STN Versus GPi Deep Brain Stimulation for Action and Rest Tremor in Parkinson's Disease

被引:23
|
作者
Wong, Joshua K. [1 ]
Viswanathan, Vyas T. [1 ]
Nozile-Firth, Kamilia S. [1 ]
Eisinger, Robert S. [1 ]
Leone, Emma L. [1 ]
Desai, Anuj M. [1 ]
Foote, Kelly D. [2 ]
Ramirez-Zamora, Adolfo [1 ]
Okun, Michael S. [1 ]
Shukla, Aparna Wagle [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Normal Fixel Inst Neurol Dis, Dept Neurol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Normal Fixel Inst Neurol Dis, Dept Neurosurg, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
关键词
deep brain stimulation; tremor; parkinson disease; STN; GPi; SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS; ZONA INCERTA; REMATCH; TARGET; MOTOR;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2020.578615
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the effects of subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi), deep brain stimulation (DBS) on individual action tremor/postural tremor (AT) and rest tremor (RT) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Randomized DBS studies have reported marked benefit in tremor with both GPi and STN and DBS, however, there is a paucity of information available on AT vs RT when separated by the surgical target. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the 1-year clinical outcome of PD patients treated with STN and GPi DBS at the University of Florida. We specifically selected patients with moderate to severe AT. Eighty-eight patients (57 STN and 31 GPi) were evaluated at 6 and 12 months for changes in AT and RT in the OFF-medication/ON stimulation state. A comparison of "response" was performed and defined as greater than or equal to a 2-point decrease in tremor score. Results: STN and GPi DBS both improved AT at 6-and 12-months post-implantation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). The STN DBS group experienced a greater improvement in AT at 6 months compared to the GPi group (p = 0.005) but not at the 12 months follow-up (p = 0.301). Both STN and GPi DBS also improved RT at 6-and 12-months post-implantation (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). There was no difference in RT scores between the two groups at 6 months (p = 0.23) or 12 months (p = 0.74). The STN group had a larger proportion of patients who achieved a "response" in AT at 6 months (p < 0.01), however, this finding was not present at 12 months (p = 0.23). A subanalysis revealed that in RT, the STN group had a larger percentage of "responders" when followed through 12 months (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Both STN and GPi DBS reduced PD associated AT and RT at 12 months follow-up. There was no advantage of either brain target in the management of RT or AT. One nuance of the study was that STN DBS was more effective in suppressing AT in the early postoperative period, however, this effect diminished over time. Clinicians should be aware that it may take longer to achieve a similar tremor outcome when utilizing the GPi target.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neuropsychological outcome of GPi pallidotomy and GPi or STN deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease
    Trépanier, LL
    Kumar, R
    Lozano, AM
    Lang, AE
    Saint-Cyr, JA
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2000, 42 (03) : 324 - 347
  • [2] GPi and STN deep brain stimulation can suppress dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease
    Oyama, Genko
    Foote, Kelly D.
    Jacobson, Charles E.
    Velez-Lago, Frances
    Go, Criscely
    Limotai, Natlada
    Zeilman, Pamela R.
    Romrell, Janet
    Wu, Samuel S.
    Neal, Dan
    Okun, Michael S.
    [J]. PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2012, 18 (07) : 814 - 818
  • [3] Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease - A critical re-evaluation of STN versus GPi DBS
    Vitek, JL
    [J]. STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 78 (3-4) : 119 - 131
  • [4] GPi and STN Deep Brain Stimulation Can Suppress and Induce Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease
    Oyama, Genko
    Foote, Kelly D.
    Jacobson, Charles E.
    Velez-Lago, Frances
    Go, Criscely
    Limotai, Natlada
    Zeilman, Pam
    Okun, Michael S.
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2011, 76 (09) : A541 - A541
  • [5] STN vs. GPi deep brain stimulation for tremor suppression in Parkinson disease: A systematic review and meta -analysis
    Wong, Joshua K.
    Cauraugh, James H.
    Ho, Kwo Wei David
    Broderick, Matthew
    Ramirez-Zamora, Adolfo
    Almeida, Leonardo
    Shukla, Aparna Wagle
    Wilson, Christina A.
    de Bie, Rob M. A.
    Weaver, Frances M.
    Kang, Nyeonju
    Okun, Michael S.
    [J]. PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2019, 58 : 56 - 62
  • [6] STN vs. GPi deep brain stimulation for tremor suppression in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wong, Joshua
    Cauraugh, James
    Ho, Kwo Wei David
    Broderick, Matthew
    Zamora, Adolfo Ramirez
    Almeida, Leonardo
    Wagle-Shukla, Aparna
    Wilson, Christina
    De Bie, Robertus
    Weaver, Frances
    Okun, Michael
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2018, 90
  • [7] Differential STN and GPi deep brain stimulation effects on oculomotor function in patients with Parkinson's disease
    Lai, E. C.
    Fridley, J.
    Adams, G.
    Sun, P.
    York, M. K.
    Atassi, F.
    Viswanathan, A.
    Simpson, R. K.
    Yoshor, D.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2012, 27 : S163 - S163
  • [8] Cognitive effects of GPi versus STN Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's disease: experience with patients with moderate cognitive impairment
    Marques-Matos, C.
    Sousa, C.
    Lima, J.
    Monteiro, P.
    Linhares, P.
    Vaz, R.
    Rosas, M. J.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2017, 32
  • [9] Evaluation of outcome following revision of STN deep brain stimulation to GPi for an individual with Parkinson's disease
    Forrow, B.
    Joint, C.
    Bogdanovic, M.
    Cheeran, B.
    Fitzgerald, J.
    Green, A. L.
    Aziz, T. Z.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2014, 29 : S440 - S440
  • [10] A systematic review to compare the effect of bilateral deep brain stimulation (STN versus GPI) on gait and balance in Parkinson's disease
    Dash, D.
    Vibha, D.
    Mestre, T.
    [J]. MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2022, 37 : S444 - S445