Melphalan 200 mg/m2 does not increase toxicity and improves survival in comparison to reduced doses of melphalan in multiple myeloma patients

被引:4
|
作者
Brioli, Annamaria [1 ,2 ]
vom Hofe, Felix [1 ]
Rucci, Paola [3 ]
Ernst, Thomas [1 ]
Yomade, Olaposi [1 ]
Hilgendorf, Inken [1 ]
Scholl, Sebastian [1 ]
Sayer, Herbert [4 ]
Muegge, Lars-Olof [5 ]
Hochhaus, Andreas [1 ]
von Lilienfeld-Toal, Marie [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Jena, Abt Hamatol & Internist Onkol, Klin Innere Med 2, Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Jena, Else Kroner Forsch Kolleg AntiAge, Res Programm, Jena, Germany
[3] Alma Mater Studiorum Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] HELIOS Klin, Med Klin Hamatol & Internist Onkol 4, Hamostaseol, Erfurt, Germany
[5] Heinrich Braun Klinikum, Klin Innere Med Hamatol Onkol & Palliat Med 3, Zwickau, Germany
[6] Hans Knoell Inst, Leibniz Inst Infekt Biol & Naturstoff Forsch, Jena, Germany
关键词
STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION; LENALIDOMIDE; DEXAMETHASONE; MAINTENANCE; BORTEZOMIB; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1038/s41409-020-01170-0
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) conditioned with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (Mel200) is standard of care for young multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Lower doses of melphalan (MelRed) have been used to reduce toxicity, although data regarding their efficacy are not concordant. We retrospectively evaluated 313 MM patients receiving ASCT at Jena University Hospital between 2003 and 2017. Patients receiving MelRed were on average older (p < 0.001), had a worse renal function (p < 0.001) and more comorbidities (p < 0.001). No differences were seen in treatment response before ASCT between the two groups, whilst after ASCT the rate of at least very good partial responses (VGPR) was significantly higher for patients receiving Mel200 (93% vs. 76%, p < 0.001). PFS (39 vs. 20 months, p < 0.001) and OS (103 vs. 59 months, p = 0.001) were longer with Mel200. Toxicities were comparable in the two groups. After adjusting for age and clinical characteristics using the propensity score, for VGPR before and after ASCT and for double ASCT strategy in a Cox regression analysis, Mel200 was still associated with a lower risk of disease progression (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.40-0.96) and of death (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.35-1.07). Our results confirm that Mel200 is still the standard of care for ASCT eligible myeloma patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1212
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Melphalan 200 mg/m2 does not increase toxicity and improves survival in comparison to reduced doses of melphalan in multiple myeloma patients
    Annamaria Brioli
    Felix vom Hofe
    Paola Rucci
    Thomas Ernst
    Olaposi Yomade
    Inken Hilgendorf
    Sebastian Scholl
    Herbert Sayer
    Lars-Olof Mügge
    Andreas Hochhaus
    Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2021, 56 : 1209 - 1212
  • [2] 200 mg/m2 melphalan—the gold standard for multiple myeloma
    Sergio Giralt
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2010, 7 : 490 - 491
  • [3] COMPARISON OF BUSULFAN plus MELPHALAN TO MELPHALAN 200 MG/M2 AS PREPARATIVE REGIMEN FOR AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA
    Ahmed, S.
    Dinh, Y.
    Rondon, G.
    Andersson, B.
    Jones, R.
    Bashir, Q.
    Shah, N.
    Popat, U.
    Champlin, R. E.
    Qazilbash, M. H.
    Kebriaei, P.
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (02) : S251 - S251
  • [4] Double Transplantation with Melphalan (200 mg/m2) Compared with Triple Transplantation with Intermediate Dose Melphalan (100 mg/m2) in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Spicka, Ivan
    Linkesch, Werner
    Greil, Richard
    Kasparu, Hedwig
    Gunsilius, Eberhard
    Thaler, Josef
    Drach, Johannes
    Kuhn, Ingrid
    Weissmann, Adalbert
    Hinke, Axel
    BLOOD, 2008, 112 (11) : 1139 - 1139
  • [5] 200 mg/m2 melphalan-the gold standard for multiple myeloma
    Giralt, Sergio
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 7 (09) : 490 - 491
  • [6] In myeloma patients treated with melphalan 100mg/m2 or melphalan 200mg/m2 outcome is not significantly different.
    Palumbo, A
    Triolo, S
    Bringhen, S
    Rus, C
    Omedè, P
    Bertola, A
    Giaccone, L
    Bianchi, A
    Bruno, B
    Tarella, C
    Caravita, T
    Musto, P
    Amadori, S
    Carotenuto, M
    Pileri, A
    Boccadoro, M
    BLOOD, 2000, 96 (11) : 419A - 419A
  • [7] Melphalan 200 mg/m2 versus 100 mg/m2 in newly diagnosed myeloma
    Palumbo, A.
    Bringhen, S.
    Petrucci, M. T.
    Falcone, A.
    Liberati, A. M.
    Lauta, V. M.
    Montanaro, M.
    Cangialosi, C.
    Morandi, S.
    D'Agostino, F.
    Cavallo, F.
    Omede, P.
    Musto, P.
    Foue, R.
    Boccadoro, M.
    HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 92 (06): : 189 - 189
  • [8] Melphalan 200 mg/m2 versus melphalan 100 mg/m2 in newly diagnosed myeloma patients: a prospective, multicenter phase 3 study
    Palumbo, Antonio
    Bringhen, Sara
    Bruno, Benedetto
    Falcone, Antonietta Pia
    Liberati, Anna Marina
    Grasso, Mariella
    Ria, Roberto
    Pisani, Francesco
    Cangialosi, Clotilde
    Caravita, Tommaso
    Levi, Anna
    Meloni, Giovanna
    Nozza, Andrea
    Pregno, Patrizia
    Gabbas, Attilio
    Callea, Vincenzo
    Rizzo, Manuela
    Annino, Luciana
    De Stefano, Valerio
    Musto, Pellegrino
    Baldi, Ileana
    Cavallo, Federica
    Petrucci, Maria Teresa
    Massaia, Massimo
    Boccadoro, Mario
    BLOOD, 2010, 115 (10) : 1873 - 1879
  • [9] Prospective, randomized comparison between double mransplantation (T) with melphalan (200 mg/m2) and triple T with intermediate dose melphalan (100 mg/m2) in patients with multiple myeloma (an interim analysis).
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Linkesch, Werner
    Kasparu, Hedwig
    Krieger, Otto
    Spicka, Ivan
    Gastl, Gunther
    Greil, Richard
    Drach, Johannes
    Thaler, Josef
    Kuhn, Ingrid
    Zojer, Niklas
    Hinke, Axel
    BLOOD, 2006, 108 (11) : 878A - 879A
  • [10] Dose-intensive melphalan regimens (100 mg/m2 versus 200 mg/m2) in multiple myeloma patients.
    Boccadoro, M
    Bringhen, S
    Cavallo, F
    Falco, P
    Bertola, A
    Barbui, A
    Caravita, T
    Musto, P
    Pescosta, N
    Vignetti, M
    Palumbo, A
    BLOOD, 2002, 100 (11) : 431A - 431A