INCIDENCE OF STEROID-INDUCED OCULAR HYPERTENSION AFTER VITREORETINAL SURGERY WITH DIFLUPREDNATE VERSUS PREDNISOLONE ACETATE

被引:11
|
作者
Jeng, Karen W. [1 ]
Fine, Howard F. [1 ,2 ]
Wheatley, H. Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Roth, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Connors, Daniel B. [3 ]
Prenner, Jonathan L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Piscataway, NJ USA
[2] NJ Retina, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[3] Emory Eye Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0; 05%; ocular hypertension; prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1%; vitreoretinal surgery; OPHTHALMIC EMULSION 0.05-PERCENT; INFLAMMATION;
D O I
10.1097/IAE.0000000000000215
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:To identify changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) after vitreoretinal surgical procedures in eyes that received either difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (DP) or prednisolone acetate ophthalmic suspension 1% (PA).Methods:A retrospective chart review compared a consecutive series of 100 patients who received DP with 100 patients who received PA after vitreoretinal surgery. Data were collected for a 3-month period from the time of surgery.Results:A significantly higher number of patients treated with DP (35%, n = 35) developed increased IOP (>21 mmHg with a change from baseline of >10 mmHg) compared with those receiving PA (22%, n = 22) (P = 0.042). The mean maximum IOP in the DP cohort (26.7 mmHg) was significantly higher than that in the PA cohort (22.8 mmHg) (P = 0.0027). Additionally, the rise in IOP from baseline was significantly higher in the DP-treated cohort (9.0 mmHg) than that in the PA-treated cohort (6.0 mmHg) (P = 0.027).Conclusion:Eyes treated with DP after vitreoretinal surgery were at increased risk for developing clinically significant increases in IOP compared with those receiving PA.
引用
收藏
页码:1990 / 1996
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of prednisolone acetate 1.0% and difluprednate ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% after cataract surgery: Incidence of postoperative steroid-induced ocular hypertension
    Tijunelis, Marius A.
    Person, Erica
    Niziol, Leslie M.
    Musch, David C.
    Ernest, Paul
    McBain, Madeline
    Mian, Shahzad I.
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (02): : 223 - 227
  • [2] Higher incidence of steroid-induced ocular hypertension in keratoconus
    Anastasios John Kanellopoulos
    Emerson M. Cruz
    Robert Edward T. Ang
    George Asimellis
    Eye and Vision, 3
  • [3] Higher incidence of steroid-induced ocular hypertension in keratoconus
    Kanellopoulos, Anastasios John
    Cruz, Emerson M.
    Ang, Robert Edward T.
    Asimellis, George
    EYE AND VISION, 2016, 3
  • [4] Steroid-induced ocular hypertension after photorefractive keratectomy
    De Bernardo, Maddalena
    Salzano, Francesco Antonio
    Rosa, Nicola
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 44 (01): : 118 - 118
  • [5] Long-Term Risk of Steroid-Induced Ocular Hypertension/Glaucoma With Topical Prednisolone Acetate 1% After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty
    Price, Marianne O.
    Price, David A.
    Price Jr, Francis W.
    CORNEA, 2024, 43 (03) : 323 - 326
  • [6] Difluprednate versus Prednisolone Acetate after Cataract Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    KhalafAllah, Mahmoud Tawfik
    Basiony, Ahmed
    Salama, Ahmed
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [7] Steroid-Induced Ocular Hypertension in Normal Sheep
    Gerometta, Rosana
    Podos, Steven M.
    Danias, John
    Candia, Oscar A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (02) : 669 - 673
  • [8] STEROID-INDUCED OCULAR HYPERTENSION IN HIGH MYOPIA
    Wang Rong-fang
    Guo Bing-kuan
    CHINESEMEDICALJOURNAL, 1984, (01) : 28 - 28
  • [9] Predictive features of the steroid-induced ocular hypertension
    Min, Kyung Hyun
    Hyeob, Kim Jun
    Yeon, Gil Jin
    Lee, Kyung Eun
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 180 : 318 - 319
  • [10] Steroid-induced ocular hypertension in normal cattle
    Gerometta, R
    Podos, SM
    Candia, OA
    Wu, B
    Malgor, LA
    Mittag, T
    Danias, J
    ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 122 (10) : 1492 - 1497