Software updates of OCT segmentation algorithms influence longitudinal assessment of retinal atrophy

被引:4
|
作者
Coric, Danko [1 ,2 ]
Petzold, Axel [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Uitdehaag, Bernard M. J. [1 ]
Balk, Lisanne J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, POB 7057, NL-1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dutch Expertise Ctr Neuroophthalmol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Moorfields Eye Hosp, City Rd, London, England
[4] Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, Queen Sq, London, England
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Optical coherence tomography; Retinal nerve fiber layer; Neuro-ophthalmology; Retinal layer segmentation; Bland-Altman analysis; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; NERVE-FIBER LAYER; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; AXONAL DEGENERATION; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; VISUAL PATHWAY; THICKNESS; MS; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jns.2018.01.020
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To investigate whether there is a systematic difference in peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness measurements between subsequent updates of pRNFL segmentation software provided by Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: In total, 838 pRNFL scans from 213 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 61 healthy controls were analyzed. All scans were performed on the same OCT device followed by automated segmentation (HRA 5.6.4.0) and data extraction. Subsequently, all scans were re-segmented with an updated software version (HRA 6.0.7.0). To assess level of agreement between the two algorithms, Bland-Altman Plots were constructed. Paired samples t-test and linear regression analyses were used to investigate for differences in mean thickness and proportional bias respectively. Results: Overall, the updated version showed an overestimation of 0.16 mu m [95%CI 0.097-0.23, p < 0.001] for the global pRNFL thickness compared to the earlier version. The largest differences were found for the nasal inferior (mean A 0.29 mu m, p < 0.001) and temporal inferior (mean A 0.43 mu m, p < 0.001) sectors. Inspection of the Bland-Altman Plot revealed that the difference between the two versions could be up to 6 mu m for the global mean. There was no proportional bias for the global mean (beta = 0.003, p = 0.245) nor for any of the separate sectors. Conclusion: The data show a significant difference in pRNFL thickness measurements between two subsequent versions of the same segmentation software. Although the mean difference was relatively small, the differences within the individual subject could be considerably higher than the known atrophy rate of 1 mu m/year in MS.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 20
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Updates in OCT segmentation software influence longitudinal assessment of retinal atrophy
    Coric, D.
    Petzold, A.
    Uitdehaag, B. M. J.
    Balk, L. J.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 : 563 - 564
  • [2] Standardization of OCT Derived Central Retinal Thickness With Custom Segmentation Software
    Sovinski, Gregory James
    Domalpally, Amitha
    Myers, Dawn
    Huang, Yijun
    Blodi, Barbara A.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [3] Longitudinal assessment of retinal integrity in multiple sclerosis using 3D OCT imaging and intra-retinal layer segmentation
    Droby, A.
    Zaubizer, L.
    Paradis, M.
    Klotz, L.
    Meuth, S.
    Wiendl, H.
    Zipp, F.
    Fleischer, V.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 : 466 - 466
  • [4] Automatic Retinal Surface Segmentation in 3D OCT scans with Geographic Atrophy
    Bai, Junjie
    Hu, Zhihong
    Shi, Yue
    Sadda, Srinivas R.
    Wu, Xiaodong
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [5] Comparison of Automated Retinal Segmentation across OCT Devices using Independent Analysis Software
    Oakley, Jonathan D.
    Andorra, Magi
    Martinez-Lapiscina, Elena H.
    Russakoff, Daniel
    Villoslada, Pablo
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2016, 57 (12)
  • [6] Longitudinal analysis of Retinal Pigment Epithelium Atrophy progression using automated segmentation algorithm
    Mosinska, Agata
    Stadelmann, Marc
    Montesel, Andrea
    Gigon, Anthony
    Apostolopoulos, Stefanos
    Ciller, Carlos
    Mantel, Irmela
    De Zanet, Sandro
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (08)
  • [7] Retinal OCT Image Segmentation: How Well do Algorithms Generalize or How Transferable are the Data?
    Melinscak, M.
    Loncaric, S.
    [J]. 2020 43RD INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY (MIPRO 2020), 2020, : 192 - 196
  • [8] Deep survival modeling of longitudinal retinal OCT volumes for predicting the onset of atrophy in patients with intermediate AMD
    Rivail, Antoine
    Vogl, Wolf -Dieter
    Riedl, Sophie
    Grechenig, Christoph
    Coulibaly, Leonard M.
    Reiter, Gregor S.
    Guymer, Robyn H.
    Wu, Zhichao
    Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula
    Bogunovic, Hrvoje
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2023, 14 (06) : 2449 - 2464
  • [9] Beyond Retinal Layers: A Deep Voting Model for Automated Geographic Atrophy Segmentation in SD-OCT Images
    Ji, Zexuan
    Chen, Qiang
    Niu, Sijie
    Leng, Theodore
    Rubin, Daniel L.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 7 (01):
  • [10] Deep Learning Segmentation-Free Assessment of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer in OCT Scans
    Mariottoni, Eduardo Bicalho
    Jammal, Alessandro A.
    Urata, Carla
    Thompson, Atalie C.
    Medeiros, Felipe A.
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2019, 60 (09)