Predicting Academic Cheating with Triarchic Psychopathy and Cheating Attitudes

被引:2
|
作者
Ljubin-Golub, Tajana [1 ]
Petricevic, Ema [1 ]
Sokic, Katarina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Teacher Educ, Savska Cesta 77, Zagreb 1000, Croatia
[2] Univ Coll, Effectus Coll Law & Finance, Trg JF Kennedy 2, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
Personality; Triarchic psychopathy; Cheating attitudes; Academic dishonesty; DARK TRIAD; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; HEXACO MODEL; PERSONALITY; STUDENTS; CONCEPTUALIZATION; DISHONESTY; INTEGRITY; BOLDNESS; HONESTY;
D O I
10.1007/s10805-019-09338-0
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent research has suggested that both the Honesty-Humility dimension, psychopathic traits and cheating attitudes are important predictors of academic dishonesty. The present study examined: a) the incremental role of triarchic psychopathic traits in academic cheating over the Honesty-Humility dimension; b) the incremental role of cheating attitudes over personality; c) the mediating role of cheating attitudes in the relationship between different psychopathic components and academic cheating. Two-hundred-and-ninty-seven students (59% female, 23 years on average) completed several questionnaires: the Triarchic Psychopathy Measure (TriPM), The HEXACO-PI-R Honesty-Humility scale, Attitudes Toward Cheating Scale, and the Academic Cheating Behaviours Scale. As expected, triarchic psychopathy added incremental variance in explaining academic cheating, after controlling for Honesty-Humility. Cheating attitudes explained additional 24% after controlling for personality traits. Meanness lead to more lenient attitudes toward cheating, which lead to more academic cheating behaviours. On the other hand, the effects of boldness and disinhibition were not mediated by attitudes towards cheating. Overall, the results suggest that the psychopathic traits display the effects on the academic cheating via several different mechanisms. The findings have both important theoretical and practical implications.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 393
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting Academic Cheating with Triarchic Psychopathy and Cheating Attitudes
    Tajana Ljubin-Golub
    Ema Petričević
    Katarina Sokić
    [J]. Journal of Academic Ethics, 2020, 18 : 377 - 393
  • [2] CHEATING IN THE ACADEMIC SETTINGS -THE ROLE OF DARK TETRAD, ATTITUDES TOWARD CHEATING AND MORAL REASONING
    Jambresic, Ivana
    Humer, Jasmina Tomasic
    Cikes, Ana Babic
    [J]. PRIMENJENA PSIHOLOGIJA, 2020, 13 (02): : 243 - 262
  • [3] ATTITUDES TOWARDS ACADEMIC CHEATING DURING NURSING STUDIES
    Balik, C.
    Sharon, D.
    Kelishek, S.
    Tabak, N.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND LAW, 2010, 29 (04): : 547 - 563
  • [4] SACCIA Communication, Attitudes Towards Cheating and Academic Misconduct
    Stojanov, Ana
    Hannawa, Annegret
    Adam, Lee
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC ETHICS, 2024,
  • [5] Impulsivity and Academic Cheating
    Anderman, Eric M.
    Cupp, Pamela K.
    Lane, Derek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2010, 78 (01): : 135 - 150
  • [7] NEW AGE ACADEMIC CHEATING
    Parokha, A.
    [J]. INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 5128 - 5128
  • [8] Achievement goals and academic cheating
    Anderman, Eric M.
    Danner, Fred
    [J]. REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PSYCHOLOGIE SOCIALE-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 21 (1-2): : 155 - 180
  • [9] Attitudes toward, and intentions to report, academic cheating among students in Singapore
    Lim, VKG
    See, SKB
    [J]. ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2001, 11 (03) : 261 - 274
  • [10] ANALYSIS OF CHEATING ON ACADEMIC ASSIGNMENTS
    GARDNER, WM
    ROPER, JT
    GONZALEZ, CC
    SIMPSON, RG
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1988, 38 (04): : 543 - 555