Modern chemometric data analysis - methods for the objective evaluation of load in river systems

被引:4
|
作者
Kowalik, Corinna [1 ]
Einax, Juergen W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Inst Organ & Analyt Chem, Dept Environm Anal, D-07743 Jena, Germany
来源
ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA | 2006年 / 34卷 / 05期
关键词
chemometric method; cluster analysis; cluster imaging; factor analysis; information theory; multiway-PLS regression; pollution; projection pursuit;
D O I
10.1002/aheh.200500649
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental data are highly variable. They also include uncertainties resulting from all steps of the analytical process e.g. sampling, or sampling pre-treatment. However, a lot of information is unfortunately often lost because only univariate statistical methods are used for data evaluation and interpretation. This neglects correlation between different pollutants and relationships among various sampling points. It is therefore necessary to apply additional methods of analysis that can accommodate such relationships. This ability is provided by the established, and by the more modern, multivariate statistical methods because they can analyze complex sets of multidimensional data. These methods are used to visualize large amounts of data and to extract latent information (e.g. differently polluted areas, dischargers, or interactions between different environmental compartments). The goal of this paper is to present the use of established statistical techniques, like cluster or factor analysis, and the progress made in basic modern techniques (e.g. cluster imaging, multiway-partial least squares regression, projection pursuit, or information theory) and to demonstrate each with examples and illustrations.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 436
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] River pollution data interpreted by means of chemometric methods
    Einax, JW
    Truckenbrodt, D
    Kampe, O
    MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 58 (03) : 315 - 324
  • [2] Evaluation and quality control of environmental analytical data from the Niagara River using multiple chemometric methods
    Cancilla, DA
    Fang, XC
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 1996, 22 (02) : 241 - 253
  • [3] Evaluation of the use of chemometric methods in soil analysis
    de Sena, MM
    Poppi, RJ
    Frighetto, RTS
    Valarini, PJ
    QUIMICA NOVA, 2000, 23 (04): : 547 - 556
  • [4] Objective methods for radar systems evaluation
    Ibrahim, F
    Hanafy, AE
    THIRTEENTH NATIONAL RADIO SCIENCE CONFERENCE - NRSC'96, 1996, : 497 - 505
  • [5] Gene expression (microarray) data analysis by chemometric methods
    Zhu, David X.
    Goeke, Richard J.
    Baker, David L.
    Hamburg, James H.
    Booth, David E.
    Booth, Stephane E.
    CURRENT ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 3 (03) : 233 - 237
  • [6] Analysis of neurobehavioural data by chemometric methods in ecotoxicological studies
    Gomez-Canela, Cristian
    Prats, Eva
    Tauler, Roma
    Ralcidua, Demetrio
    ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2017, 145 : 583 - 590
  • [7] INTERPRETATION AND ANALYSIS OF COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTAL DATA USING CHEMOMETRIC METHODS
    WENNING, RJ
    ERICKSON, GA
    TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 13 (10) : 446 - 457
  • [8] CHEMOMETRIC INVESTIGATIONS ON THE DIFFERENTIATED EVALUATION OF ELEMENT TRACE ANALYSIS IN RIVER WATERS
    EINAX, J
    GEISS, S
    FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1994, 350 (1-2): : 14 - 17
  • [9] METHODS FOR EVALUATION OF LOAD-CARRIAGE SYSTEMS
    WINSMANN, FR
    GOLDMAN, RF
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1976, 43 (03) : 1211 - 1218
  • [10] Chemometric analysis of hydro-chemical data of an alluvial river - A case study
    Singh, KP
    Malik, A
    Singh, VK
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2006, 170 (1-4): : 383 - 404