The effect of pedal crank arm length on joint angle and power production in upright cycle ergometry

被引:26
|
作者
Too, D
Landwer, GE
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Brockport, Dept Phys Educ & Sport, Brockport, NY 14420 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Hlth & Phys Educ, Las Vegas, NV 89154 USA
关键词
crank arm length; cycling; ergometry; joint angle; power;
D O I
10.1080/026404100365054
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of five pedal crank arm lengths (110, 145, 180, 230 and 265 mm) on hip, knee and ankle angles and on the peak, mean and minimum power production of Il males (26.6 +/- 3.8 years, 179 +/- 8 cm, 79.6 +/- 9.5 kg) during upright cycle ergometry. Computerized 30 s Wingate power tests were performed on a free weight Monark cycle ergometer against a resistance of 8.5% body weight. Joint angles were determined, with an Ariel Performance Analysis System, from videotape recorded at 100 Hz. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and contrast comparisons revealed that, with increasing crank arm lengths, there was a significant decrement in the minimum hip and knee angles, a significant increment in the ranges of motion of the joints, and a parabolic curve to describe power production. The largest peak and mean powers occurred with a crank arm length of 180 mm. We conclude that 35 mm changes in pedal crank arm length significantly alter both hip and knee joint angles and thus affect cycling performance.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 161
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of pedal crankarm length on power production in recumbent cycle ergometry
    Too, D
    I S B S 1995 PROCEEDINGS - XIII INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM FOR BIOMECHANICS IN SPORT, 1996, : 350 - 353
  • [2] The effects of maximal and submaximal arm crank ergometry and cycle ergometry on postural sway
    Hill, Mathew W.
    Goss-Sampson, Mark
    Duncan, Michael J.
    Price, Michael J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2014, 14 (08) : 782 - 790
  • [3] Cardiopulmonary exercise testing: arm crank vs cycle ergometry
    Orr, J. L.
    Williamson, P.
    Anderson, W.
    Ross, R.
    McCafferty, S.
    Fettes, P.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 68 (05) : 497 - 501
  • [4] THE EFFECT OF PEDAL CADENCE AND POWER OUTPUT ON RPE DURING CYCLE ERGOMETRY
    Boutcher, S. H.
    Hamer, M.
    Nurhayati, Y.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (05): : S279 - S279
  • [5] Effect of shoulder angle on physiological responses during incremental peak arm crank ergometry
    Leicht, Anthony S.
    Spinks, Warwick L.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2007, 25 (04) : 443 - 452
  • [6] EFFECTS OF CRANK LENGTH AND SEAT POSITION ON ARM CRANKED ERGOMETRY PERFORMANCE
    HIGHT, TK
    ZOMLEFER, MR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, PTS 1-4, 1988, : 1610 - 1611
  • [7] Effects of Bicycle Crank Length on Gross Efficiency, Power, and Joint Kinematics During Cycling Ergometry
    O'Hara, Christiane R.
    Clark, Robert D.
    Bodwin, Kelly
    Swick, Cameron
    Grohmann, Natalie
    Bohn, Austin
    Shen, Ashley
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2019, 51 (06): : 52 - 52
  • [8] The effect of crank rate strategy on peak aerobic power and peak physiological responses during arm crank ergometry
    Smith, Paul M.
    Doherty, Mike
    Price, Michael J.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2007, 25 (06) : 711 - 718
  • [9] The influence of crank configuration torque production during arm on muscle activity and crank ergometry
    Smith, Paul M.
    Chapman, Mark L.
    Hazlehurst, Kathryn E.
    Goss-Sampson, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) : 598 - 605
  • [10] Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry
    Tropp, H
    Samuelsson, K
    Jorfeldt, L
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1997, 31 (01) : 41 - 44