On the optimal progressivity of the income tax code

被引:116
|
作者
Conesa, Juan Carlos
Krueger, Dirk
机构
[1] Univ Frankfurt, Dept Econ & Business, D-60054 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] CEPR, London, England
[5] NBER, Gaithersburg, MD USA
关键词
progressive taxation; optimal taxation; flat taxes; social insurance; transition;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.03.016
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper computes the optimal progressivity of the income tax code in a dynamic general equilibrium model with household heterogeneity in which uninsurable labor productivity risk gives rise to a nontrivial income and wealth distribution. A progressive tax system serves as a partial substitute for missing insurance markets and enhances an equal distribution of economic welfare. These beneficial effects of a progressive tax system have to be traded off against the efficiency loss arising from distorting endogenous labor supply and capital accumulation decisions. Using a utilitarian steady state social welfare criterion we find that the optimal US income tax is well approximated by a flat tax rate of 17.2% and a fixed deduction of about $9,400. The steady state welfare gains from a fundamental tax reform towards this tax system are equivalent to 1.7% higher consumption in each state of the world. An explicit computation of the transition path induced by a reform of the current towards the optimal tax system indicates that a majority of the population currently alive (roughly 62%) would experience welfare gains, suggesting that such fundamental income tax reform is not only desirable, but may also be politically feasible. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1425 / 1450
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal Progressivity of Public Pension Benefit and Labor Income Tax
    Lee, Insook
    [J]. HACIENDA PUBLICA ESPANOLA-REVIEW OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2023, 246 : 3 - 35
  • [2] Is there a demand for income tax progressivity?
    Hindriks, J
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2001, 73 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [3] Optimal progressivity of personal income tax: a general equilibrium evaluation for Spain
    Darío Serrano-Puente
    [J]. SERIEs, 2020, 11 : 407 - 455
  • [4] INCOME INEQUALITY AND THE PROGRESSIVITY OF AN INCOME-TAX
    THEIL, H
    [J]. REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 1988, 46 (03) : 252 - 254
  • [5] Optimal progressivity of personal income tax: a general equilibrium evaluation for Spain
    Serrano-Puente, Dario
    [J]. SERIES-JOURNAL OF THE SPANISH ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2020, 11 (04): : 407 - 455
  • [6] Income Tax Progressivity: Trends and Implications
    Gerber, Claudia
    Klemm, Alexander
    Liu, Li
    Mylonas, Victor
    [J]. OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2020, 82 (02) : 365 - 386
  • [7] Income tax progressivity, growth, income inequality and welfare
    Echevarria, Cruz A.
    [J]. SERIES-JOURNAL OF THE SPANISH ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2015, 6 (01): : 43 - 72
  • [8] Tax progressivity and income inequality in the US
    Jalles, Joao Tovar
    Karras, Georgios
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 238
  • [9] PROGRESSIVITY OF UTILITARIAN INCOME-TAX
    ROMER, T
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE-FINANCES PUBLIQUES, 1976, 31 (03): : 414 - 426
  • [10] STATE INCOME-TAX PROGRESSIVITY
    FORMBY, JP
    SYKES, D
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY, 1984, 12 (02): : 153 - 165