Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments

被引:117
|
作者
Nilver, Helena [1 ]
Begley, Cecily [1 ,2 ]
Berg, Marie [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Ctr Person Ctr Care GPCC, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Systematic review; Validated questionnaires; Measurement instruments; Psychometric properties; Childbirth experiences; Childbirth satisfaction; QUALITY-OF-CARE; MEASURING MATERNAL SATISFACTION; BIRTH EXPERIENCE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; PARENTAL-SATISFACTION; MEASUREMENT VALIDITY; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; INTRAPARTUM CARE; TURKISH VERSION; WOMANS LIFE;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Women's childbirth experience can have immediate as well as long-term positive or negative effects on their life, well-being and health. When evaluating and drawing conclusions from research results, women's experiences of childbirth should be one aspect to consider. Researchers and clinicians need help in finding and selecting the most suitable instrument for their purpose. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically identify and present validated instruments measuring women's childbirth experience. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in January 2016 with a comprehensive search in the bibliographic databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, The Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Included instruments measured women's childbirth experiences. Papers were assessed independently by two reviewers for inclusion, and quality assessment of included instruments was made by two reviewers independently and in pairs using Terwee et al's criteria for evaluation of psychometric properties. Results: In total 5189 citations were screened, of which 5106 were excluded by title and abstract. Eighty-three full-text papers were reviewed, and 37 papers were excluded, resulting in 46 included papers representing 36 instruments. These instruments demonstrated a wide range in purpose and content as well as in the quality of psychometric properties. Conclusions: This systematic review provides an overview of existing instruments measuring women's childbirth experiences and can support researchers to identify appropriate instruments to be used, and maybe adapted, in their specific contexts and research purpose.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments
    Helena Nilvér
    Cecily Begley
    Marie Berg
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [2] Instruments measuring pregnant women's expectations of labor and childbirth: A systematic review
    Marques, Gabriela M.
    Nascimento, Diego Z.
    Trevisol, Daisson J.
    Iser, Betine P. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 246 : 90 - 98
  • [3] Measuring women's experiences of maternity care: A systematic review of self-report survey instruments
    Beecher, Claire
    Greene, Richard
    O'Dwyer, Laura
    Ryan, Ethel
    White, Mark
    Beattie, Michelle
    Devane, Declan
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2021, 34 (03) : 231 - 241
  • [4] Nonpharmacological approaches to improve women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ghanbari-Homayi, Solmaz
    Hasani, Sonia
    Meedya, Shahla
    Jafarabadi, Mohammad Asghari
    Mirghafourvand, Mojgan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (03): : 479 - 491
  • [5] Measuring women’s experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
    Claire Beecher
    Richard Greene
    Laura O’Dwyer
    Ethel Ryan
    Mark White
    Michelle Beattie
    Declan Devane
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [6] Measuring women's experiences of maternity care: protocol for a systematic review of self-report survey instruments
    Beecher, Claire
    Greene, Richard
    O'Dwyer, Laura
    Ryan, Ethel
    White, Mark
    Beattie, Michelle
    Devane, Declan
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [7] Migrant women's experiences of pregnancy, childbirth and maternity care in European countries: A systematic review
    Fair, Frankie
    Raben, Liselotte
    Watson, Helen
    Vivilaki, Victoria
    van den Muijsenbergh, Maria
    Soltani, Hora
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02):
  • [8] A systematic mixed studies review of women's experiences of perineal trauma sustained during childbirth
    Crookall, Rebecca
    Fowler, Gillian
    Wood, Caroline
    Slade, Pauline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2018, 74 (09) : 2038 - 2052
  • [9] Key dimensions of women's and their partners' experiences of childbirth: A systematic review of reviews of qualitative studies
    Benyamini, Yael
    Delicate, Amy
    Ayers, Susan
    Dikmen-Yildiz, Pelin
    Gouni, Olga
    Jonsdottir, Sigridur Sia
    Karlsdottir, Sigfridur Inga
    Koemuercue Akik, Burcu
    Leinweber, Julia
    Murphy-Tighe, Sylvia
    Pajalic, Zada
    Riklikiene, Olga
    Limmer, Claudia Maria
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (03):
  • [10] Exploring Women's Childbirth Experiences in Labor Induction versus Expectant Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Adjie, J. M. Seno
    Catalina, R. Teresa
    Priscilla, Janice
    [J]. ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2024,