Occurrence, distribution, and sources of antimicrobials in a mixed-use watershed

被引:25
|
作者
Couperus, Nathanael P. [1 ]
Pagsuyoin, Sheree A. [2 ]
Bragg, Leslie M. [3 ]
Servos, Mark R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, Lowell, MA 01854 USA
[3] Univ Waterloo, Dept Biol, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Antimicrobials; Livestock farms; Effluent discharge; Wastewater treatment; Watershed; Surface water; PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT BACTERIA; WASTE-WATER; TREATMENT PLANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; SURFACE WATERS; SWINE MANURE; PHARMACEUTICALS; FATE; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.086
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The release into the environment of antimicrobial compounds from both human and agricultural sources is a growing global concern. The Grand River watershed, the largest mixed-use watershed in southern Ontario, receives runoff from intensive animal production as well as municipal wastewater effluents from a rapidly increasing human population. A survey of surface waters and wastewater effluents was conducted across the watershed to assess the occurrence and distribution of several antimicrobials (i.e., trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, sulfamethazine, lincomycin, and monensin) and chemical indicators (i.e., ammonia, nitrate, ibuprofen, venlafaxine, atrazine) and to characterize exposure levels. The human antimicrobials trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole were detected in the urban areas of the main channel at mean concentrations of 8 +/- 7 ng/L and 31 +/- 24 ng/L, respectively, but at much lower concentrations in the agricultural tributaries. In contrast, the veterinary antimicrobial sulfamethazine was detected at a mean concentration of 11 +/- 9 ng/L in the main channel, and at a much higher concentration in the agricultural tributaries. Lincomycin was detected in only two river samples and not in the effluents while monensin was not detected in all samples. The herbicide atrazine was detected at very low concentrations in the surface waters of both the tributaries and the main channel. The concentrations of the antimicrobials and chemical indicators generally increased downstream of the confluences with agricultural tributaries and effluent outfalls. In the wastewater effluents, the concentrations of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, ibuprofen, and venlafaxine decreased with increasing treatment levels (i.e., secondary to tertiary) as indicated by ammonia/nitrate concentrations. There was a strong correlation among trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, and venlafaxine in the main channel and in the wastewater effluents. While the environmental concentrations of antimicrobials in the watershed are low relative to toxicity thresholds, their persistence in the environment may be an important consideration in defining strategies for future water management. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1581 / 1591
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contribution of nitrogen sources to streams in mixed-use watershed varies seasonally in a temperate region
    Lin, Zuhong
    Liu, Junchi
    Xiao, Yong
    Yu, Chaojie
    Zhang, Jinlan
    Zhang, Tingting
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (14) : 20357 - 20369
  • [2] Contribution of nitrogen sources to streams in mixed-use watershed varies seasonally in a temperate region
    Zuhong Lin
    Junchi Liu
    Yong Xiao
    Chaojie Yu
    Jinlan Zhang
    Tingting Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 20357 - 20369
  • [3] Stream water nutrient enrichment in a mixed-use watershed
    King, K. W.
    Balogh, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2011, 13 (03): : 721 - 731
  • [4] Antibiotic Resistance Analysis of Fecal Coliforms to Determine Fecal Pollution Sources in a Mixed-Use Watershed
    Brian S. Burnes
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2003, 85 : 87 - 98
  • [5] Capturing microbial sources distributed in a mixed-use watershed within an integrated environmental modeling workflow
    Whelan, Gene
    Kim, Keewook
    Parmar, Rajbir
    Laniak, Gerard F.
    Wolfe, Kurt
    Galvin, Michael
    Molina, Marirosa
    Pachepsky, Yakov A.
    Duda, Paul
    Zepp, Richard
    Prieto, Lourdes
    Kinzelman, Julie L.
    Kleinheinz, Gregory T.
    Borchardt, Mark A.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 99 : 126 - 146
  • [6] Antibiotic resistance analysis of fecal coliforms to determine fecal pollution sources in a mixed-use watershed
    Burnes, BS
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2003, 85 (01) : 87 - 98
  • [7] Contaminants of Emerging Concern: Mass Balance and Comparison of Wastewater Effluent and Upstream Sources in a Mixed-Use Watershed
    Fairbairn, David J.
    Arnold, William A.
    Barber, Brian L.
    Kaufenberg, Elizabeth F.
    Koskinen, William C.
    Novak, Paige J.
    Rice, Pamela J.
    Swackhamer, Deborah L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (01) : 36 - 45
  • [8] Evaluating the Occurrence of Host-Specific Bacteroidales, General Fecal Indicators, and Bacterial Pathogens in a Mixed-Use Watershed
    Drozd, Mary
    Merrick, Natsuko N.
    Sanad, Yasser M.
    Dick, Linda K.
    Dick, Warren A.
    Rajashekara, Gireesh
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2013, 42 (03) : 713 - 725
  • [9] Exploring co-occurrence patterns between organic micropollutants and bacterial community structure in a mixed-use watershed
    Gao, Han
    LaVergne, JeanneM.
    Carpenter, Corey M. G.
    Desai, Raj
    Zhang, Xu
    Gray, Kimberly
    Helbling, Damian E.
    Wells, George F.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2019, 21 (05) : 867 - 880
  • [10] Escherichia coli loading at or near base flow in a mixed-use watershed
    Gentry, Randall W.
    McCarthy, John
    Layton, Alice
    McKay, Larry D.
    Williams, Dan
    Koirala, Shesh R.
    Sayler, Gary S.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2006, 35 (06) : 2244 - 2249