Multi-Criteria Decision-Making under mHF ELECTRE-I and HmF ELECTRE-I

被引:20
|
作者
Adeel, Arooj [1 ]
Akram, Muhammad [1 ]
Koam, Ali N. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Punjab, Dept Math, New Campus, Lahore 54590, Pakistan
[2] Jazan Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Math, New Campus,POB 2097, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
关键词
HFSs; mF sets; mHF-sets; HmF-sets; MCGDM; mHF ELECTRE-I; HmF ELECTRE-I; HESITANT FUZZY-SETS; AGGREGATION OPERATORS; PREFERENCE RELATIONS; EXTENSION; SELECTION; RANKING; QUALITY; CHOICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/en12091661
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In a few years, hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) have had an impact on several different areas of decision science. However, a number of researches have utilized the Elimination and choice translating reality (ELECTRE) methods to determine the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems with hesitant information. The aim of this research article is to develop new multi-criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) methods, such as the m-polar hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE-I (mHF ELECTRE-I) method and hesitant m-polar fuzzy ELECTRE-I (HmF ELECTRE-I) method. Proposed MCGDM techniques based on the hybrid models, m-polar hesitant fuzzy sets (mHFS-sets) and hesitant m-polar fuzzy sets (HmF-sets), which are the natural generalizations of HFSs and m-polar fuzzy sets (mF sets). These models enable us to deal with multipolar information under hesitancy. We use the proposed methods to deal the complex problems in which the membership degree of an element of given set uses the m different numeric and fuzzy values, to rank all the alternatives and to determine the best alternative. We present two practical examples that illustrate the procedure of the proposed methods. We also discuss the differences and comparative analysis of the proposed methods. Finally, we develop an algorithm that implements our decision-making procedures by using computer programming.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision-Making with Bipolar Neutrosophic TOPSIS and Bipolar Neutrosophic ELECTRE-I
    Akram, Muhammad
    Shumaiza
    Smarandache, Florentin
    AXIOMS, 2018, 7 (02):
  • [2] Novel mPolar Fuzzy Linguistic ELECTRE-I Method for Group Decision-Making
    Adeel, Arooj
    Akram, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Imran
    Nazar, Kashif
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2019, 11 (04):
  • [3] Novel Approach in Decision Making with m–Polar Fuzzy ELECTRE-I
    Muhammad Akram
    Neha Waseem
    Peide Liu
    International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 2019, 21 : 1117 - 1129
  • [4] Extensions of ELECTRE-I and TOPSIS methods for group decision-making under complex Pythagorean fuzzy environment
    Akram, M.
    Garg, H.
    Zahid, K.
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 17 (05): : 147 - 164
  • [5] Novel Approach in Decision Making with m-Polar Fuzzy ELECTRE-I
    Akram, Muhammad
    Waseem, Neha
    Liu, Peide
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 21 (04) : 1117 - 1129
  • [6] Decision-making analysis based on hesitant fuzzy N-soft ELECTRE-I approach
    Arooj Adeel
    Muhammad Akram
    Naim Çaǧman
    Soft Computing, 2022, 26 : 11849 - 11863
  • [7] Decision-making analysis based on hesitant fuzzy N-soft ELECTRE-I approach
    Adeel, Arooj
    Akram, Muhammad
    Cagman, Naim
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 26 (21) : 11849 - 11863
  • [8] The ELECTRE I Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Sets
    Chen, Na
    Xu, Zeshui
    Xia, Meimei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (03) : 621 - 657
  • [9] Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis
    Muhammad Akram
    Maham Shumaiza
    Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2020, 39
  • [10] 生产订单综合评估的改进ELECTRE-I算法
    陈志祥
    成组技术与生产现代化, 2005, (02) : 19 - 21