Comparative Analysis of Different Evaluation Functions for Protein Structure Prediction Under the HP Model

被引:12
|
作者
Garza-Fabre, Mario [1 ]
Rodriguez-Tello, Eduardo [1 ]
Toscano-Pulido, Gregorio [1 ]
机构
[1] CINVESTAV Tamaulipas, Informat Technol Lab, Ciudad Victoria 87130, Tamaulipas, Mexico
关键词
evaluation function; protein structure prediction; metaheuristics; combinatorial optimization; bioinformatics; FOLDING PROBLEM; COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; LANDSCAPES; SEARCH; 2D;
D O I
10.1007/s11390-013-1384-7
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The HE model for protein structure prediction abstracts the fact that hydrophobicity is a dominant force in the protein folding process. This challenging combinatorial optimization problem has been widely addressed through metaheuristics. The evaluation function is a key component for the success of metaheuristics; the poor discrimination of the conventional evaluation function of the HP model has motivated the proposal of alternative formulations for this component. This comparative analysis inquires into the effectiveness of seven different evaluation functions for the HP model. The degree of discrimination provided, by each of the studied functions, their capability to preserve a rank ordering among potential solutions which is consistent with the original objective of the HP model, as well as their effect on the performance of local search methods are analyzed. The obtained results indicate that studying alternative evaluation schemes for the HP model represents a highly valuable direction which merits more attention.
引用
收藏
页码:868 / 889
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Analysis of Different Evaluation Functions for Protein Structure Prediction Under the HP Model
    Mario Garza-Fabre
    Eduardo Rodriguez-Tello
    Gregorio Toscano-Pulido
    [J]. Journal of Computer Science & Technology, 2013, 28 (05) : 868 - 889
  • [2] Comparative Analysis of Different Evaluation Functions for Protein Structure Prediction Under the HP Model
    Mario Garza-Fabre
    Eduardo Rodriguez-Tello
    Gregorio Toscano-Pulido
    [J]. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2013, 28 : 868 - 889
  • [3] Comparing Alternative Energy Functions for the HP Model of Protein Structure Prediction
    Garza-Fabre, Mario
    Rodriguez-Tello, Eduardo
    Toscano-Pulido, Gregorio
    [J]. 2011 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2011, : 2307 - 2314
  • [4] Extended HP Model for Protein Structure Prediction
    Hoque, Tamjidul
    Chetty, Madhu
    Sattar, Abdul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2009, 16 (01) : 85 - 103
  • [5] Study of fitness landscapes for the HP model of protein structure prediction
    Flores, SD
    Smith, J
    [J]. CEC: 2003 CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 2338 - 2345
  • [6] Protein structure prediction in the 3D HP model
    Kanj, Fatima
    Mansour, Nashat
    Khachfe, Hassan
    Abu-Khzam, Faisal
    [J]. 2009 IEEE/ACS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 732 - +
  • [7] Differential Evolution for Protein Structure Prediction Using the HP Model
    Santos, J.
    Dieguez, M.
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS ON NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL COMPUTATION: 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORK-CONFERENCE ON THE INTERPLAY BETWEEN NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL COMPUTATION, IWINAC 2011, PART I, 2011, 6686 : 323 - 333
  • [8] Applying deep reinforcement learning to the HP model for protein structure prediction
    Yang, Kaiyuan
    Huang, Houjing
    Vandans, Olafs
    Murali, Adithya
    Tian, Fujia
    Yap, Roland H. C.
    Dai, Liang
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2023, 609
  • [9] A local landscape mapping method for protein structure prediction in the HP model
    Citrolo, Andrea G.
    Mauri, Giancarlo
    [J]. NATURAL COMPUTING, 2014, 13 (03) : 309 - 319
  • [10] Handling Constraints in the HP Model for Protein Structure Prediction by Multiobjective Optimization
    Garza-Fabre, Mario
    Toscano-Pulido, Gregorio
    Rodriguez-Tello, Eduardo
    [J]. 2013 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2013, : 2728 - 2735