A comparison of adverse reaction rates for PAS C versus plasma platelet units

被引:67
|
作者
Cohn, Claudia S. [1 ]
Stubbs, James [2 ]
Schwartz, Joseph [3 ]
Francis, Richard [3 ]
Goss, Cheryl [4 ]
Cushing, Melissa [4 ]
Shaz, Beth [5 ]
Mair, David [6 ]
Brantigan, Barbara [7 ]
Heaton, W. Andrew [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Sch Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Columbia Univ Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Cell Biol, New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med Ctr, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, New York, NY USA
[5] New York Blood Ctr, Med Programs & Serv, New York, NY 10021 USA
[6] Amer Red Cross North Cent Reg, St Paul, MN USA
[7] Fenwal, Lake Zurich, IL USA
[8] N Shore Univ Hosp, Transfus Serv, Manhasset, NY USA
[9] N Shore Univ Hosp, Donor Serv, Manhasset, NY USA
关键词
ALLERGIC TRANSFUSION REACTIONS; ADDITIVE SOLUTION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; M-SOL; STORAGE; DIPHENHYDRAMINE; ACETAMINOPHEN; PREMEDICATION; EFFICACY; RELEASE;
D O I
10.1111/trf.12597
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Plasma constituents have been implicated in some types of platelet (PLT) transfusion reactions. Leukoreduced apheresis PLTs stored in InterSol have 65% less plasma than apheresis PLTs stored in 100% plasma (PPs). This study compared transfusion reaction rates in InterSol PLTs (PLT additive solution [PAS] C) versus PPs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study design was an open-label, nonrandomized retrospective review. Statistical methods were applied to substantiate noninferiority and superiority of PAS C compared to PP in terms of transfusion reaction rates. Adverse reactions (ARs) were categorized using the Biovigilance Component of the National Healthcare Safety Network. Active surveillance was used to monitor all transfusions, both with ARs and without ARs. RESULTS: A total of 14,005 transfusions from six study sites were included, with 9845 PP transfusions given to 2202 patients and 4160 PAS C to 1444 patients. A total of 165 ARs were reported. Percentages of transfusions with ARs were 1.37% for PPs, 0.55% for PAS C, and 1.13% overall. The relative risk (RR) for PAS C versus PPs was calculated as 0.403 with an upper confidence limit (UCL) of 0.663. Overall, ARs with the highest incidence were allergic transfusion reactions (ATRs) and febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), at 0.66 and 0.40% of total transfusions reported, respectively. The relative risks (UCLs) for ATRs and FNHTRs, respectively, were 0.350 (0.686) and 0.336 (0.827). CONCLUSIONS: PAS C PLTs were statistically superior and noninferior to PPs with respect to the transfusion-related AR rate. PAS C noninferiority and superiority were also demonstrated for ATRs and FNHTRs, separately.
引用
收藏
页码:1927 / 1934
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparison of Adverse Reaction Rates for Platelet Additive Solution 3 (PAS 3) Versus Plasma Platelet Units
    Cohn, C. S.
    Stubbs, J. R.
    Schwartz, J.
    Cushing, M.
    Goss, C.
    Shaz, B. H.
    Mair, D. C.
    Heaton, W.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2013, 53 : 136A - 137A
  • [2] Anti-A and anti-B titers in group O platelet units are reduced in PAS C versus conventional plasma units
    Surowiecka, Maria
    Zantek, Nicole
    Morgan, Shanna
    Cohn, Claudia S.
    Dangerfield, Rebecca
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2014, 54 (01) : 255 - 256
  • [3] Isohemagglutinin Titers in Platelet Additive Solution 3 (PAS 3) Platelets Versus Conventional Plasma Platelet Units
    Surowiecka, M.
    Dangerfield, R.
    Welbig, J.
    Pulkrabek, S.
    Cohn, C. S.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2013, 53 : 81A - 81A
  • [4] Relationship between platelet activation and recovery of platelet concentrates stored in PAS versus plasma
    Pouwels, J
    de Wildt, J
    van Marwijk, M
    Kooy, MV
    van Prooyen, HC
    Akkerman, JW
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 1999, 39 (10) : 89S - 89S
  • [5] Transfusion Reaction Rates Are Reduced with Platelet Units Stored in Platelet Additive Solution
    Cohn, C. S.
    Welbig, J.
    Mair, D. C.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2011, 51 : 131A - 131A
  • [6] Comparison of platelet concentrates prepared and stored in PAS-II and plasma
    Tiekstra, MJ
    Van der Meer, PF
    Pietersz, RN
    Dekker, WJ
    Reesink, HW
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2000, 40 (10) : 25S - 25S
  • [7] Effect of storage of platelet concentrates in PAS-B, PAS-C, or plasma on transfusion reactions
    van Hout, Fabienne M. A.
    Middelburg, Rutger A.
    van der Meer, Pieter F.
    Pors, Aad
    Wiersum-Osselton, Johanna C.
    Schipperus, Martin R.
    Kerkhoffs, Jean-Louis
    van der Bom, Johanna G.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2019, 59 (10) : 3140 - 3145
  • [8] Possible reduced rate of adverse reactions to plasma reduced pooled platelet units
    Wagner, F. F.
    Adamo, W.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2006, 46 (09) : 89A - 89A
  • [9] In Vitro Comparison of Apheresis Platelet Concentrates Stored with 15% or 20% Plasma in Reformulated PAS
    Radwanski, K.
    Min, K.
    Mayaudon, V.
    Payrat, J.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2009, 49 : 89A - 89A
  • [10] More on the comparison of Plasma-Lyte A and PAS 2 as platelet additive solutions - Reply
    vanRhenen, DJ
    Vermeij, H
    KappersKlunne, M
    Payrat, JM
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 1996, 36 (11-12) : 1033 - 1034