Diagnostic Performance of Ultrafast Brain MRI for Evaluation of Abusive Head Trauma

被引:40
|
作者
Kralik, S. F. [1 ]
Yasrebi, M. [1 ]
Supakul, N. [1 ]
Lin, C. [1 ]
Netter, L. G. [1 ]
Hicks, R. A. [2 ]
Hibbard, R. A. [2 ]
Ackerman, L. L. [3 ]
Harris, M. L. [4 ]
Ho, C. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiol & Imaging Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Child Protect Program, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Neurol Surg, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[4] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
CLINICAL ARTICLE; CHILDREN; INJURY; HYDROCEPHALUS; INFANTS; QUICK; PREDICTION; CHILDHOOD; CT;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A5093
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging with sedation is commonly used to detect intracranial traumatic pathology in the pediatric population. Our purpose was to compare nonsedated ultrafast MR imaging, noncontrast head CT, and standard MR imaging for the detection of intracranial trauma in patients with potential abusive head trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 24 pediatric patients who were evaluated for potential abusive head trauma. All patients received noncontrast head CT, ultrafast brain MR imaging without sedation, and standard MR imaging with general anesthesia or an immobilizer, sequentially. Two pediatric neuroradiologists independently reviewed each technique blinded to other modalities for intracranial trauma. We performed interreader agreement and consensus interpretation for standard MR imaging as the criterion standard. Diagnostic accuracy was calculated for ultrafast MR imaging, noncontrast head CT, and combined ultrafast MR imaging and noncontrast head CT. RESULTS: Interreader agreement was moderate for ultrafast MR imaging (K = 0.42), substantial for noncontrast head CT (K = 0.63), and nearly perfect for standard MR imaging (K = 0.86). Forty-two percent of patients had discrepancies between ultrafast MR imaging and standard MR imaging, which included detection of subarachnoid hemorrhage and subdural hemorrhage. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were obtained for any traumatic pathology for each examination: ultrafast MR imaging (50%,100%,100%, 31%), noncontrast head CT (25%,100%,100%, 21%), and a combination of ultrafast MR imaging and noncontrast head CT (60%,100%,100%, 33%). Ultrafast MR imaging was more sensitive than noncontrast head CT for the detection of intraparenchymal hemorrhage (P =.03), and the combination of ultrafast MR imaging and noncontrast head CT was more sensitive than noncontrast head CT alone for intracranial trauma (P =.02). CONCLUSIONS: In abusive head trauma, ultrafast MR imaging, even combined with noncontrast head CT, demonstrated low sensitivity compared with standard MR imaging for intracranial traumatic pathology, which may limit its utility in this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 813
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic error in the evaluation of abusive head trauma
    Kelly, K. G.
    Herberger, L. S.
    Murray, L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 367 : S415 - S416
  • [2] Usefulness of MRI detection of cervical spine and brain injuries in the evaluation of abusive head trauma
    Kadom, Nadja
    Khademian, Zarir
    Vezina, Gilbert
    Shalaby-Rana, Eglal
    Rice, Amy
    Hinds, Tanya
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2014, 44 (07) : 839 - 848
  • [3] Usefulness of MRI detection of cervical spine and brain injuries in the evaluation of abusive head trauma
    Nadja Kadom
    Zarir Khademian
    Gilbert Vezina
    Eglal Shalaby-Rana
    Amy Rice
    Tanya Hinds
    [J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2014, 44 : 839 - 848
  • [4] Implementation of a brain injury screen MRI for infants at risk for abusive head trauma
    Rachel P. Berger
    Andre D. Furtado
    Lynda L. Flom
    Janet B. Fromkin
    Ashok Panigrahy
    [J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2020, 50 : 75 - 82
  • [5] Implementation of a brain injury screen MRI for infants at risk for abusive head trauma
    Berger, Rachel P.
    Furtado, Andre D.
    Flom, Lynda L.
    Fromkin, Janet B.
    Panigrahy, Ashok
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 50 (01) : 75 - 82
  • [6] Parenchymal brain injuries in abusive head trauma
    Adam J. Oates
    Jai Sidpra
    Kshitij Mankad
    [J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2021, 51 : 898 - 910
  • [7] Parenchymal brain injuries in abusive head trauma
    Oates, Adam J.
    Sidpra, Jai
    Mankad, Kshitij
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (06) : 898 - 910
  • [8] MRI Findings in Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma: A Review
    Orman, Gunes
    Kralik, Stephen F.
    Meoded, Avner
    Desai, Nilesh
    Risen, Sarah
    Huisman, Thierry A. G. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING, 2020, 30 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [9] Abusive head trauma: neuroimaging mimics and diagnostic complexities
    Jai Sidpra
    Sahil Chhabda
    Adam J. Oates
    Aashim Bhatia
    Susan I. Blaser
    Kshitij Mankad
    [J]. Pediatric Radiology, 2021, 51 : 947 - 965
  • [10] The need for rigorous diagnostic standards for abusive head trauma
    Squier, Waney
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2022, 111 (04) : 890 - 890