Transfer rates from freestanding birth centers - A comparison with the National Birth Center Study

被引:11
|
作者
Fullerton, JT
Jackson, D
Snell, BJ
Besser, M
Dickinson, C
Garite, T
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,HLTH SCI CTR,GRAD NURSING PROGRAM,SAN ANTONIO,TX
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH NURSING,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[3] UNIV CALIF IRVINE,NURSE MIDWIFERY SERV & EDUC,IRVINE,CA 92717
[4] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT REPROD MED,LA JOLLA,CA 92093
[5] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT PEDIAT,LA JOLLA,CA 92093
[6] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,MED CTR,LA JOLLA,CA 92093
[7] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,COMPREHENS PREINATAL PROGRAM,LA JOLLA,CA 92093
来源
JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY | 1997年 / 42卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0091-2182(96)00104-8
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
This article reviews retrospective data derived from Sharp The BirthPlace, San Diego for 1993-94 and from the University of California, Irvine, Birthing Center for 1994 and compares these findings to data obtained from the National Birth Center Study (NBCS). The focus of this article is on intrapartum transfer rates from the two freestanding birth centers as a critical clinical indicator. Cause-specific transfer rates were calculated for eight clinical conditions. Data suggest that cause-specific intrapartum transfer rates are influenced by factors such as risk profile of the client population, distance to the referral center and mechanisms of transfer, definitions and diagnostic criteria used, and clinical practice guidelines. Reports from the literature, such as NBCS data, might serve as points of reference, but are likely not appropriate baseline indicators (benchmarks of ''best practice'') for clinical events, against which individual performance can be measured; rather, these benchmarks should be individually defined, based on characteristics unique to each birth center. (C) 1997 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 16
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OUTCOMES OF CARE IN BIRTH CENTERS - THE NATIONAL-BIRTH-CENTER STUDY
    ROOKS, JP
    WEATHERBY, NL
    ERNST, EKM
    STAPLETON, S
    ROSEN, D
    ROSENFIELD, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (26): : 1804 - 1811
  • [2] THE FREESTANDING BIRTH CENTER
    BENNETTS, AB
    LUBIC, RW
    [J]. LANCET, 1982, 1 (8268): : 378 - 380
  • [3] FREESTANDING BIRTH CENTERS - PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS
    EAKINS, PS
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1988, 15 (01): : 25 - 30
  • [4] Freestanding Birth Centers: An Evidence-Based Option for Birth
    Alliman, Jill
    Bauer, Kate
    Williams, Trinisha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2022, 31 (01): : 8 - 13
  • [5] Birth centers in Australia: A national population-based study of perinatal mortality associated with giving birth in a birth center
    Tracy, Sally K.
    Dahlen, Hannah
    Caplice, Shea
    Laws, Paula
    Wang, Yueping Alex
    Tracy, Mark B.
    Sullivan, Elizabeth
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2007, 34 (03): : 194 - 201
  • [6] The safety of birth centers:: Response to a critique of the Stockholm birth center study
    Waldenstrom, Ulla
    Grunewald, Charlotta
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2006, 33 (02): : 165 - 167
  • [7] FREESTANDING BIRTH CENTERS - SAFE, SENSITIVE CARE
    ERNST, EKM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1990, 80 (03) : 352 - 352
  • [8] Results of the national study of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in Birth Centers
    Hodges, S
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 897 - 897
  • [9] Results of the national study of vaginal birth after cesarean in birth centers
    Lieberman, E
    Ernst, EK
    Rooks, JP
    Stapleton, S
    Flamm, B
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 104 (05): : 933 - 942
  • [10] SALUTING THE NATIONAL BIRTH CENTER STUDY
    KRAUS, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1992, 37 (06): : 359 - 360