Determining a global mid-upper arm circumference cut-off to assess underweight in adults (men and non-pregnant women)

被引:37
|
作者
Tang, Alice M. [1 ]
Chung, Mei [1 ]
Dong, Kimberly R. [1 ]
Bahwere, Paluku [2 ]
Bose, Kaushik [3 ]
Chakraborty, Raja [4 ]
Charlton, Karen [5 ,6 ]
Das, Priyanka [3 ]
Ghosh, Mihir [3 ]
Hossain, Iqbal [7 ]
Phuong Nguyen [8 ]
Patsche, Cecilie B. [9 ,10 ]
Sultana, Tania [7 ]
Deitchler, Megan [11 ]
Maalouf-Manasseh, Zeina
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Valid Int, Oxford, England
[3] Vidyasagar Univ, Dept Anthropol, Midnapore, W Bengal, India
[4] Dinabandhu Mahavidyalaya, Dept Anthropol, Bongaon, W Bengal, India
[5] Univ Wollongong, Sch Med, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[6] Illawarra Hlth & Med Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[7] Int Ctr Diarrhoeal Dis Res, Nutr & Clin Serv Div, Dhaka, Bangladesh
[8] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Poverty Hlth & Nutr Div, Washington, DC USA
[9] Aarhus Univ, Ctr Global Hlth GloHAU, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus C, Denmark
[10] INDEPTH Network, Bandim Hlth Project, Bissau, Guinea Bissau
[11] FHI360, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Mid-upper arm circumference; Nutritional screening; Underweight; Individual participant data meta-analysis; Low BMI; Cut-off; BODY-MASS INDEX; NEGATIVE DRUG-USERS; SLUM DWELLERS; CLINICAL PREDICTORS; NUTRITIONAL-STATUS; METABOLIC SYNDROME; MORTALITY; MALNUTRITION; POPULATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1017/S1368980020000397
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine if a global mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) cut-off can be established to classify underweight in adults (men and non-pregnant women). Design: We conducted an individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) to explore the sensitivity (SENS) and specificity (SPEC) of various MUAC cut-offs for identifying underweight among adults (defined as BMI < 18 center dot 5 kg/m(2)). Measures of diagnostic accuracy were determined every 0 center dot 5 cm across MUAC values from 19 center dot 0 to 26 center dot 5 cm. A bivariate random effects model was used to jointly estimate SENS and SPEC while accounting for heterogeneity between studies. Various subgroup analyses were performed. Setting: Twenty datasets from Africa, South Asia, Southeast Asia, North America and South America were included. Participants: All eligible participants from the original datasets were included. Results: The total sample size was 13 835. Mean age was 32 center dot 6 years and 65 % of participants were female. Mean MUAC was 25 center dot 7 cm, and 28 % of all participants had low BMI (<18 center dot 5 kg/m(2)). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the pooled dataset was 0 center dot 91 (range across studies 0 center dot 61-0 center dot 98). Results showed that MUAC cut-offs in the range of <= 23 center dot 5 to <= 25 center dot 0 cm could serve as an appropriate screening indicator for underweight. Conclusions: MUAC is highly discriminatory in its ability to distinguish adults with BMI above and below 18 center dot 5 kg/m(2). This IPDMA is the first step towards determining a global MUAC cut-off for adults. Validation studies are needed to determine whether the proposed MUAC cut-off of 24 cm is associated with poor functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:3104 / 3113
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Global mid-upper arm circumference cut-offs for adults: a call to action
    Maalouf-Manasseh, Zeina
    Remancus, Sandra
    Milner, Erin
    Fenlason, Lindy
    Quick, Timothy
    Patsche, Cecilie B.
    Bose, Kaushik
    Collins, Steve
    Ververs, Mija
    Walia, Sonia
    Escobar-Alegria, Jessica
    Chung, Mei
    Tang, Alice M.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2020, 23 (17) : 3114 - 3115
  • [2] Mid-upper arm circumference in pregnant women and its relation to birth weight
    Ricalde, AE
    Velasquez-Melendez, G
    Tanaka, ACD
    de Siqueira, AAF
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 1998, 32 (02): : 112 - 117
  • [3] Mid-upper arm circumference: A surrogate for body mass index in pregnant women
    Fakier, A.
    Petro, G.
    Fawcus, S.
    SAMJ SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 107 (07): : 606 - 610
  • [4] Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status
    Mishra, Kumar Guru
    Bhatia, Vikas
    Nayak, Ranjeeta
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2020, 9 (07) : 3321 - 3327
  • [5] Performance of WHO mid-upper arm circumference cut-off to diagnose severe acute malnutrition in under-fives
    Aditya, Fahreza Neldy
    Yuliarti, Klara
    Andriastuti, Murti
    PAEDIATRICA INDONESIANA, 2024, 64 (05) : 397 - 402
  • [6] Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
    Thorup, Lene
    Hamann, Sophie Amalie
    Kallestrup, Per
    Hjortdal, Vibeke Elisabeth
    Tripathee, Ashish
    Neupane, Dinesh
    Patsche, Cecilie Blenstrup
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [7] Mid-upper arm circumference as an indicator of underweight in adults: a cross-sectional study from Nepal
    Lene Thorup
    Sophie Amalie Hamann
    Per Kallestrup
    Vibeke Elisabeth Hjortdal
    Ashish Tripathee
    Dinesh Neupane
    Cecilie Blenstrup Patsche
    BMC Public Health, 20
  • [8] Validating the MUAC (Mid-upper arm circumference) Cut-off for Detection of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children Aged 6–59 Months in Rural Maharashtra
    Reshma Sougaijam
    SS Gupta
    AV Raut
    MS Bharambe
    BS Garg
    Indian Pediatrics, 2019, 56 : 209 - 212
  • [9] Validating the MUAC (Mid-upper arm circumference) Cut-off for Detection of Severe Acute Malnutrition in Children Aged 6-59 Months in Rural Maharashtra
    Sougaijam, R.
    Gupta, S. S.
    Raut, A. V.
    Bharambe, M. S.
    Garg, B. S.
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2019, 56 (03) : 209 - 212
  • [10] Association between mid-upper arm circumference and body mass index in pregnant women to assess their nutritional status (vol 9, pg 3321, 2020)
    Mishra, Kumar Guru
    Bhatia, Vikas
    Nayak, Ranjeeta
    Singh, Arvind K.
    Parida, Swayam P.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2020, 9 (09) : 5085 - 5085