Anchoring in Mergers and Acquisitions: Does the Regulatory Environment Matter?

被引:1
|
作者
Ranganathan, Kavitha [1 ]
Singh, Poonam [2 ]
机构
[1] TA Pai Management Inst, Manipal, India
[2] Natl Inst Ind Engn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
来源
关键词
52-week high price; mergers and acquisitions; reference point; anchoring and adjustment; regulation; MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP; REFERENCE POINTS; STOCK; ATTENTION; RETURNS; FIRMS; POWER; CEOS;
D O I
10.1177/0148558X18798998
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the 52-week anchoring effect in the Indian takeover market that has a unique regulatory design. The Indian takeover regulation mandates the minimum offer price to be function of the target's 26-week or 60-day high price. We show that the 52-week anchoring effect is robust even in the face of other regulatory anchors that differ from the widely cited 52-week high price. The anchoring effect dominates when the offer price exceeds the 52-week high price. Regulatory intervention in 2011 that shifts the floor price to a recent market price, such as the 60-day high price, does not attenuate the 52-week anchoring effect. We infer that acquirers are willing to pay a higher premium while anchoring to the 52-week high price, even when the regulatory focus is on lower reference prices. Besides, regulatory anchors also serve as additional focal points, demonstrated by the significance of the 26-week high price during its own period of regulation (2002-2011).
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 171
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DOES DISTANCE MATTER IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS?
    Bick, Patty
    Crook, Matthew D.
    Lynch, Andrew A.
    Walkup, Brian R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH, 2017, 40 (01) : 33 - 54
  • [2] Mergers and acquisitions: does organizational socialization matter?
    Yalabik, Zeynep Y.
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 16 (05) : 519 - 537
  • [3] Mergers and acquisitions: does the legal origin matter?
    Ciobanu, Radu
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS QUERIES IN FINANCE AND BUSINESS 2014, EMQFB 2014, 2015, 32 : 1236 - 1247
  • [4] Does Bilateral Trust Matter During Mergers and Acquisitions Negotiations?
    Ahmad, Muhammad Farooq
    Aktas, Nihat
    Aziz, Saqib
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2023, 34 (04) : 2212 - 2233
  • [5] Does idiosyncratic risk matter? Evidence from mergers and acquisitions
    Nguyen, Pascal
    Ben Zaied, Younes
    Thu Phuong Pham
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RISK FINANCE, 2019, 20 (04) : 313 - 329
  • [6] DOES SUSTAINABILITY MATTER IN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS? THE CASE OF THE SERBIAN FOOD INDUSTRY
    Dencic-Mihajlov, Ksenija
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2020, 67 (01): : 25 - 36
  • [7] Does the origin matter? The effects of cross-border mergers and acquisitions in France
    Carril-Caccia, Federico
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGING MARKETS, 2021, 16 (08) : 2136 - 2154
  • [8] Does reputation risk matter? Evidence from cross -border mergers and acquisitions
    Maung, Min
    Wilson, Craig
    Yu, Weisu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2020, 66
  • [9] Does Voluntary Financial Disclosure Matter? The Case of Fairness Opinions in Mergers and Acquisitions
    Badawi, Adam B.
    Cain, Matthew D.
    Solomon, Steven Davidoff
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2023, 66 (03): : 535 - 555
  • [10] Cultural, trust, and transparency effects on the use of anchoring in mergers and acquisitions
    Ferris, Stephen P.
    Jayaraman, Narayanan
    Liao, Min-Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL RESEARCH, 2024, 47 (01) : 5 - 25