Active flow separation control on wall-mounted hump at high Reynolds numbers

被引:108
|
作者
Seifert, A [1 ]
Pack, LG
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Fluid Mech & Heat Transfer, Fac Engn, IL-69978 Ramat Aviv, Israel
[2] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Flow Phys & Control Branch, Hampton, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.2514/2.1796
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
An active separation control experiment was conducted in a cryogenic pressurized wind tunnel on a wall-mounted bump at chord Reynolds numbers from 2.4 x 10(6) to 26 x 10(6) and a Mach number of 0.25. The model simulates the upper surface of a 20% thick Glauert-Goldschmied-type airfoil at zero incidence. The turbulent boundary layer of the tunnel sidewall flows over the model and eliminates laminar-turbulent transition from the problem. Indeed, the Reynolds number either based on the chord or boundary-layer thickness had a negligible effect on the flow and its control. Without control, a large turbulent separation bubble is formed at the lee side of the model. Periodic excitation and steady suction or blowing were applied to eliminate gradually the separation bubble. Detailed effects due to variations in the excitation frequency, amplitude, and the steady mass flux are described and compared to those of steady suction or blowing. It was found that the amplitude of the most effective frequency for separation control is rapidly attenuated in the reattachment region. The superposition of weak steady suction enhances the receptivity of the separated shear layer to the fundamental excitation frequency and, therefore, the effectiveness of the periodic excitation, whereas weak steady blowing promotes the generation of higher harmonics and reduces the excitation effectiveness. Separation control using periodic excitation and weak suction are similar in both effectiveness and dynamics, whereas steady blowing generates steadier flow but is of inferior effectiveness and is abrupt in nature and is, therefore, not suitable for closed-loop control. The data set enhances the understanding of active separation control at high Reynolds numbers and is a proper validation case for unsteady numerical design tools.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1372
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Large-eddy simulation of separation control for flow over a wall-mounted hump
    Morgan, Philip E.
    Rizzetta, Donald P.
    Visbal, Miguel R.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2007, 45 (11) : 2643 - 2660
  • [2] Large-eddy simulation of flow over a wall-mounted hump with separation control
    You, Donghyun
    Wang, Meng
    Moin, Parviz
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (11) : 2571 - 2577
  • [3] Separation Flow Control on a Wall-Mounted Hump Using Pneumatically Enhanced/Deployed Actuators
    Kale, Nachiket V.
    Dutton, J. Craig
    Elliott, Gregory S.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (11) : 2747 - 2750
  • [4] Large-eddy simulation of flow over a wall-mounted hump with separation control
    You, Donghyun
    Wang, Meng
    Moin, Parviz
    AIAA Journal, 2006, 44 (11): : 2571 - 2577
  • [5] ACTIVE SEPARATION CONTROL OF FLOW OVER A WALL-MOUNTED HUMP USING ZERO-EFFLUX SYNTHETIC JET
    Gan, Subhadeep
    Ghia, Urmila
    Ghia, Karman
    IMECE 2008: HEAT TRANSFER, FLUID FLOWS, AND THERMAL SYSTEMS, VOL 10, PTS A-C, 2009, : 959 - 967
  • [6] Experimental analysis of Reynolds effect on flow detachment and sudden flow release on a wall-mounted hump
    Saavedra, Jorge
    Paniagua, Guillermo
    EXPERIMENTAL THERMAL AND FLUID SCIENCE, 2021, 126
  • [7] Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow separation from a wall-mounted hump
    Postl, Dieter
    Fasel, Hermann F.
    AIAA Journal, 2006, 44 (02): : 263 - 272
  • [8] Effects of Actuation Frequency on Flow Control Applied to a Wall-Mounted Hump
    Franck, Jennifer A.
    Colonius, Tim
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2012, 50 (07) : 1631 - 1634
  • [9] Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow separation from a wall-mounted hump
    Postl, D
    Fasel, HF
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2006, 44 (02) : 263 - 272
  • [10] Compressible Large-Eddy Simulation of Separation Control on a Wall-Mounted Hump
    Franck, Jennifer A.
    Colonius, Tim
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2010, 48 (06) : 1098 - 1107