Spectrometric Classification of Bamboo Shoot Species by Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods

被引:5
|
作者
Tong, Long [1 ]
Li, Bin [1 ]
Geng, Yanhui [1 ]
Chen, Lijie [1 ]
Li, Yanjie [2 ]
Cao, Ruishu [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Acad Forestry, Chongqing 400036, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Subtrop Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Massey Univ, Inst Hort Sci, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand
关键词
NIR spectroscopy; Model; Bamboo shoot; Pre-processing method; Variable selection; NEAR-INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; NIR SPECTROSCOPY; REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; QUALITY; WOOD; SVM; DISCRIMINATION; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12161-020-01885-2
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The nutrition and quality of bamboo shoots from different species have a large variation, and traditional methods used for the classification of different bamboo shoot species are expensive and time-consuming. Here, the capability of near-infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy to identify bamboo shoot species in a time- and cost-effective manner was examined. The NIR spectra of four bamboo shoot species were collected. Three classification models, a support vector machine (SVM), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLSDA), and random forest (RF), were calibrated. Several spectra pre-processing methods and their combination were trained before model calibration for the best classification model collection; each model was run 200 times for the calculation of the prediction error and model stability checking. The SVM model combined with the Det+2nd derivative had the best performance with an overall accuracy of 0.95. The use of less than 16% of the full-length NIR spectra produced a similar high accuracy of 0.91. Eight important regions, 1015, 1135, 1175, 1338, 1380, 1620, 1690, and 1750 nm, were found to be highly related to the classification of bamboo shoots. This study found that NIR spectra combined with SVM methods produced a rapid and non-destructive approach for the classification of bamboo shoot species.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 306
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spectrometric Classification of Bamboo Shoot Species by Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods
    Long Tong
    Bin Li
    Yanhui Geng
    Lijie Chen
    Yanjie Li
    Ruishu Cao
    [J]. Food Analytical Methods, 2021, 14 : 300 - 306
  • [2] Comparison of Machine Learning Methods in Classification of Affective Disorders
    Kinder, I
    Friganovic, K.
    Vukojevic, J.
    Mulc, D.
    Slukan, T.
    Vidovic, D.
    Brecic, P.
    Cifrek, M.
    [J]. 2020 43RD INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY (MIPRO 2020), 2020, : 177 - 181
  • [3] Bayesian and Classical Machine Learning Methods: A Comparison for Tree Species Classification with LiDAR Waveform Signatures
    Zhou, Tan
    Popescu, Sorin C.
    Lawing, A. Michelle
    Eriksson, Marian
    Strimbu, Bogdan M.
    Buerkner, Paul C.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (01)
  • [4] Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods on Wisconsin Dataset
    Ivancakova, Juliana
    Babic, Frantisek
    Butka, Peter
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 16TH WORLD SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED MACHINE INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (SAMI 2018): DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF PIONEER OF ROBOTICS ANTAL (TONY) K. BEJCZY, 2018, : 173 - 177
  • [5] Performance of Different Machine Learning Methods for Sinus Diseases Classification
    Nuseir, Aya
    Nuseir, Amjad
    Alsmirat, Mohammad
    Al-Ayyoub, Mahmoud
    Mahdi, Mohammed
    Al-Balas, Hasan
    [J]. 2021 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS (ICICS), 2021, : 77 - 82
  • [6] Classification performance of machine learning methods in different data structures
    Aglarci, Ali Vasfi
    Bal, Cengiz
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2023, 53 (12) : 6471 - 6489
  • [7] Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Penaeid Prawn Species
    Sucharita, V.
    Jyothi, S.
    Rao, P. Venkateswara
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INDIACOM - 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 1610 - 1613
  • [8] Classification of Different Plant Species Using Deep Learning and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Chouhan, Siddharth Singh
    Singh, Uday Pratap
    Sharma, Utkarsh
    Jain, Sanjeev
    [J]. WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 136 (04) : 2275 - 2298
  • [9] Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods to Detect Fake News
    Badhe, Tanishka
    Borde, Janhavi
    Thakur, Vaishnavi
    Waghmare, Bhagyashree
    Chaudhari, Anagha
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTING AND APPLICATIONS, IBICA 2021, 2022, 419 : 65 - 77
  • [10] Comparison of different deep-learning methods for image classification
    Szyc, Kamil
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (INES 2018), 2018, : 341 - 346