Initial Prehospital Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) as a Predictor of Patient Outcomes

被引:11
|
作者
Crowe, Remle P. [1 ]
Bourn, Scott S. [1 ]
Fernandez, Antonio R. [1 ,2 ]
Myers, J. Brent [1 ]
机构
[1] ESO Inc, Austin, TX USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Emergency Medical Services; risk stratification; patient outcomes; prehospital; Subject Terms; Epidemiology; Risk Adjustment;
D O I
10.1080/10903127.2020.1862944
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: A standardized objective measure of prehospital patient risk of hospitalization or death is needed. The Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), a validated risk-stratification tool, has not been widely tested for prehospital use. This study's objective was to assess predictive characteristics of initial prehospital REMS for ED disposition and overall patient mortality. Methods: This retrospective analysis used linked prehospital and hospital data from the national ESO Data Collaborative. All 911 responses from 1/1/2019-12/31/2019 were included. REMS (0-26) was calculated using age and first prehospital values for: pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and Glasgow Coma Scale. Non-transports, patients <18 and cardiac arrests prior to EMS arrival were excluded. The primary outcome was ED disposition, dichotomized to discharge versus admission, transfer, or death. The secondary outcome was overall survival to discharge (ED or inpatient). Transfers and records without inpatient disposition were excluded from the secondary analysis. Predictive ability was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Optimal REMS cut points were determined using test characteristic curves. Univariable logistic regression modeling was used to quantify the association between initial prehospital REMS and each outcome. Results: Of 579,505 eligible records, 94,640 (16%) were excluded due to missing data needed to calculate REMS. Overall, 62% (n = 298,223) of patients were discharged from the ED, 36% (n = 175,212) were admitted, 2% (n = 10,499) were transferred, and 0.2% (n = 931) died in the ED. A REMS of 5 or lower demonstrated optimal statistical prediction for ED discharge versus not discharged (admission/transfer/death) (AUROC: 0.68). Patients with initial prehospital REMS of 5 or lower showed a three-fold increase in odds of ED discharge (OR: 3.28, 95%CI: 3.24-3.32). Of the 457,226 patients included in overall mortality analysis, >98% (n = 450,112) survived. AUROC of initial prehospital REMS for overall mortality was 0.79. A score 7 or lower was statistically optimal for predicting survival. Initial prehospital REMS of 7 or lower was associated with a five-fold increase in odds of overall survival (OR:5.41, 95%CI:5.15-5.69). Conclusion: Initial prehospital REMS was predictive of ED disposition and overall patient mortality, suggesting value as a risk-stratification measure for EMS agencies, systems and researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 65
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Initial prehospital Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) to predict outcomes for COVID-19 patients
    Bourn, Scott S.
    Crowe, Remle P.
    Fernandez, Antonio R.
    Matt, Sarah E.
    Brown, Andrew L.
    Hawthorn, Andrew B.
    Myers, J. Brent
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OPEN, 2021, 2 (04)
  • [2] Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) As a Predictor of Early Mortality in the Setting of Emergency Department
    Bidari, Ali
    Talachian, Elham
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 47 (02) : 81 - 82
  • [3] Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in the trauma population: a retrospective study
    Imhoff, Bryan F.
    Thompson, Nia J.
    Hastings, Michael A.
    Nazir, Niaman
    Moncure, Michael
    Cannon, Chad M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (05):
  • [4] The REMS score (Rapid Emergency Medicine Score) to predict the outcome of Covid-19 patients
    Groussac, M.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES DE MEDECINE D URGENCE, 2021, 11 (06): : 417 - 418
  • [5] Usability verification of the Emergency Trauma Score (EMTRAS) and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) in patients with trauma: A retrospective cohort study
    Park, Hyun Oh
    Kim, Jong Woo
    Kim, Sung Hwan
    Moon, Seong Ho
    Byun, Joung Hun
    Kim, Ki Nyun
    Yang, Jun Ho
    Lee, Chung Eun
    Jang, In Seok
    Kang, Dong Hun
    Kim, Seong Chun
    Kang, Changwoo
    Choi, Jun Young
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (44)
  • [6] Prognostic performance of the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and Worthing Physiological Scoring system (WPS) in emergency department
    Ha D.T.
    Dang T.Q.
    Tran N.V.
    Vo N.Y.
    Nguyen N.D.
    Nguyen T.V.
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2015, 8 (1)
  • [7] Evaluating clinical care in the prehospital setting: Is Rapid Emergency Medicine Score the missing metric of EMS?
    Alter, Scott M.
    Infinger, Allison
    Swanson, Doug
    Studnek, Jonathan R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (02): : 218 - 221
  • [8] Should lactate levels be combined with rapid emergency medicine scores (REMS) to predict outcomes of patients with dyspnea
    Vargun, Pinar
    Yilmaz, Sarper
    Tatliparmak, Ali Cankut
    Karcioglu, Ozgur
    SIGNA VITAE, 2023, 19 (05) : 161 - 168
  • [9] Performance of the Simple Clinical Score (SCS) and the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) to predict severity level and mortality rate among patients with sepsis in the emergency department
    Chatchumni, Manaporn
    Maneesri, Sangrawee
    Yongsiriwit, Karn
    AUSTRALASIAN EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 25 (02) : 121 - 125
  • [10] Rapid sequence induction in prehospital emergency medicine: Is it safe?
    Kill, C
    Wranze, E
    Wulf, H
    Geldner, G
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2004, 39 (11): : 668 - 671