Close Reading as an Intervention for Struggling Middle School Readers

被引:22
|
作者
Fisher, Douglas [1 ]
Frey, Nancy [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci High & Middle Coll, San Diego, CA 92105 USA
关键词
Comprehension; Comprehension monitoring; Depth of (higher level; literal level; etc; Metacognition; Questioning; Text features; text structure; Language learners; Oral language; Discussion; Strategies; methods; and materials; Discussion strategies; Instructional models; Instructional strategies; teaching strategies; Learning strategies; Reading strategies; Struggling learners; At-risk factors; Instructional intervention; Self-perception; self-concept; Early adolescence; Adolescence; STUDENTS; FLUENCY; COMPREHENSION; ADOLESCENT; LITERACY; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1002/jaal.266
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Thousands and thousands of middle school students around the world participate in reading intervention programs, many that are very expensive with limited effectiveness. We wanted to know if an after-school intervention focused on close reading procedures could improve student achievement. Close reading of complex text involves annotations, repeated reading, text-dependent questions, and discussions. This manuscript reports on 75 students in grades 7-8 who received the close reading intervention and compares their outcomes with 247 students who received a traditional intervention. Results suggest that close reading can be an effective intervention, with significant increases in student attendance, self-perception, and achievement.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 376
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers
    Paul T. Cirino
    Melissa A. Romain
    Amy E. Barth
    Tammy D. Tolar
    Jack M. Fletcher
    Sharon Vaughn
    [J]. Reading and Writing, 2013, 26 : 1059 - 1086
  • [2] Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers
    Cirino, Paul T.
    Romain, Melissa A.
    Barth, Amy E.
    Tolar, Tammy D.
    Fletcher, Jack M.
    Vaughn, Sharon
    [J]. READING AND WRITING, 2013, 26 (07) : 1059 - 1086
  • [3] The influence of student engagement on the effects of an inferential reading comprehension intervention for struggling middle school readers
    Martinez-Lincoln, Amanda
    Barnes, Marcia A.
    Clemens, Nathan H.
    [J]. ANNALS OF DYSLEXIA, 2021, 71 (02) : 322 - 345
  • [4] The influence of student engagement on the effects of an inferential reading comprehension intervention for struggling middle school readers
    Amanda Martinez-Lincoln
    Marcia A. Barnes
    Nathan H. Clemens
    [J]. Annals of Dyslexia, 2021, 71 : 322 - 345
  • [5] The Limerick Reading Initiative: a reading intervention targeted at struggling readers in primary school
    O'Rourke, Diarmuid
    Olshtroon, Aoife
    O'Halloran, Claire
    [J]. SUPPORT FOR LEARNING, 2016, 31 (02) : 148 - 163
  • [6] Four methods of identifying change in the context of a multiple component reading intervention for struggling middle school readers
    Jan C. Frijters
    Maureen W. Lovett
    Rose A. Sevcik
    Robin D. Morris
    [J]. Reading and Writing, 2013, 26 : 539 - 563
  • [7] Four methods of identifying change in the context of a multiple component reading intervention for struggling middle school readers
    Frijters, Jan C.
    Lovett, Maureen W.
    Sevcik, Rose A.
    Morris, Robin D.
    [J]. READING AND WRITING, 2013, 26 (04) : 539 - 563
  • [8] Supporting struggling readers at secondary school: an intervention of reading strategy instruction
    Wu, Lin
    Valcke, Martin
    Van Keer, Hilde
    [J]. READING AND WRITING, 2021, 34 (08) : 2175 - 2201
  • [9] Supporting struggling readers at secondary school: an intervention of reading strategy instruction
    Lin Wu
    Martin Valcke
    Hilde Van Keer
    [J]. Reading and Writing, 2021, 34 : 2175 - 2201
  • [10] Motivation for reading among struggling middle school readers: A mixed methods study
    Louick, Rebecca
    Leider, Christine M.
    Daley, Samantha G.
    Proctor, C. Patrick
    Gardner, Graham L.
    [J]. LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 49 : 260 - 269