A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian transport and non-linear reaction algorithms

被引:62
|
作者
Benson, David A. [1 ]
Aquino, Tomas [2 ]
Bolster, Diogo [2 ]
Engdahl, Nicholas [3 ]
Henri, Christopher V. [4 ]
Fernandez-Garcia, Daniel [4 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Hydrol Sci & Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Univ Notre Dame, Civil & Environm Engn, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[3] Washington State Univ, Civil & Environm Engn, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[4] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Geotech Engn & Geosci, Barcelona, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Particle tracking; Chemical reaction; Numerical dispersion; Nonlinear amplification; DISCONTINUOUS GALERKIN METHOD; POROUS-MEDIA; PARTICLE TRACKING; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; GROUNDWATER; ADVECTION; FLUX; SIMULATIONS; FLOW; BIODEGRADATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.11.003
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
When laboratory-measured chemical reaction rates are used in simulations at the field-scale, the models typically overpredict the apparent reaction rates. The discrepancy is primarily due to poorer mixing of chemically distinct waters at the larger scale. As a result, realistic field-scale predictions require accurate simulation of the degree of mixing between fluids. The Lagrangian particle-tracking (PT) method is a now-standard way to simulate the transport of conservative or sorbing solutes. The method's main advantage is the absence of numerical dispersion (and its artificial mixing) when simulating advection. New algorithms allow particles of different species to interact in nonlinear (e.g., bimolecular) reactions. Therefore, the PT methods hold a promise of more accurate field-scale simulation of reactive transport because they eliminate the masking effects of spurious mixing due to advection errors inherent in grid-based methods. A hypothetical field-scale reaction scenario is constructed and run in PT and Eulerian (finitevolume/ finite-difference) simulators. Grid-based advection schemes considered here include 1st-to 3rd-order spatially accurate total-variation-diminishing flux-limiting schemes, both of which are widely used in current transport/reaction codes. A homogeneous velocity field in which the Courant number is everywhere unity, so that the chosen Eulerian methods incur no error when simulating advection, shows that both the Eulerian and PT methods can achieve convergence in the L-1 (integrated concentration) norm, but neither shows stricter pointwise convergence. In this specific case with a constant dispersion coefficient and bimolecular reaction A + B -> P, the correct total amount of product is 0.221 M-A0, where M-A0 is the original mass of reactant A. When the Courant number drops, the grid-based simulations can show remarkable errors due to spurious over-and under-mixing. In a heterogeneous velocity field (keeping the same constant and isotropic dispersion), the PT simulations show an increased reaction total from 0.221 M-A0 to 0.372 M-A0 due to fluid deformation, while the 1st-order Eulerian simulations using approximate to 10(6) cells (with a classical grid Peclet number Delta x/alpha L of 10) have total product of 0.53 M-A0, or approximately twice as much additional reaction due to advection error. The 3rd-order TVD algorithm fares better, with total product of 0.394 M-A0, or about 1.14 times the increased reaction total. A very strict requirement on grid Peclet numbers for Eulerian simulations will be required for realistic reactions because of their nonlinear nature. We analytically estimate the magnitude of the effect for the end-member cases of very fast and very slow reactions and show that in either case, the mass produced is proportional to 1/root Pe, where Pe is the Peclet number. Therefore, extra mass is produced according to root D, where the dispersion includes any numerical dispersion error. We test two PT methods, one that kills particles upon reaction and another that decrements a particle's mass. For the bimolecular reaction studied here, the computational demands of the particle-killing methods are much smaller than, and the particle-number-preserving algorithm are on par with, the fastest Eulerian methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 37
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian method for non-linear problems of geomechanics
    Nazem, M.
    Carter, J. P.
    Airey, D. W.
    9TH WORLD CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS AND 4TH ASIAN PACIFIC CONGRESS ON COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2010, 10
  • [2] ALGORITHMS FOR NON-LINEAR CONSTRAINTS THAT USE LAGRANGIAN FUNCTIONS
    POWELL, MJD
    MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING, 1978, 14 (02) : 224 - 248
  • [3] GENERALIZED LAGRANGIAN EQUATIONS OF NON-LINEAR REACTION-DIFFUSION
    BIOT, MA
    CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1982, 66 (1-2) : 11 - 26
  • [4] A comparison of Lagrangian and Eulerian formulations for reactive transport modelling
    Batlle, F
    Carrera, J
    Ayora, C
    COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN WATER RESOURCES, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 47 : 571 - 578
  • [5] Theoretical and numerical comparison of hyperelastic and hypoelastic formulations for Eulerian non-linear elastoplasticity
    Peshkov, Ilya
    Boscheri, Walter
    Loubere, Raphael
    Romenski, Evgeniy
    Dumbser, Michael
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2019, 387 : 481 - 521
  • [6] NON-LINEAR LAGRANGIAN OF CHIRAL TYPE
    FUKUDA, R
    PROGRESS OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 1970, 43 (01): : 206 - &
  • [7] A first-order hyperbolic arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian conservation formulation for non-linear solid dynamics
    Di Giusto, Thomas B. J.
    Lee, Chun Hean
    Gil, Antonio J.
    Bonet, Javier
    Giacomini, Matteo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 125 (15)
  • [8] Comparison of nonlocal Eulerian to Lagrangian moments for transport in an anisotropic heterogeneous aquifer with deterministic linear nonequilibrium sorption
    Hu, BX
    Cushman, JH
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1997, 33 (04) : 891 - 896
  • [10] Performance Comparison of Adaptive Algorithms for Non-Linear Channel Equalizer
    Singh, Akhand Pratap
    Chandra, Mahesh
    Kar, Asutosh
    2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS, SIGNALS, COMMUNICATION AND OPTIMIZATION (EESCO), 2015,