Cost-effectiveness of maintenance hormonal therapy in patients with advanced low grade serous ovarian cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Nica, Andra [1 ]
Lee, Ji Young Jennifer [2 ]
Hong, Nicole Look [3 ]
May, Taymaa [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Pediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma; Maintenance therapy; Letrozole; Cost-effectiveness; PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; POSITIVE BREAST-CANCER; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; PERITONEAL CANCER; TAMOXIFEN THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; FALLOPIAN-TUBE; LETROZOLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.051
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives. To assess the cost-effectiveness of using maintenance hormonal therapy in patients with low grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC). Methods. A simulated decision analysis with a Markov decision model over a lifetime horizon was performed using the base case of a 47-year old patient with stage IIIC, LGSC following first-line treatment with primary cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Two treatment strategies were analyzed - maintenance daily letrozole until disease progression and routine observation. The analysis was from the perspective of the healthcare payer. Direct medical costs were estimated using public data sources and previous literature and were reported in adjusted 2018 Canadian dollars. The model estimated lifetime cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), life years (LY), median overall survival (OS), and number of recurrences with each strategy. Cost-effectiveness was compared using an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). A strategy was considered cost-effective when the ICER was less than the willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000 CAD per QALY. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of changing key clinical and cost variables. Results. Maintenance letrozole was the preferred strategy with an associated lifetime cost of $69,985 CAD (552,620 USD) and an observed improvement of 0.91 QALYs and 1.55 LYs. The ICER for letrozole maintenance therapy was an additional $11,037 CAD ($8298 USD) per QALY. The modeled median OS was 150 months with maintenance letrozole and 126 months in the observation strategy. The maintenance letrozole strategy resulted in 34% and 17% fewer first recurrences at 5-year and 10-year follow-up, respectively. Conclusion. Maintenance letrozole is a cost-effective treatment strategy in patients with advanced LGSC resulting in clinically-relevant improvement in QALYs, LYs, and fewer disease recurrences. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 213
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of maintenance hormonal therapy in patients with advanced low-grade serous ovarian cancer
    Nica, A. I.
    Lee, J. J. Y.
    Hong, N. Look
    May, T.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 : 107 - 107
  • [2] Trametinib for patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Piao, Huiling
    Wu, Meiyu
    Qin, Shuxia
    Tang, Zhiyao
    Zhou, Guangliang
    Wan, Xiaomin
    Zuo, Xiaocong
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 168 : 17 - 22
  • [3] Hormonal Maintenance Therapy for Women With Low-Grade Serous Cancer of the Ovary or Peritoneum
    Gershenson, David M.
    Bodurka, Diane C.
    Coleman, Robert L.
    Lu, Karen H.
    Malpica, Anais
    Sun, Charlotte C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (10) : 1103 - +
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of adding bevacizumab to first line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer
    Mehta, Darshan A.
    Hay, Joel W.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (03) : 677 - 683
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness of maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer: Paclitaxel, bevacizumab, niraparib, rucaparib, olaparib, and pembrolizumab
    Wolford, Juliet Elizabeth
    Bai, Jiaru
    Minion, Lindsey E.
    Keller, Robin
    Eskander, Ramez Nassef
    Chan, John K.
    Monk, Bradley J.
    Tewari, Krishnansu Sujata
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing degarelix with leuprolide in hormonal therapy for patients with locally advanced prostate cancer
    Hatoum, Hind T.
    Crawford, E. David
    Nielsen, Sandy Kildegaard
    Lin, Swu-Jane
    Marshall, Dennis C.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (02) : 261 - 270
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF HORMONAL THERAPIES IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER IN ITALY
    Iannazzo, S.
    Pradelli, L.
    Perachino, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2009, 12 (07) : A280 - A280
  • [8] Cost-Effectiveness of Niraparib and Olaparib as Maintenance Therapy for Patients with Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
    Zhong, Lixian
    Anh Thu Tran
    Tomasino, Taylor
    Nugent, Elizabeth
    Smith, Judith A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2018, 24 (12): : 1219 - 1228
  • [9] Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel as alternative combination therapy for advanced ovarian cancer
    McGuire, W
    Neugut, AI
    Arikian, S
    Doyle, JL
    Dezii, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (02) : 640 - 645
  • [10] PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: A cost-effectiveness analysis
    Smith, Haller J.
    Haygood, Christen L. Walters
    Arend, Rebecca C.
    Leath, Charles A., III
    Straughn, Michael, Jr.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 139 (01) : 59 - 62