A review of the assessments of the major fisheries resources in South Africa

被引:18
|
作者
de Moor, C. L. [1 ]
Johnston, S. J. [1 ]
Brandao, A. [1 ]
Rademeyer, R. A. [1 ]
Glazer, J. P. [2 ]
Furman, L. B. [1 ]
Butterworth, D. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Math & Appl Math, Marine Resource Assessment & Management Grp MARAM, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Dept Agr Forestry & Fisheries, Branch Fisheries Management, Cape Town, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
abalone; anchovy; assessment methods; assessment uncertainty; hake; horse mackerel; kingklip; monkfish; Patagonian toothfish; rock lobster; sardine; squid; stock status; DISSOSTICHUS-ELEGINOIDES RESOURCE; MANAGEMENT PROCEDURE APPROACH; LOLIGO-VULGARIS-REYNAUDII; ROCK LOBSTER; SARDINE; ANCHOVY; IMPACT; CATCH;
D O I
10.2989/1814232X.2015.1070201
中图分类号
Q17 [水生生物学];
学科分类号
071004 ;
摘要
The waters off South Africa's coastline boast a rich mix of commercially fished species. Quantitative assessments of these marine resources have developed from simple methods first applied in the 1970s, to models that encompass a wide range of methodologies. The more valuable resources have undergone regular assessments in recent decades, with frequencies closely related to the management approach employed for each fishery. Many of these assessments form the operating models used to simulation-test candidate management procedures. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the assessments of 11 of the most important fisheries resources in South Africa. Some assessments use simple biomass dynamics models, whereas others are a hybrid of age- and length-based models, each designed to model the specific characteristics of the resource and fishery concerned. Many of the assessments have been disaggregated by species/stock and/or area as related multispecies/stock/distribution hypotheses have arisen. This paper explores the similarities and differences in the data available and the methods applied. The review indicates that, whereas the status of three of these resources cannot be estimated reliably at present, the status of six resources is considered to be reasonable to good, whereas that of abalone Haliotis midae and West Coast rock lobster Jasus lalandii remains poor.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 311
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The use of water resources for inland fisheries in South Africa
    McCafferty, J. R.
    Ellender, B. R.
    Weyl, O. L. F.
    Britz, P. J.
    WATER SA, 2012, 38 (02) : 327 - 343
  • [2] Health resources for South Africa: A scoping review
    Pascoe, Michelle
    Mahura, Olebeng
    Dean, Jessica
    HEALTH SA GESONDHEID, 2020, 25 : 1 - 7
  • [3] A REVIEW ON MANAGEMENT OF WATER RESOURCES IN SOUTH AFRICA
    Sinha, Pramod
    Kumar, Rajesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2019, 10 (04) : 821 - 840
  • [4] INSHORE FISHERIES OF SOUTH AFRICA
    Scott, Peter
    ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 1951, 27 (02) : 123 - 147
  • [5] Progress and problems in the application of management procedures to South Africa's major fisheries
    De Oliveira, JAA
    Butterworth, DS
    Johnston, SJ
    FISHERY STOCK ASSESSMENT MODELS, 1998, 15 : 513 - 530
  • [6] Impacts of mining on water resources in South Africa: A review
    Ochieng, George M.
    Seanego, Ephrahim S.
    Nkwonta, Onyeka I.
    SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ESSAYS, 2010, 5 (22): : 3351 - 3357
  • [7] South Africa's offshore living marine resources: The scientific basis for management of the fisheries
    Cochrane, KL
    Butterworth, DS
    Payne, AIL
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF SOUTH AFRICA, 1997, 52 : 149 - 176
  • [8] Subsistence fisheries in South Africa: A preface
    Branch, GM
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE-SUID-AFRIKAANSE TYDSKRIF VIR SEEWETENSKAP, 2002, 24 : 403 - 404
  • [9] A review of geriatric injuries at a major trauma centre in South Africa
    Da Costa, J-P
    Laing, J.
    Kong, V. Y.
    Bruce, J. L.
    Laing, G. L.
    Clarke, D. L.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 110 (01): : 44 - 48
  • [10] Mineral resources of South Africa
    Schultze, J. H.
    PETERMANNS MITTEILUNGEN, 1932, 78 (3-4): : 102 - 102