DAVOS 1929: "WHAT IS MAN?" THE DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN CASSIRER AND HEIDEGGER. PHILOSOPHICAL AND POLITICAL REASONS

被引:0
|
作者
Quesada, Julio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Veracruzana, Inst Filosofia, Veracruz, Mexico
来源
关键词
Kant; Husserl; universality; freedom; language; republican constitution; infinity; plurality; Cassirer; Heidegger;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
My essay wanted to explain genealogically and in a contextualized way the disagreement between Cassirer and Heidegger in Davos, and its drift towards Nazism from the budgets of their existential philosophy. What role does spiritual anti-Semitism play in the Heideggerian critique of neo-Kantianism and transcendental phenomenology? Why is Husserl's phenomenology "a monstrosity"? Why does Kant become the battle and battlefield of the Kulturkampf? Why do you read Heidegger as you read? What is the meaning of the practice of the history of philosophy in the "final" of philosophy?
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 218
页数:42
相关论文
共 10 条