The Role of Education in the Implementation of Shared Decision Making in Emergency Medicine: A Research Agenda

被引:12
|
作者
Chen, Esther H. [1 ]
Kanzaria, Hemal K. [1 ]
Itakura, Kaoru [2 ]
Booker-Vaughns, Juanita [3 ]
Yadav, Kabir [2 ]
Kane, Bryan G. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Emergency Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, LA Biomed Res Inst, Community Council, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Lehigh Valley Hlth Network, Dept Emergency Med, Allentown, PA USA
关键词
MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION-SKILLS; INTERPERSONAL SKILLS; RISK COMMUNICATION; CORE COMPETENCES; CHEST-PAIN; STUDENTS; AID; CURRICULUM; PHYSICIANS;
D O I
10.1111/acem.13059
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Shared decision making (SDM) is a patient-centered communication skill that is essential for all physicians to provide quality care. Like any competency or procedural skill, it can and should be introduced to medical students during their clerkships (undergraduate medical education), taught and assessed during residency training (graduate medical education), and have documentation of maintenance throughout an emergency physician's career (denoted as continuing medical education). A subgroup representing academic emergency medicine (EM) faculty, residents, content experts, and patients convened at the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference on SDM to develop a research agenda toward improving implementation of SDM through sustainable education efforts. After developing a list of potential priorities, the subgroup presented the priorities in turn to the consensus group, to the EM program directors (CORD-EM), and finally at the conference itself. The two highest-priority questions were related to determining or developing EM-applicable available tools and on-shift interventions for SDM and working to determine the proportion of the broader SDM curriculum that should be taught and assessed at each level of training. Educating patients and the community about SDM was also raised as an important concept for consideration. The remaining research priorities were divided into high-, moderate-, and lower-priority groups. Moreover, there was consensus that the overall approach to SDM should be consistent with the high-quality educational design utilized for other pertinent topics in EM. (C) 2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:1362 / 1367
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health Policy and Shared Decision Making in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda
    Maughan, Brandon C.
    Meisel, Zachary F.
    Venkatesh, Arjun K.
    Lin, Michelle P.
    Perry, Warren M., II
    Schuur, Jeremiah D.
    Pines, Jesse M.
    Kizzie-Gillett, Constance L.
    Vaughan, William
    Grudzen, Corita R.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (12) : 1380 - 1385
  • [2] Dissemination and Implementation of Shared Decision Making Into Clinical Practice: A Research Agenda
    Kanzaria, Hemal K.
    Booker-Vaughns, Juanita
    Itakura, Kaoru
    Yadav, Kabir
    Kane, Bryan G.
    Gayer, Christopher
    Lin, Grace
    LeBlanc, Annie
    Gibson, Robert
    Chen, Esther H.
    Williams, Pluscedia
    Carpenter, Christopher R.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (12) : 1368 - 1379
  • [3] Shared Decision Making to Improve the Emergency Care of Older Adults: A Research Agenda
    Hogan, Teresita M.
    Richmond, Natalie L.
    Carpenter, Christopher R.
    Biese, Kevin
    Hwang, Ula
    Shah, Manish N.
    Escobedo, Marcus
    Berman, Amy
    Broder, Joshua S.
    Platts-Mills, Timothy F.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (12) : 1386 - 1393
  • [4] Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda
    Melnick, Edward R.
    Probst, Marc A.
    Schoenfeld, Elizabeth
    Collins, Sean P.
    Breslin, Maggie
    Walsh, Cheryl
    Kuppermann, Nathan
    Dunn, Pat
    Abella, Benjamin S.
    Boatright, Dowin
    Hess, Erik P.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (12) : 1346 - 1353
  • [5] Trust and shared decision-making: an emerging research agenda
    Entwistle, V
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2004, 7 (04) : 271 - 273
  • [6] The role of shared decision making in diabetes education
    Yeh, Mei Chang
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2016, 120 : S35 - S35
  • [7] An Agenda for Increasing Grant Funding of Emergency Medicine Education Research
    Choo, Esther K.
    Fernandez, Rosemarie
    Hayden, Emily M.
    Schneider, Jeffrey I.
    Clyne, Brian
    Ginsburg, Shiphra
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (12) : 1434 - 1441
  • [8] An agenda for clinical decision making and judgement in nursing research and education
    Thompson, Carl
    Aitken, Leanne
    Doran, Diane
    Dowding, Dawn
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2013, 50 (12) : 1720 - 1726
  • [9] Funding Research in Emergency Department Shared Decision Making: A Summary of the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference Panel Discussion
    Dodd, Kenneth W.
    Berman, Amy
    Brown, Jeremy
    Carr, Brendan G.
    Dunn, Patrick
    Escobedo, Marcus
    Gayer, Christopher
    Grieser, Mira
    Carpenter, Christopher R.
    Hess, Erik P.
    Grudzen, Corita R.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 23 (12) : 1340 - 1345
  • [10] Shared decision making in perioperative medicine
    Timbrell, David
    Santhirapala, Ramai
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 2020, 81 (04) : 1 - 2