Development and Validation of a Novel Motor-Cognitive Assessment Strategy of Compensatory Sit-to-Stand Maneuvers in People With Dementia

被引:5
|
作者
Werner, Christian [1 ]
Wiloth, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Lemke, Nele Christin [1 ,3 ]
Kronbach, Florian [4 ]
Hauer, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, AGAPLESION Bethanien Hosp, Geriatr Ctr, Rohrbacher Str 149, D-69126 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Study Christian Social Serv, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, Network Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Med Ctr Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
assessment; dementia; movement strategy; rehabilitation; sit-to-stand; LOWER-EXTREMITY FUNCTION; CHAIR RISE STRATEGIES; BODY FIXED SENSOR; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; OLDER-ADULTS; PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT; FALLS; STRENGTH; AGE;
D O I
10.1519/JPT.0000000000000116
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: People with dementia show disease-specific sit-to-stand (STS) movement disorders, which relate to deficits of integrating cognitive aspects of motor processes into motor action organization. During STS training in rehabilitation therapy, compensatory STS movement maneuvers are taught aiming to improve patients' STS ability. Previous clinical STS measures do not address these maneuvers or assess cognitive aspects of their motor action organization. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a motor-cognitive STS assessment instrument for people with dementia (Assessment of Compensatory Sit-to-Stand Maneuvers in People With Dementia, ACSID). Methods: The ACSID covers the recall, initiation, and effective performance of compensatory STS movement maneuvers. The inter- and intrarater reliability, concurrent validity, sensitivity to change, and feasibility were investigated by secondary analysis of data of 97 participants from a randomized controlled trial to improve motor-cognitive performances in people with mild to moderate dementia (mean [standard deviation] age: 82.5 [5.9] years, Mini-Mental Status Examination: 21.9 [2.9] points). Concurrent validity of the individual ACSID items was assessed against reference criteria derived from video-motion analysis. Results: Good to excellent inter- (kappa [] = 0.64-0.99; intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.74-0.89) and intrarater (= 0.77-0.91; ICC = 0.77-0.91), concurrent validity (point-biserial correlation coefficients = |0.56|-|0.84|), and sensitivity to change (standardized response means = 0.61-1.00) were found. Feasibility was excellent with a high completion rate (96.9%), no critical events during assessment, and no floor or ceiling effects. Conclusions: The ACSID represents the first observation-based assessment instrument to document motor and cognitive aspects in the execution of a motor key feature in people with dementia, and has been shown to be reliable, valid, feasible, and sensitive to intervention-induced changes.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:12
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] People with Dementia Can Learn Compensatory Movement Maneuvers for the Sit-to-Stand Task: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Werner, Christian
    Wiloth, Stefanie
    Lemke, Nele Christin
    Kronbach, Florian
    Jansen, Carl-Philipp
    Oster, Peter
    Bauer, Juergen M.
    Hauer, Klaus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2017, 60 (01) : 107 - 120
  • [2] Validation of a motor-cognitive Assessment Process to assess compensatory Movements while Sitting-Standing-Transfer of People with Dementia
    Werner, C.
    Lemke, N. C.
    Wiloth, S.
    Kronbach, F.
    Hauer, K.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2016, 49 : S58 - S58
  • [3] Validation of a Computerized, Game-based Assessment Strategy to Measure Training Effects on Motor-Cognitive Functions in People With Dementia
    Wiloth, Stefanie
    Lemke, Nele
    Werner, Christian
    Hauer, Klaus
    [J]. JMIR SERIOUS GAMES, 2016, 4 (02):
  • [4] Validation of a computerized, play-based Assessment Method for Detecting motor-cognitive Performance of People with Dementia
    Wiloth, S.
    Lemke, N. C.
    Werner, C.
    Hauer, K.
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2016, 49 : S59 - S59