Bond Performance between Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete and Normal-Strength Concrete

被引:142
|
作者
Munoz, Miguel A. Carbonell [1 ]
Harris, Devin K. [2 ]
Ahlborn, Theresa M. [1 ]
Froster, David C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Charlottesville, VA 22904 USA
关键词
Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC); Bond repair; Slant-shear; Splitting tensile pull-off; Freeze-thaw cycles; REPAIR MATERIALS; SUBSTRATE; OLD;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000890
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ultrahigh-performance concrete (UHPC) exhibits several properties that make it appropriate for the rehabilitation of concrete structures. In this investigation, the application is focused on bridge deck overlays, but the study is equally applicable to other rehabilitation applications. Its negligible permeability makes this material suitable as a protective barrier that prevents any water or chemical penetration into the substrate. In addition, its ultra-high compressive strength and post-cracking tensile capacity could provide an improvement to the bearing capacity. However, for extensive acceptance, it has to be demonstrated that the bond between UHPC and normal strength concrete (NSC) offers a good long-term performance under a variety of operating conditions. The UHPC-NSC interface can experience high tensile, shear, and compressive stresses at both early and later life stages and the environmental conditions inherent to the operating environment. The success of the rehabilitation will depend on whether the bond interface can withstand the stress combinations subjected throughout its service-life owing to material incompatibilities or applied loads. This paper explores the bond characteristics between UHPC and NSC under varying stress configurations and environmental conditions. Variables, such as roughness degree of the concrete substrates, age of bond, exposure to freeze-thaw cycles and wetting conditions of the concrete substrate, were included in this study. The combination of splitting tensile test with 0, 300, 600, and 900 freeze-thaw cycles was carried out to assess the bond performance under severe environmental conditions. The slant-shear test was conducted with different interface angles to provide a broader understanding of the bond performance under several combinations of compression and shear stresses. In addition, measurements of the bond tensile strength, using the pull-off test, were used to provide data that can be correlated in the future with the other tests that only can be used in the laboratory. The experimental program showed that the bond performance between UHPC and NSC is adequate for bridge overlay applications, regardless of the degree of roughness of the concrete substrate, the age of the composite specimens, the exposure to freeze-thaw cycles, and the different loading configurations. The controlling factor was the strength gain of the UHPC at early ages relative to the strengths of the substrate. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bond Characteristics between High-Strength Bars and Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete
    Hu, Aoxiang
    Liang, Xingwen
    Shi, Qingxuan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2020, 32 (01)
  • [2] Review of the Interfacial Bonding Properties between Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete and Normal Concrete
    Xu, Liying
    Yao, Yong
    Li, Yuxiang
    Su, Jiazhan
    Wu, Yingxiong
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [3] Experimental Investigation of Direct Tension Bond Performance of High-Strength Concrete and Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Connections
    Semendary, Ali A.
    Hamid, Waleed
    Khoury, Issam
    Steinberg, Eric P.
    Walsh, Kenneth K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 31 (09)
  • [4] Study on the Flexural Performance of Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete–Normal Concrete Composite Slabs
    Sun, Zizhou
    Li, Xianjing
    Liu, Chao
    [J]. Materials, 2024, 17 (18)
  • [5] The Compressive Strength of High-Performance Concrete and Ultrahigh-Performance
    Kadri, E. H.
    Aggoun, S.
    Kenai, S.
    Kaci, A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 2012
  • [6] Interface Shear Strength between Ultra-High-Performance Concrete and Normal-Strength Concrete
    Youm, Hyun-Soo
    Lim, Woo-Young
    Hong, Sung-Gul
    Joh, Changbin
    [J]. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL, 2021, 118 (02) : 287 - 298
  • [7] Durability of an ultrahigh-performance concrete
    Graybeal, Benjamin
    Tanesi, Jussara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2007, 19 (10) : 848 - 854
  • [8] Concrete Bond and Behavior of Nonproprietary Ultrahigh-Performance Concrete Bridge Slab Joints
    Looney, Trevor
    Coleman, Raina
    Funderburg, Chandler
    Volz, Jeffery
    Floyd, Royce
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2021, 26 (02)
  • [9] Evaluation method of the synergistic service performance between ultrahigh-performance concrete and normal strength concrete based on the parameter of environmental equivalent force ratio
    Feng, Shuo
    Lyu, Jingjing
    Xiao, Huigang
    Zhang, Qingsong
    Li, Yifei
    [J]. CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2024, 150
  • [10] Comparative studies of the effect of ultrahigh-performance concrete and normal concrete as repair materials on interfacial bond properties and microstructure
    Feng, Shuo
    Xiao, Huigang
    Li, Hui
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 222 (222)