A hybrid Coasean and Pigouvian approach to Payment for Ecosystem Services Program in West Lombok: Does it contribute to poverty alleviation?

被引:36
|
作者
Diswandi, Diswandi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mataram, Fac Econ & Business, Jalan Majapahit 62, Mataram Lombok 83125, Indonesia
[2] Murdoch Univ, Asia Res Ctr, Sch Business & Governance, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
关键词
PES; Ecosystem services; Community forestry; Poverty alleviation; Participatory econometrics approach; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; DEVELOPING-COUNTRIES; FOREST DEGRADATION; REDUCING EMISSIONS; COSTA-RICA; PES; CONSERVATION; DEFORESTATION; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.005
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) concept is mainly based on Coasean economics theory that emphasizes the creation of a voluntary or market-based transaction for ecosystem services. Alternatively, many PES practiced in developing countries are based on Pigouvian economic theory allowing government intervention such as through regulation, tax or subsidy. A hybrid PES approach that compound Coasean and Pigouvian theory was developed in West Lombok Indonesia leading to a new policy paradigm that combines elements of both a voluntary market-based and mandatory policy-based system. This study aims to assess how the hybrid PES program contributes to poverty alleviation. By employing a participatory econometrics approach, this study found that the hybrid PES system does not contribute to poverty alleviation in shortterm. It is possible that this PES program contributes to poverty alleviation in long-term.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 145
页数:8
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Does Poverty Matter in Payment for Ecosystem Services Program? Participation in the New Stage Sloping Land Conversion Program
    Ren, Linjing
    Li, Jie
    Li, Cong
    Li, Shuzhuo
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (06):
  • [2] How does payment for watershed ecosystem services alleviate farmer poverty in conservation intervention areas? Evidence from China
    Lu, Wenxiu
    Ma, Jia
    Wu, Fangwei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 74 (02) : 180 - 191
  • [3] Only One Tree from Each Seed? Environmental Effectiveness and Poverty Alleviation in Mexico's Payments for Ecosystem Services Program
    Alix-Garcia, Jennifer M.
    Sims, Katharine R. E.
    Yanez-Pagans, Patricia
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2015, 7 (04) : 1 - 40
  • [4] How does governance mediate links between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation? Results from a systematic mapping and thematic synthesis of literature
    Nunan, Fiona
    Menton, Mary
    McDermott, Constance L.
    Huxham, Mark
    Schreckenberg, Kate
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 146
  • [5] Does China's Anti-Poverty Relocation and Settlement Program Benefit Ecosystem Services: Evidence from a Household Perspective
    Li, Cong
    Kang, Bowei
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Shuzhuo
    Feldman, Marcus
    Li, Jie
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (03)
  • [6] Does China's major Payment for Ecosystem Services program meet the "gold criteria"? Targeting strategies of different decision-makers
    Ren, Linjing
    Li, Jie
    Li, Shuzhuo
    Li, Cong
    Daily, Gretchen C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 275