A Prospective Observational Study Evaluating the Ability of Prelabor Psychological Tests to Predict Labor Pain, Epidural Analgesic Consumption, and Maternal Satisfaction

被引:23
|
作者
Carvalho, Brendan [1 ]
Zheng, Ming [1 ]
Aiono-Le Tagaloa, Leinani [2 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Auckland Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA | 2014年 / 119卷 / 03期
关键词
POSTCESAREAN SECTION PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; ANXIETY SENSITIVITY; CHILDBIRTH; FEAR; PERSONALITY; EXPERIENCE; RECOVERY; PREGNANCY; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1213/ANE.0000000000000357
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Psychological characteristics may affect interpretation and expression of pain. In this study, we sought to determine whether validated psychological tests predict the labor pain experience. METHODS: Thirty-nine women with singleton term or post-term pregnancies undergoing induction of labor and successful vaginal delivery comprised the study population for this prospective observational study. Four validated psychological questionnaires (Anxiety Sensitivity Index [ASI], Fear of Pain [FPQIII], Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS]), and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Short Scale) and 3-scaled ratings of anxiety, confidence, and analgesic expectations were completed before onset of labor. Outcome measures included time to epidural analgesia request, pain at request for epidural analgesia, area under the pain x time curve (AUC), epidural local anesthetic use per hour, and maternal satisfaction with analgesia. The relationship between psychological predictors and clinical responses was assessed using bivariate correlations and regression modeling. RESULTS: Labor pain AUC (R-2 = 0.45, P = 0.006), epidural local anesthetic use (R-2 = 0.45, P = 0.019), and time to epidural analgesia request (R-2 = 0.36, P = 0.015) were predicted with models incorporating some of the prelabor predictors. ASI, PCS, personality traits (lying, extroversion, psychoticism), and scaled ratings of anxiety, confidence, and analgesic expectations all contributed to the regression models of the outcomes. After proper model selection, neither FPQIII nor PCS was in the final multivariate linear regression model for labor pain AUC, although ASI was still included (P = 0.022). There was no significant correlation between ASI and self-reported anxiety (r = 0.03, P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Personality traits (psychoticism, extroversion, and lying), as well as scaled ratings of anxiety, confidence, and analgesia expectations, show some potential to predict labor pain, epidural local anesthetic use, and time to epidural analgesia request. Although ASI was included in the final model for labor pain AUC, and FPQ and PCS were not, further study is required to determine whether ASI is a better predictor than FPQ or PCS.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 640
页数:9
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Evaluation of experimental pain tests to predict labour pain and epidural analgesic consumption
    Carvalho, B.
    Zheng, M.
    Aiono-Le Tagaloa, L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (04) : 600 - 606
  • [2] A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Ability of Anticipated Pain, Perceived Analgesic Needs, and Psychological Traits to Predict Pain and Analgesic Usage following Cesarean Delivery
    Carvalho, Brendan
    Zheng, Ming
    Harter, Scott
    Sultan, Pervez
    ANESTHESIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2016, 2016
  • [3] Efficacy of epidural anesthesia in labor pain management: a prospective observational study
    Wang, Jiaolian
    Sun, Juyan
    Chen, Mengdie
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2024,
  • [4] Predictors of maternal satisfaction with labor induction: A prospective observational cohort study
    Ramlee, Nurbayani
    Azhary, Jerilee Mariam Khong
    Hamdan, Mukhri
    Saaid, Rahmah
    Gan, Farah
    Tan, Peng Chiong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 163 (02) : 547 - 554
  • [5] The influence of labor epidural analgesia on maternal, uteroplacental and fetoplacental hemodynamics in normotensive parturients: a prospective observational study
    Gude, P.
    Kaci, C. S. B.
    Sieker, M.
    Vogelsang, H.
    Bellgardt, M.
    Herzog-Niescery, J.
    Weber, T. P.
    Weber, J.
    Teubner, S.
    Kern, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2021, 45 : 83 - 89
  • [6] Labor epidural analgesia onset time and subsequent analgesic requirements: a prospective observational single-center cohort study
    Nevo, A.
    Aptekman, B.
    Goren, O.
    Matot, I.
    Weiniger, C. F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 40 : 39 - 44
  • [7] Impact of Labor Epidural Analgesia on Maternal Satisfaction and Childbirth Expectations in a Tertiary Care Center in Portugal: A Prospective Study
    Fernandes, Sofia
    Galacho, Joao
    Borrego, Andreia
    Pereira, Daniela
    Lanca, Filipa
    Ormonde, Lucindo
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2021, 34 (04): : 272 - 277
  • [8] Associations between postoperative analgesic consumption and distress tolerance, anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing: a prospective observational study
    Tapar, Hakan
    Ozsoy, Zeki
    Balta, Mehtap Gurler
    Dasiran, Fatih
    Tapar, Gulsen Genc
    Karamana, Tugba
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 72 (05): : 567 - 573
  • [9] A comparison of maternal fear of childbirth, labor pain intensity and intrapartum analgesic consumption between primiparas and multiparas: A cross-sectional study
    Deng, Yongfang
    Lin, Yan
    Yang, Liyuan
    Liang, Qiuxia
    Fu, Bailing
    Li, Huixian
    Zhang, Huizhu
    Liu, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCES, 2021, 8 (04) : 380 - 387
  • [10] Immunophenotyping and Activation Status of Maternal Lymphocytes to Predict Spontaneous Preterm Birth in Women With Threatened Preterm Labor: A Prospective Observational Study
    Wendremaire, Maeva
    Hadi, Tarik
    Lopez, Tatiana E.
    Guy, Julien
    Neiers, Fabrice
    Garrido, Carmen
    Simon, Emmanuel
    Jaffal, Zohra
    Bernigal, Virginie
    Bardou, Marc
    Lirussi, Frederic
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 92 (06)