.
    Mohammad, S. R.
    Bonagiri, S.
    Kandadai, R. M.
    Jabeen, S. A.
    Yuki, N.
    Durga, P.
    Borgohain, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2015, 20 (02) : 166 - 166
  • [5] Treatments of adult Guillain-Barre syndrome: indications of plasma exchange
    Raphael, JC
    Chevret, S
    Auriant, I
    Sharshar, T
    Bouget, J
    Bolgert, F
    [J]. REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE, 1998, 19 (01): : 60 - 68
  • [6] Beneficial effect of plasma exchange in patients with severe Guillain-Barre syndrome
    Kirin, M.
    Cabrijan, Z.
    Juric, K.
    Sokol, I.
    Kardum, D.
    Kirin, I.
    [J]. NEUROLOGIA CROATICA, 2002, 51 : 95 - 100
  • [7] Pharmacoeconomics of therapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome: plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin
    Tsai, Ching-Piao
    Wang, Kai-Chen
    Liu, Chih-Yang
    Sheng, Wen-Yung
    Lee, Tzu-Chi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 14 (07) : 625 - 629
  • [8] Cost analysis of plasma exchange therapy for the treatment of Guillain-Barre syndrome
    Guha A.
    [J]. Critical Care, 3 (1):
  • [9] Successful Plasma Exchange in a Pregnant Patient with Guillain-Barre Syndrome and Thyrotoxicosis
    Toydemir, Hulya E.
    Yayla, Vildan
    Mercan, Metin
    Erdogan, Haci Ali
    Acir, Ibrahim
    Hursitoglu, Mehmet
    Mert, Meral
    Ozdemir, Bahar
    Seker, Yasemin Tekdos
    Bilgi, Deniz Ozel
    Hergunsel, Gulsum O.
    Topkarci, Zeynep
    [J]. ANNALS OF INDIAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY, 2022, 25 (03) : 524 - +
  • [10] Effectiveness of limited plasma exchange (LPE) in Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS)
    Aung, Yan Lynn
    Ohnmar, Ohnmar
    Hlaing, Win Aye
    Aye, Seinn Mya Mya
    Umapathi, Thirugnanam
    Thit, Win Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2018, 23 (04) : 314 - 314