Comparison of personality types and learning styles of engineering students, agricultural systems management students, and faculty in an agricultural and biological engineering department

被引:0
|
作者
Zimmerman, A. P.
Johnson, R. G.
Hoover, T. S.
Hilton, J. W.
Heinemann, P. H.
Buckmaster, D. R.
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr & Extens Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Ohio State Univ, Agr Tech Inst, Wooster, OH USA
关键词
GEFT; learning styles; MBTI; personality type;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study investigated differences in learning styles and personality types among engineering students, agricultural systems management students, and faculty in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. Learning styles and personality types were evaluated using the Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), respectively. Mean values for the GEFT for all three groups indicated a strong preference for the field-independent learning style. There were no significant differences in MBTI type preferences between engineering students and faculty. However, the agricultural systems management students differed significantly (p < 0.05) from faculty in their preference for Perceiving and from engineering students in their preference for Sensing. Results of the study are useful in helping faculty better understand and improve the teaching and learning process involving the two groups of students.
引用
收藏
页码:311 / 317
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of personality types and learning styles of engineering students, agricultural systems management students, and faculty in an Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department
    Agricultural Technical Institute, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States
    不详
    不详
    不详
    不详
    [J]. Trans. ASABE, 2006, 1 (311-317):
  • [2] Cognitive and learning styles of the faculty of engineering and technology students: University of Botswana
    [J]. Sealetsa, O.J., 2012, World Institute for Engineering and Technology Education, 34 Hampshire Road, Glen Waverley, Melbourne, VIC 3150, Australia (10):
  • [3] PERSONALITY-TYPES IN ENGINEERING STUDENTS
    SODERHOLM, L
    [J]. DESIGN NEWS, 1976, 31 (18) : 7 - 7
  • [4] Learning Styles and Achievement of Engineering Students
    Tulsi, P. K.
    Poonia, M. P.
    Anupriya
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON2016), 2016, : 192 - 196
  • [5] LEARNING STYLES OF CIVIL ENGINEERING STUDENTS
    Solis Carcano, Romel G.
    Arcudia Abad, Carlos E.
    [J]. REVISTA EDUCACION EN INGENIERIA, 2010, 5 (10): : 24 - 36
  • [6] LONGITUDINAL SURVEY OF FEMALE FACULTY IN BIOLOGICAL AND AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
    Abadie, A.
    Christy, A.
    Jones, J.
    Wang, J.
    Lima, M.
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2009, 52 (04) : 1397 - 1405
  • [7] Learning Styles of Engineering Technology and Engineering Students: Pedagogical Implications
    Broberg, Hal
    Lin, Paul
    Griggs, Karen
    Steffen, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 25 (01) : 10 - 17
  • [8] STUDY OF ABILITIES ACQUIRED BY AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING STUDENTS
    Martinez, F.
    Palencia, P.
    Weiland, C.
    [J]. INTED2011: 5TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2011, : 5142 - 5150
  • [9] The Learning Styles of Taiwanese Mechanical Engineering Students
    Hsiung, Chin Min
    Lin, Chichang
    [J]. MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1-3, 2012, 418-420 : 2143 - 2146
  • [10] The role of personality traits on learning styles of engineering and management students studying the internet of things knowledge areas
    Singar, Arjun V.
    Jain, Shashi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2024, 17 (05)