State renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness

被引:386
|
作者
Carley, Sanya [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Publ Policy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Sustainable Energy Environm & Econ Dev, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Renewable portfolio standard; Renewable energy; State electricity policy; PORTFOLIO STANDARD; WIND POWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.062
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Over the past decade, state governments have emerged as US energy policy leaders. Across the country, states are adopting policy instruments aimed at carbon mitigation and renewable energy deployment. One of the most prevalent and innovative policy instruments is a renewable portfolio standard (RPS), which seeks to increase the share of renewable energy electrification in the electricity market. This analysis evaluates the effectiveness of state energy programs with an empirical investigation of the linkage between state RPS policy implementation and the percentage of renewable energy electricity generation across states. We use a variant of a standard fixed effects model, referred to as a fixed effects vector decomposition, with state-level data from 1998 to 2006. Results indicate that RPS implementation is not a significant predictor of the percentage of renewable energy generation out of the total generation mix, yet for each additional year that a state has an RPS policy, they are found to increase the total amount of renewable energy generation. These findings reveal a potentially significant shortcoming of RPS policies. Political institutions, natural resource endowments, deregulation, gross state product per capita, electricity use per person, electricity price, and the presence of regional RPS policies are also found to be significantly related to renewable energy deployment. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3071 / 3081
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] US state policies for renewable energy: Context and effectiveness
    Delmas, Magali A.
    Montes-Sancho, Maria J.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2273 - 2288
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies
    Palmer, K
    Burtraw, D
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (06) : 873 - 894
  • [3] Renewable electricity policies, heterogeneity, and cost effectiveness
    Fell, Harrison
    Linn, Joshua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (03) : 688 - 707
  • [5] Evaluation of renewable energy policies in Turkey with sectoral electricity demand forecasting
    Fatih Soğukpınar
    Gökhan Erkal
    Hüseyin Özer
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 35891 - 35912
  • [6] Evaluation of renewable energy policies in Turkey with sectoral electricity demand forecasting
    Sogukpinar, Fatih
    Erkal, Gokhan
    Ozer, Huseyin
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (13) : 35891 - 35912
  • [7] The Effectiveness of China's Renewable Energy Policy: An Empirical Evaluation of Wind Power Based on the Framework of Renewable Energy Law and Its Accompanying Policies
    Liu, Wenfeng
    Zhang, Xingping
    Bu, Yinhe
    Feng, Sida
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2021, 57 (03) : 757 - 772
  • [8] Effectiveness of Different Government Renewable Energy Policies
    Bollino, Carlo Andrea
    Micheli, Silvia
    [J]. ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 40 (02) : 217 - 218
  • [9] Renewable energy electricity state level policies in the WRAP region: What, why and maybe how
    Ratliff, N
    Smith, DH
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES, 2005, 27 (05): : 431 - 444
  • [10] RENEWABLE ELECTRICITY IN WESTERN BALKANS Support Policies and Current State
    Rakic, Nikola Z.
    Gordic, Dusan R.
    Sustersic, Vanja M.
    Josijevic, Mladen M.
    Babic, Milun J.
    [J]. THERMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 22 (06): : 2281 - 2296