Coupled Aeropropulsive Optimization of a Three-Dimensional Boundary-Layer Ingestion Propulsor Considering Inlet Distortion

被引:25
|
作者
Gray, Justin S. [1 ]
Mader, Charles A. [2 ]
Kenway, Gaetan K. W. [3 ]
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, John H Glenn Res Ctr, PSA Branch, 21000 Brookpk Rd,MS 5-11, Cleveland, OH 44135 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, 1320 Beal Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Sci & Technol Corp, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2020年 / 57卷 / 06期
关键词
MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN; DISTRIBUTED PROPULSION;
D O I
10.2514/1.C035845
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Boundary-layer ingestion (BLI) promises increased aircraft efficiency, but excessive inlet distortion must be avoided to prevent fans that are too heavy or structurally infeasible. We propose a new approach to study the effect of distortion on BLI propulsors via an aeropropulsive design optimization with a constraint on inlet distortion using highly efficient gradient-based methods with analytic derivatives. The fully coupled aeropropulsive model includes a three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes aerodynamic analysis of the flow and a thermodynamic cycle model of the propulsor fan. We minimize the shaft power required at cruise for the aft BLI thruster by varying the propulsor size and the shape of the propulsor nacelle and aft fuselage. Optimizations are performed with and without the inlet distortion constraint for different aft-propulsor sizes to study the impact of the constraint on overall BLI performance. The results show that imposing a distortion constraint increased the required propulsor shaft power by up to 1.2% relative to the unconstrained case, and that smaller propulsors suffer lower performance degradation than larger ones. The results underline the importance of using a fully coupled aeropropulsive model to predict BLI performance and demonstrate the power of aeropropulsive optimization in the design of BLI configurations.
引用
收藏
页码:1014 / 1025
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coupled aeropropulsive optimization of a three-dimensional boundary-layer ingestion propulsor considering inlet distortion
    Gray, Justin S.
    Mader, Charles A.
    Kenway, Gaetan K. W.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    1600, AIAA International (57): : 1014 - 1025
  • [2] Coupled aeropropulsive design optimisation of a boundary-layer ingestion propulsor
    Gray, J. S.
    Martins, J. R. R. A.
    AERONAUTICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 123 (1259): : 121 - 137
  • [3] Modeling Boundary Layer Ingestion Using a Coupled Aeropropulsive Analysis
    Gray, Justin S.
    Mader, Charles A.
    Kenway, Gaetan K. W.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2018, 55 (03): : 1191 - 1199
  • [4] Aeropropulsive Performance Analysis of Axisymmetric Fuselage Bodies for Boundary-Layer Ingestion Applications
    Baskaran, Pradeep
    Corte, Biagio Della
    van Sluis, Martijn
    Rao, Arvind Gangoli
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2022, 60 (03) : 1592 - 1611
  • [5] Mechanism of three-dimensional boundary-layer receptivity
    Luyu Shen
    Changgen Lu
    Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2017, 38 : 1213 - 1224
  • [6] Mechanism of three-dimensional boundary-layer receptivity
    Shen, Luyu
    Lu, Changgen
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS-ENGLISH EDITION, 2017, 38 (09) : 1213 - 1224
  • [7] Mechanism of three-dimensional boundary-layer receptivity
    Luyu SHEN
    Changgen LU
    Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition), 2017, 38 (09) : 1213 - 1224
  • [8] CALCULATION OF SCRAMJET INLET WITH THICK BOUNDARY-LAYER INGESTION
    LAI, HT
    KIM, SC
    JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 1994, 10 (05) : 625 - 630
  • [9] Behavior of flow distortion within a boundary layer ingestion inlet
    Wang, Kun
    Liu, Lei
    Huang, He-xia
    Tan, Hui-jun
    Tang, Xue-bin
    Zheng, Gao-jie
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 146
  • [10] Coherent structure in three-dimensional boundary-layer transition
    Kohama, Y.
    Reports of the Laboratory for Air-Flow Measurements, the Institute of High Speed Mechanics, Tohoku University, 1988, 4