Sequential parallel comparison design with binary and time-to-event outcomes

被引:12
|
作者
Silverman, Rachel Kloss [1 ]
Ivanova, Anastasia [1 ]
Fine, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Biostat, CB 7420, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
placebo lead-in; placebo response; sequential parallel comparison design; SPCD; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PSYCHIATRIC CLINICAL-TRIALS; GENERATING SURVIVAL TIMES; PLACEBO-RESPONSE; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1002/sim.7635
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sequential parallel comparison design (SPCD) has been proposed to increase the likelihood of success of clinical trials especially trials with possibly high placebo effect. Sequential parallel comparison design is conducted with 2 stages. Participants are randomized between active therapy and placebo in stage 1. Then, stage 1 placebo nonresponders are rerandomized between active therapy and placebo. Data from the 2 stages are pooled to yield a single P value. We consider SPCD with binary and with time-to-event outcomes. For time-to-event outcomes, response is defined as a favorable event prior to the end of follow-up for a given stage of SPCD. We show that for these cases, the usual test statistics from stages 1 and 2 are asymptotically normal and uncorrelated under the null hypothesis, leading to a straightforward combined testing procedure. In addition, we show that the estimators of the treatment effects from the 2 stages are asymptotically normal and uncorrelated under the null and alternative hypothesis, yielding confidence interval procedures with correct coverage. Simulations and real data analysis demonstrate the utility of the binary and time-to-event SPCD.
引用
收藏
页码:1454 / 1466
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Bayesian Sequential Design for Clinical Trials With Time-to-Event Outcomes
    Zhu, Lin
    Yu, Qingzhao
    Mercante, Donald E.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 11 (04): : 387 - 397
  • [2] Group sequential design for time-to-event data using the concept of proportional time
    Phadnis, Milind A.
    Mayo, Matthew S.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (07) : 1867 - 1890
  • [3] Familywise error for multiple time-to-event endpoints in a group sequential design
    Thomsen, Henrik F.
    Lausvig, Nanna L.
    Pipper, Christian B.
    Andersen, Soren
    Damgaard, Lars H.
    Emerson, Scott S.
    Ravn, Henrik
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (18) : 3417 - 3431
  • [4] Notes on Use of the Odds Ratio under the Sequential Parallel Comparison Design with Binary Outcomes
    Lui, Kung-Jong
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 10 (03): : 213 - 219
  • [5] A class of two-sample nonparametric statistics for binary and time-to-event outcomes
    Bofill Roig, Marta
    Gomez Melis, Guadalupe
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (02) : 225 - 239
  • [6] A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
    Debray, Thomas P. A.
    Damen, Johanna A. A. G.
    Riley, Richard D.
    Snell, Kym
    Reitsma, Johannes B.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Collins, Gary S.
    Moons, Karel G. M.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (09) : 2768 - 2786
  • [7] Sequential tests of promise with discrete time-to-event data
    Levin, Bruce
    Kuhn, Louise
    Leu, Cheng-Shiun
    Tsai, Wei-Yann
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2019, 85
  • [8] SIMULATED TREATMENT COMPARISON OF TIME-TO-EVENT (AND OTHER NON-LINEAR) OUTCOMES
    Ishak, K. J.
    Rael, M.
    Phatak, H.
    Masseria, C.
    Lanitis, T.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A719 - A719
  • [9] On selecting the critical boundary functions in group-sequential trials with two time-to-event outcomes
    Hamasaki, Toshimitsu
    Hung, H. M. James
    Hsiao, Chin-Fu
    Evans, Scott R.
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 101
  • [10] Reflections on the Win Ratio With Time-to-Event Outcomes
    Wittes, Janet
    [J]. CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2024, 17 (09)