The Oncotype Dx Assay in ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients: A Real Life Experience from a Single Cancer Center

被引:11
|
作者
Thibodeau, Stephane [1 ]
Voutsadakis, Ioannis A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northern Ontario Sch Med, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[2] Northern Ontario Sch Med, Div Clin Sci, Sudbury, ON, Canada
[3] Sault Area Hosp, Algoma Dist Canc Program, Sault Ste Marie, ON, Canada
关键词
Oncotype Dx; breast cancer; recurrence risk; prediction; retrospective; RECURRENCE SCORE; 21-GENE ASSAY; DECISIONS; PATTERNS; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.5152/ejbh.2019.4901
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the influence of the Oncotype Dx assay on the treatment of patients with Estrogen Receptor (ER)-positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, axillary lymph node-negative or micrometastatic carcinoma of the breast in a single cancer center. In addition, patients with intermediate Oncotype Dx recurrence scores were analyzed to assess the factors influencing therapeutic decisions for adjuvant chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: Data from medical records of women diagnosed with carcinoma of the breast and qualified for the Oncotype Dx assay were extracted (OncoDx cohort). Patient demographic and cancer characteristics, genomic report, and course of treatment data, including survival outcomes and treatment decision-making, were analyzed. A matched cohort of patients with similar tumor stage and biology (ER-positive, HER2-negative) from the era before the introduction of the Oncotype Dx assay was analyzed for comparison (pre-OncoDx cohort). Results: Two hundred and one patients were included in the OncoDx cohort and one hundred and sixty patients were included in the pre-OncoDx cohort. Oncotype Dx recurrence score (RS) was low (<11) in fifty-six patients (28%), intermediate (11-25) in one hundred and twenty-three patients (61.5%) and high (>25) in twenty one patients (10.5%). Demographic and cancer clinicopathologic characteristics between OncoDx and pre-OncoDx cohorts were similar. Overall, 10.9% of the patients in the OncoDx cohort received adjuvant chemotherapy, versus 23.8% of the patients in the pre-OncoDx cohort (Fisher exact p=0.003). Fewer patients were recommended adjuvant chemotherapy in the OncoDx era compared to the pre-OncoDx era (17.9% vs 30.6%, respectively, Fisher exact p=0.006). The decision to recommend chemotherapy within the intermediate-risk cohort was influenced by the patient's RS. The mean RS of patients in the intermediate-risk cohort who did not receive chemotherapy was 21.5 while the score of those that received chemotherapy was 24.6 (p=0.000). The series confirmed excellent PFS and OS for both OncoDx and pre-OncoDx cohorts. Conclusion: This single cancer center analysis confirms the avoidance of chemotherapy in the great majority of patients with early ER-positive, HER2-negative, lymph node-negative or micrometastatic carcinoma of the breast since the introduction of the Oncotype Dx assay. A higher recurrence risk score within the intermediate group may influence the decision for chemotherapy inclusion in the adjuvant treatment plan. A lower PR percentage by IHC and higher grade may predict higher Oncotype Dx scores.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 170
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utilization of oncotype DX in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer patients
    Patel, H.
    Hook, K.
    Kaplan, C.
    Davidson, R.
    DeMichele, A.
    Fox, K. R.
    Domchek, S. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [2] Elacestrant for ER-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
    Hageman, Elizabeth
    Lussier, Mia E.
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 58 (08) : 849 - 856
  • [3] Elacestrant in advanced ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Kuenzell, Judith Lorenz
    [J]. GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2023, 83 (01) : 16 - 16
  • [4] Discordant classification and outcomes between Prosigna and Oncotype Dx Recurrence Score for ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer
    Sestak, Ivana
    Ferree, Sean
    Shemesh, Itay
    Buckingham, Wesley
    Cuzick, Jack
    Dowsett, Mitchell
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 80 (04)
  • [5] Challenges in the management of advanced, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Christopher D. Hart
    Ilenia Migliaccio
    Luca Malorni
    Cristina Guarducci
    Laura Biganzoli
    Angelo Di Leo
    [J]. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2015, 12 : 541 - 552
  • [6] Palbociclib and letrozole for ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer
    Abraham, Jame
    Mechcatie, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY AND SUPPORTIVE ONCOLOGY, 2015, 13 (03): : 83 - 86
  • [7] Challenges in the management of advanced, ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer
    Hart, Christopher D.
    Migliaccio, Ilenia
    Malorni, Luca
    Guarducci, Cristina
    Biganzoli, Laura
    Di Leo, Angelo
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 12 (09) : 541 - 552
  • [8] Targeting AKT in ER-Positive HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: From Molecular Promises to Real Life Pitfalls?
    Mery, Benoite
    Poulard, Coralie
    Le Romancer, Muriel
    Tredan, Olivier
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2021, 22 (24)
  • [9] Endocrine therapy for ER-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Reinert, Tomas
    de Paula, Bruno
    Shafaee, Maryam Nemati
    Souza, Pedro Henrique
    Ellis, Matthew J.
    Bines, Jose
    [J]. CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (03)
  • [10] Oncotype Dx assay in BRCA positive ER positive breast cancer patients
    Halpern, N.
    Sonnenblick, A.
    Kaduori, L.
    Uziely, B.
    Goldberg, Y.
    Katz, D.
    AlIweis, T.
    Divinsky, L.
    Merlet, I.
    Maly, B.
    Sagi, M.
    Hamburger, T.
    Carmon, E.
    Peretz, T.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73