Concomitant or late aortic valve intervention and its efficacy for aortic insufficiency associated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation

被引:3
|
作者
Ando, Masahiko [1 ]
Ono, Minoru [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Tokyo, Japan
来源
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
left ventricular assist device (LVAD); aortic insufficiency (AI); aortic valve replacement (AVR); aortic valve repair (AV repair); heart transplant (HTx); REGURGITATION; REPLACEMENT; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; PATIENT; CLOSURE; REPAIR; PREVALENCE; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2022.1029984
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI) in patients who underwent continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation is a significant complication. According to the INTERMACS registry analysis, at least mild AI occurs in 55% of patients at 6 months after CF-LVAD implantation and moderate to severe AI is significantly associated with higher rates of re-hospitalization and mortality. The clinical implications of these data may underscore consideration of prophylactic aortic valve replacement, or repair, at the time of CF-LVAD implantation, particularly with expected longer duration of support and in patients with preexisting AI that is more than mild. More crucially, even if a native aortic valve is seemingly competent at the time of VAD implantation, we frequently find de novo AI as time goes by, potentially due to commissural fusion in the setting of inconsistent aortic valve opening or persistent valve closure caused by CF-LVAD support, that alters morphological and functional properties of innately competent aortic valves. Therefore, close monitoring of AI is mandatory, as the prognostic nature of its longitudinal progression is still unclear. Clearly, significant AI during VAD support warrants surgical intervention at the appropriate timing, especially in patients of destination therapy. Nonetheless, such an uncertainty in the progression of AI translates to a lack of consensus regarding the management of this untoward complication. In practice, proposed surgical options are aortic valve replacement, repair, closure, and more recently transcatheter aortic valve implantation or closure. Transcatheter approach is of course less invasive, however, its efficacy in terms of long-term outcome is limited. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence related to the pathophysiology and surgical treatment of AI associated with CF-LVAD implantation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Aortic Valve Repair at the Time of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Melnitchouk, S.
    Takayama, H.
    Jorde, U.
    Uriel, N.
    Colombo, P.
    Yang, J.
    Mancini, D.
    Naka, Y.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 30 (04): : S94 - S95
  • [2] Monitoring of Aortic Valve Opening and Systolic Aortic Insufficiency in Optimization of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Settings
    Gologorsky, Edward
    Gologorsky, Angela
    Pham, Si M.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2012, 26 (06) : 1063 - 1066
  • [3] Aortic valve closure for rapidly deteriorated aortic insufficiency after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Tomoyuki Fujita
    Junjiro Kobayashi
    Hiroki Hata
    Osamu Seguchi
    Takuma Sato
    Masanobu Yanase
    Yoshihiro Murata
    Haruki Sunami
    Takeshi Nakatani
    Journal of Artificial Organs, 2013, 16 : 98 - 100
  • [4] Aortic valve closure for rapidly deteriorated aortic insufficiency after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation
    Fujita, Tomoyuki
    Kobayashi, Junjiro
    Hata, Hiroki
    Seguchi, Osamu
    Sato, Takuma
    Yanase, Masanobu
    Murata, Yoshihiro
    Sunami, Haruki
    Nakatani, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2013, 16 (01) : 98 - 100
  • [5] Concomitant repair for mild aortic insufficiency and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Fukuhara, Shinichi
    Ikegami, Hirohisa
    Polanco, Antonio R.
    Song, Jeremy J.
    Han, Jiho
    Takeda, Koji
    Kurlansky, Paul A.
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (06) : 1062 - 1068
  • [6] Evaluation of late aortic insufficiency with continuous flow left ventricular assist device
    Hiraoka, Arudo
    Cohen, Jeffrey E.
    Shudo, Yasuhiro
    MacArthur, John W., Jr.
    Howard, Jessica L.
    Fairman, Alexander S.
    Atluri, Pavan
    Kirkpatrick, James N.
    Woo, Y. Joseph
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 48 (03) : 400 - 406
  • [7] Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation with Concomitant Aortic Valve and Ascending Aortic Replacement
    Huenges, Katharina
    Panholzer, Bernd
    Cremer, Jochen
    Haneya, Assad
    CASE REPORTS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 2018
  • [8] Concomitant Transcatheter Aortic Valve and Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Baum, Christina
    Seiffert, Moritz
    Treede, Hendrik
    Reichenspurner, Hermann
    Deuse, Tobias
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2013, 59 (01) : 90 - 92
  • [9] Left ventricular assist device implantation and concomitant aortic valve replacement
    Mikic, Aleksandar
    Nestorovic, Emilija
    Bilbija, Ilija
    Terzic, Dusko
    Putnik, Svetozar
    SRPSKI ARHIV ZA CELOKUPNO LEKARSTVO, 2019, 147 (11-12) : 758 - 761
  • [10] Clinical Implications of Concomitant Surgical Intervention for Aortic Insufficiency with Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
    Mullan, C. W.
    Mori, M.
    Caraballo, C.
    Ravindra, N. G.
    Miller, E.
    McCullough, M.
    Clarke, J. D.
    Geirsson, A.
    Desai, N. R.
    Ahmad, T.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 39 (04): : S440 - S440