Behavioural coordination of dogs in a cooperative problem-solving task with a conspecific and a human partner

被引:62
|
作者
Ostojic, Ljerka [1 ]
Clayton, Nicola S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Psychol, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Dogs; Cooperative problem-solving; Domestication; Behavioural coordination; COMPARATIVE SOCIAL COGNITION; FAMILIARIS USE HUMAN; CANIS-FAMILIARIS; DOMESTIC DOGS; CHIMPANZEES; PERSPECTIVE; CONSTRAINTS; WOLVES; BARKS; WOLF;
D O I
10.1007/s10071-013-0676-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The process of domestication has arguably provided dogs (Canis familiaris) with decreased emotional reactivity (reduced fear and aggression) and increased socio-cognitive skills adaptive for living with humans. It has been suggested that dogs are uniquely equipped with abilities that have been identified as crucial in cooperative problem-solving, namely social tolerance and the ability to attend to other individuals' behaviour. Accordingly, dogs might be hypothesised to perform well in tasks in which they have to work together with a human partner. Recently, researchers have found that dogs successfully solved a simple cooperative task with another dog. Due to the simplicity of the task, this study was, however, unable to provide clear evidence as to whether the dogs' successful performance was based on the cognitive ability of behavioural coordination, namely the capacity to link task requirements to the necessity of adjusting one's actions to the partner's behaviour. Here, we tested dogs with the most commonly used cooperative task, appropriate to test behavioural coordination. In addition, we paired dogs with both a conspecific and a human partner. Although dogs had difficulties in inhibiting the necessary action when required to wait for their partner, they successfully attended to the two cues that predicted a successful outcome, namely their partner's behaviour and the incremental movement of rewards towards themselves. This behavioural coordination was shown with both a conspecific and a human partner, in line with the recent findings suggesting that dogs exhibit highly developed socio-cognitive skills in interactions with both humans and other dogs.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 459
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavioural coordination of dogs in a cooperative problem-solving task with a conspecific and a human partner
    Ljerka Ostojić
    Nicola S. Clayton
    Animal Cognition, 2014, 17 : 445 - 459
  • [2] Dogs understand the role of a human partner in a cooperative task
    Wallner Werneck Mendes, Juliana
    Vindevogel, Marie
    van Peer, Ilka
    Martinez, Mayte
    Cimarelli, Giulia
    Range, Friederike
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] THE EFFECTS OF VISIBILITY ON DIALOG AND PERFORMANCE IN A COOPERATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING TASK
    BOYLE, EA
    ANDERSON, AH
    NEWLANDS, A
    LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1994, 37 : 1 - 20
  • [4] A BLACKBOARD SCHEME FOR COOPERATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING BY HUMAN EXPERTS
    LONDONO, F
    CLEETUS, KJ
    REDDY, YV
    LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 1991, 492 : 26 - 50
  • [5] COOPERATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING AND EXPLANATION
    KARSENTY, L
    BREZILLON, PJ
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 1995, 8 (04) : 445 - 462
  • [6] The cooperative problem-solving process
    Wooldridge, M
    Jennings, NR
    JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 1999, 9 (04) : 563 - 592
  • [7] COOPERATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING SYSTEMS
    SMITH, PJ
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASIS ANNUAL MEETING, 1990, 27 : 361 - 361
  • [8] Dogs take into account the actions of a human partner in a cooperative task
    Martinez, Mayte
    Robinson, Lauren M.
    Brosnan, Sarah F.
    Range, Friederike
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 290 (1993)
  • [9] HUMAN PROBLEM-SOLVING PERFORMANCE IN A FAULT DIAGNOSIS TASK
    ROUSE, WB
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1978, 8 (04): : 258 - 271
  • [10] The virtue of problem-solving: Perceived partner virtues as predictors of problem-solving efficacy
    Veldorale-Brogan, Amanda
    Lambert, Nathaniel M.
    Fincham, Frank D.
    DeWall, C. Nathan
    PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2013, 20 (03) : 511 - 523