Aprepitant for antiemesis after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery A randomised controlled trial

被引:20
|
作者
Ham, Sung Yeon [1 ]
Shim, Yon Hee [2 ]
Kim, Eun Ho [1 ]
Son, Min Ji [3 ]
Park, Won Sun [4 ]
Lee, Jeong Soo [2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Anaesthesiol & Pain Med, 211 Eonju Ro, Seoul 135720, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Gangnam Severance Hosp, Coll Med, Anaesthesia & Pain Res Inst,Dept Anaesthesiol & P, 211 Eonju Ro, Seoul 135720, South Korea
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Biol, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Yonsei Univ, Yongin Severance Hosp, Coll Med, Anaesthesia & Pain Res Inst,Dept Anaesthesiol & P, 211 Eonju Ro, Seoul 135720, South Korea
关键词
SIMPLIFIED RISK SCORE; POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA; PREVENTION; ONDANSETRON; ANTAGONIST; CASOPITANT; EMESIS; SINGLE; PAY;
D O I
10.1097/EJA.0000000000000242
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUNDOndansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and aprepitant, a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, block the emetic effect of serotonin and neurokinin, respectively. Aprepitant combined with ondansetron can be more effective for preventing emesis in patients at high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).OBJECTIVETo investigate the prophylactic effect of combining aprepitant with ondansetron compared with ondansetron alone on PONV in patients with fentanyl-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.DESIGNSingle-centre, double-blinded randomised controlled trial.SETTINGA major university hospital in Seoul, Korea, between July 2012 and April 2013.PATIENTSOne hundred and twenty-five female patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 or 2) with fentanyl-based intravenous PCA after gynaecological laparoscopy were recruited to the study, and 110 completed the protocol.INTERVENTIONSOral aprepitant 80mg or placebo was given 1h before anaesthesia. In all patients, ondansetron 4mg was administered intravenously at the end of surgery and 12mg was added to the PCA solution.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome measure was complete response (no PONV and no rescue antiemetics) up to 48h postoperatively.RESULTSThere was no difference in the proportion of complete responses to 48h between the groups (P=0.05), but in the post-anaesthesia care unit and up to 24h postoperatively, the proportion was significantly higher in the aprepitant and ondansetron group than in the ondansetron only group (76 vs. 50%, P=0.004 and 38 vs. 16%, P=0.011, respectively). In the aprepitant and ondansetron group, the time to first PONV was delayed (P=0.014) and the incidence of nausea up to 24h postoperatively was lower (P=0.014). However, there were no differences in the incidences of retching or vomiting, the severity of nausea, use of rescue antiemetics or the incidence of side-effects.CONCLUSIONAprepitant 80mg orally with ondansetron is effective in suppressing early PONV up to 24h postoperatively and delays the time to first PONV in patients with fentanyl-based intravenous PCA after gynaecological laparoscopy. However, the combination prophylaxis with aprepitant and ondansetron failed to reach the predefined primary study outcome when compared with ondansetron alone.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 95
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of liberal oral intake on postoperative outcomes after elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled clinical trial
    Bao, Kaibei
    Deng, Yingqing
    Zhao, Xiaotong
    Zhao, Tingting
    Chen, Jiaxin
    Li, Tian
    Zhu, Qianqian
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2022, 35 (06) : 1079 - 1086
  • [2] EFFECT OF INTRAPERITONEAL BUPIVACAINE ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN IN LAPAROSCOPIC GYNAECOLOGICAL SURGERY- A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Patel, Pradipta Kumar
    Dora, Santosh Kumar
    Pande, Benudhar
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (10): : 1209 - 1211
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided versus conventional lung recruitment manoeuvres in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery A randomised controlled trial
    Park, Sun-Kyung
    Yang, Hyojun
    Yoo, Seokha
    Kim, Won Ho
    Lim, Young-Jin
    Bahk, Jae-Hyon
    Kim, Jin-Tae
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 38 (03) : 275 - 284
  • [4] Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
    Ling Cui
    Yu Shi
    GN Zhang
    Trials, 17
  • [5] Fast-track surgery after gynaecological oncological surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomised controlled trial
    Cui, Ling
    Shi, Yu
    Zhang, G. N.
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [6] Intra-operative dexmedetomidine reduces early postoperative nausea but not vomiting in adult patients after gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled trial
    Geng, Zhi-Yu
    Liu, Ya-Fei
    Wang, Shan-Shan
    Wang, Dong-Xin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (10) : 761 - 766
  • [7] Nalbuphine on postoperative gastrointestinal tract dysfunction after laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological malignancies: A randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Jia-wei
    Tian, Lin
    Zhang, Le
    Hu, Jian-ying
    Huang, Shao-qiang
    Jiao, Jing
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 48 (02) : 170 - 176
  • [8] Laparoscopic and robotic training in abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial
    Gall, Tamara
    Alrawashdeh, Wasfi
    Soomro, Naeem
    White, Steve
    Jiao, Long
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 16 - 16
  • [9] Yoga for Gynaecological Cancer Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Archer, S.
    Sowter, H.
    Montague, J.
    Bali, A.
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 : 27 - 28
  • [10] Effect of virtual reality training on laparoscopic surgery: randomised controlled trial
    Larsen, Christian R.
    Soerensen, Jette L.
    Grantcharov, Teodor P.
    Dalsgaard, Torur
    Schouenborg, Lars
    Ottosen, Christian
    Schroeder, Torben V.
    Ottesen, Bent S.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 : 1253